Skip to content

Short-Term Effects of Dynamic Taping in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation

Short-Term Effects of Dynamic Taping on Pain, Pain Threshold, Endurance, Balance, Lumbar Joint Mobility And Functionality in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05940519
Enrollment
34
Registered
2023-07-11
Start date
2023-07-12
Completion date
2023-08-15
Last updated
2023-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain, Lumbar Disc Herniation

Keywords

lumbar disc herniation, dynamic tape, acute pain

Brief summary

Previous evidence has shown that kinesio tape application reduces pain levels and improves disability in patients with chronic low back pain due to lumbar disc herniation. However, it is not known, whether the dynamic taping can decrease back pain, improve endurance of paraspinal muscles, and improve functional capacity in patients with lumbar disk herniation. The aim of the current study is to examine the acute effects of dynamic taping on pain, pain threshold, endurance, balance, lumbar joint mobility and functionality in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Detailed description

The study will include 34 volunteer adult patients who have been diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation according to the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging and have referred to the physiotherapy and rehabilitation service by a specialist physician. The patients will be divided into 2 groups as dynamic tape (n=17) and sham tape (n=17). Patients' pain will be evaluated with Numerical Rating Scale, pain threshold Jtech Commander digital algometer, lumbar muscle endurance Modified Sorenson Test, balance functional reach test, lumbar joint mobility universal goniometer and functional movement levels of patients with timed get up and go test. Evaluations will be carried out in 3 stages: before taping, 2 hours after taping and 3 days after taping. The measurements of the dynamic and sham taping applications of the 2 hours after and 3 days will be compared with the pre-taping and post taping results between two groups. The outcomes of the study will be analyzed by appropriate statistical methods.

Interventions

OTHERDynamic taping technique

The dynamic taping method as specified in the literature will be applied to the right and left lumbar paravertebral muscles in the dynamic taping group. Patients' pain will be evaluated with Numerical Rating Scale, pain threshold Jtech Commander digital algometer, lumbar muscle endurance Modified Sorenson Test, balance functional reach test, lumbar joint mobility universal goniometer and functional movement levels of patients with timed get up and go test. Evaluations will be carried out in 3 stages: before taping, 2 hours after taping and 3 days after taping. The measurements of the dynamic and sham taping applications of the 2 hours after and 3 days will be compared with the pre-taping and post taping results between two groups.

OTHERSham taping

Sham taping will be applied with a surgical patch while the patient is in a comfortable position without any technique or stretching.Evaluations will be carried out in 3 stages: before taping, 2 hours after taping and 3 days after taping. Patients' pain will be evaluated with Numerical Rating Scale, pain threshold Jtech Commander digital algometer, lumbar muscle endurance Modified Sorenson Test, balance functional reach test, lumbar joint mobility universal goniometer and functional movement levels of patients with timed get up and go test. Evaluations will be carried out in 3 stages: before taping, 2 hours after taping and 3 days after taping. The measurements of the dynamic and sham taping applications of the 2 hours after and 3 days will be compared with the pre-taping and post taping results between two groups.

Sponsors

NAİME ULUG
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participant will not informed about the intervention

Intervention model description

prospective randomized controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with diagnose of lumbar disc herniation, * self-reported activity pain due to lumbar disc herniation for at least the last 3 months, * with pain severity equal to or greater than 3 on a numerical rating scale, * patients with no skin irritation, sensitivities or allergies

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with spinal pathology, lumbar surgery, motor weakness, urinary or fecal incontinence due to lumbar disc herniation, cauda equina syndrome, pregnancy, neurological or rheumatological condition, dermatitis or pre-existing skin lesion over the taping area, and having dynamic taping allergies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain severity evaluationUp to one monthThe severity of the pain will be measured with Numerical Rating Scale. The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain imaginable.
Pain threshold measurementUp to one monthPain threshold will be measured Jtech Commander digital algometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The evaluation of lumbar muscle enduranceUp to one monthModified Sorenson Test will be used
The evaluation of balanceUp to one monthFunctional reach test will be used
Lumbar joint mobilityUp to one monthUniversal goniometer will be used
Functional movement levelUp to one monthTimed up and go test will be used

Contacts

Primary ContactM.Fatih Adalı, Msc.
fzt.fadali@gmail.com+905543298251

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026