Exercise, Fall, Parkinson Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
Parkinson's disease (PD) affects approximately 1 million people in the United States and causes significant fall risks. This study aims to develop a community-based exercise program that reduces falls in persons with PD. By combining individualized balance activities with group boxing training, the study seeks to identify modifiable risk factors, improve balance dysfunction, and reduce falls. The findings will inform clinical practice, offering a community-based exercise model to address the urgent need for effective fall prevention interventions in PD.
Detailed description
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and effects approximately 1 million people in the United States. Falls are a significant problem for persons with PD, with incidence rates ranging from 37-80% each year. The long-term goal of this research is to develop exercise training programs to reduce falls in persons with PD. Physical activity and exercise are commonly understood to provide significant benefits in functional mobility for persons with PD. Unfortunately, the translation of improved mobility to an actual reduction in falls has been recalcitrant to traditional exercise therapies. The following proposal is aimed at identifying the modifiable risk factors for falls in persons with PD and characterizing the effect of a novel exercise intervention on fall risk. The investigators will conduct a 12 week community-based exercise program in 20 individuals in which two validated forms of exercise training will be combined into one program. Specifically, individualized balance activities tailored to different domains of balance dysfunction for each individual will be combined with non-contact group boxing training to maximize the therapeutic benefit. The research aims of this investigation are 1) identify the individual characteristics of responders to exercise such as modifiable factors like lower-extremity kinematic joint range of motion and balance domain dysfunction at baseline, and 2) determine if a novel community-based exercise regimen that combines accepted balance and strength training protocols can synergistically improve balance dysfunction and reduce falls. The benefits of exercise in general on PD are undisputed, but there remains an urgent, unmet need for the identification of exercise interventions that can reduce falls. The proposed research is significant because it is expected to provide evidence that a novel community-based exercise program is capable of improving functional mobility in such a way that it can reduce fall incidence for persons with PD. The research aims in this proposal are expected to directly inform clinical practice for rehabilitation providers by identifying the modifiable risk factors that lead to falls in PD and delivering a community-based exercise model that can reduce the harmful effects of falls in this population.
Interventions
Community-based exercise involving non-contact boxing and individualized balance training
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* A diagnosis of idiopathic PD; Male or female 30 years or older at time of PD diagnosis; Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stages 1.0-3.0; Ability to provide informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local regulations.
Exclusion criteria
* Idiopathic PD H&Y stage 4-5, in order to constrain motor dysfunctions to mild-to-moderate PD; Confirmed or suspected atypical parkinsonian syndromes due to drugs, metabolic disorders, encephalitis, or degenerative diseases; Presence of definite dementia by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA \<21); Central or peripheral nervous system disorders (other than PD); Myopathic disease (e.g. focal myopathy) that affects skeletal muscle structure/function; Severe cardiovascular disease that limits exercise abilities.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Falls Experienced During the Study Period as Reported by Self-report | Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks | Higher scores = worse outcome |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| TUG | Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks | The timed up and go test (TUG) is a simple test of the subjects' ability to understand an instruction and perform the task of standing, walking 10ft, turning around, returning 10ft and sitting down Timed Up and Go, higher scores = worse outcome |
| BBS | Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks | The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Scale = 0 - 56 (higher scores = better function) |
| ABC | Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks | The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale is a self-report measure of balance confidence in performing various activities without losing balance or experiencing a sense of unsteadiness. The ABC Scale has 16 questions that require the patient to rate his/her confidence that he/she will not lose balance or become unsteady while performing various activities. Scale: 0 - 100 (higher scores = better confidence) |
| 5-STS | Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks | The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5-STS) is used to asses functional lower extremity strength, transitional movements, balance, and fall risk in older adults. Scoring is based on the amount of time (to the nearest decimal in seconds) a patient is able to transfer from a seated to a standing position and back to sitting five times. Higher scores = Worse outcome |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Participants may be excluded at this point if they demonstrate the presence of definite dementia, determined by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA \< 21).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Community-based Exercise Exercise: Community-based exercise involving non-contact boxing and individualized balance training | 20 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | the presence of definite dementia, determined by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA < 21) | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Community-based Exercise |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 70.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 |
| BMI | 27.8 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 16 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants |
| Hoehn & Yahr | 2.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 17 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants |
| UPDRS (motor) | 16.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 20 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 20 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 20 |
Outcome results
Number of Falls Experienced During the Study Period as Reported by Self-report
Higher scores = worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Number of Falls Experienced During the Study Period as Reported by Self-report | 16 self-reported falls | Standard Error 1.89 |
| Post Intervention | Number of Falls Experienced During the Study Period as Reported by Self-report | 7 self-reported falls | Standard Error 0.83 |
5-STS
The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5-STS) is used to asses functional lower extremity strength, transitional movements, balance, and fall risk in older adults. Scoring is based on the amount of time (to the nearest decimal in seconds) a patient is able to transfer from a seated to a standing position and back to sitting five times. Higher scores = Worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 5-STS | 15.58 seconds | Standard Deviation 3.39 |
| Post Intervention | 5-STS | 11.53 seconds | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
ABC
The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale is a self-report measure of balance confidence in performing various activities without losing balance or experiencing a sense of unsteadiness. The ABC Scale has 16 questions that require the patient to rate his/her confidence that he/she will not lose balance or become unsteady while performing various activities. Scale: 0 - 100 (higher scores = better confidence)
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | ABC | 78.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.74 |
| Post Intervention | ABC | 86.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.45 |
BBS
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Scale = 0 - 56 (higher scores = better function)
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | BBS | 40.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.51 |
| Post Intervention | BBS | 46.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.73 |
TUG
The timed up and go test (TUG) is a simple test of the subjects' ability to understand an instruction and perform the task of standing, walking 10ft, turning around, returning 10ft and sitting down Timed Up and Go, higher scores = worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Intervention at approximately 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | TUG | 11.02 seconds | Standard Deviation 3.28 |
| Post Intervention | TUG | 8.13 seconds | Standard Deviation 1.74 |