Skip to content

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy in Comparison With Invasive Intracoronary FFR Measurement, in the Assessment of Significant Residual Coronary Stenosis After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Dyna-MI Pilot Study.

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy in Comparison With Invasive Intracoronary FFR Measurement, in the Assessment of Significant Residual Coronary Stenosis After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Dyna-MI Pilot Study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05940285
Acronym
Dyna-MI
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-07-11
Start date
2023-10-20
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

Dynamic 99mTc-Tetrofosmin CZT-SPECT, Myocardial perfusion imaging, fractional flow reserve, acute coronary syndrome

Brief summary

Dynamic 99mTc-Tetrofosmin CZT-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an advanced functional imaging technique giving important myocardial flow quantification added data in comparison with conventional MPI, especially in coronary multi vessel disease. A large-scale validation of diagnostic performances of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) estimated with Dynamic 99mTc-Tetrofosmin CZT-SPECT MPI would allow a non-invasive approach instead of invasive intra-coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. The aim of this prospective study is to assess diagnostic performances of MFR calculated with dynamic 99mTc-Tetrofosmin CZT-SPECT MPI in comparison with invasive intra-coronary FFR measurement in patients with significant residual coronary arteries stenosis after acute coronary syndrome .

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDynamic 99mTc-Tetrofosmin CZT-SPECT

Patients included in the study will undergo subsequently at 1-month after acute coronary syndrome Dynamic 99mTc-Tetrofosmin CZT-SPECT followed by FFR and IMR assessment

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient. * Multi vessel coronary arteries disease (at least one non-culprit coronary stenosis \>= 50%) diagnosis during * primary percutaneous coronary intervention \< 12h after ST-elevation myocardial infarction opercutaneous revascularisation of the culprit lesion within 24 to 48 hours of an acute non-ST-segment elevation coronary syndrome. * Written consent. * Social security affiliation

Exclusion criteria

* Non adult patient. * Adult patient under tutelage. * Reproductive age women. * Medical history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass surgery. * Cardiogenic shock. * Cardiomyopathy. * Regadenoson/adenosine/FFR contraindication. * 99mTc-Tetrofosmin hypersensibility. * Small non-culprit coronary arteries. * Participation to another interventional study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, negative predictive value, accuracy of MFR in comparison with FFRwithin one month after ST-elevation myocardial infarctionTo determine MFR diagnostic performances in comparison with FFR

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
best MFR cut-off valuewithin one month after ST-elevation myocardial infarctionTo determine the best MFR cut-off value correlated with FFR value \< 0.8
MFR value correlated with IMRwithin one month after ST-elevation myocardial infarctionanalysis of discrepancies between MFR value correlated with IMR (if low MFR value and normal FFR value)
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, negative predictive value, accuracy of MFR in comparison with conventional static MPIwithin one month after ST-elevation myocardial infarctionTo determine MFR diagnostic performances in comparison with conventional static MPI
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, negative predictive value, accuracy of QFR in comparison with FFR valuewithin one month after ST-elevation myocardial infarctionQFR value at the index procedure in comparison with FFR value

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 9, 2026