Skip to content

LRAMPS Versus LDP in Selected Early-stage Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer

Laparoscopic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatosplecnectomy in Selected Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05939063
Enrollment
160
Registered
2023-07-11
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2028-08-31
Last updated
2023-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

Left-sided pancreatic cancer, Early-stage tumor, Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy, Laparoscopic distal pancreatosplecnectomy, Surgical complication, Oncologic prognosis

Brief summary

This multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial proposed the criteria for selecting patients with early-stage left-sided pancreatic cancer and aimed to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients within the criteria who underwent laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy.

Detailed description

Although prospective comparative studies are lacking, laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy (LDP) was considered to be feasible, safe, and oncologically equivalent for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the extent of posterior resection and the oncological safety of achieving complete N1 lymph node resection in LDP remain uncertain. Strasberg proposed radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for the treatment of resectable left-sided PDAC and confirmed that this technique can achieve negative margins and satisfactory survival. Given the oncological equivalence of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (LRAMPS) and its advantages in short-term outcomes, several studies have assessed the feasibility of LRAMPS as the standard treatment for resectable left-sided PDAC. However, previous studies on LRAMPS have mostly included tumors staged T2 and above, and there is currently no research on the routine use of LRAMPS for early-stage tumors. We proposed the criteria for selecting patients with early-stage left-sided PDAC: (1) diameter ≤ 4 cm; (2) located ≥ 1 cm from the celiac trunk; (3) didn't invade the fascial layer behind the pancreas. This multicenter open-label randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients within the criteria who underwent LRAMPS versus LDP.

Interventions

PROCEDURELDP

For LDP procedure, the dissection plane is located behind the fusion fascia. The N1 station lymph nodes (i.e., groups 10, 11, and 18) in the body and tail of the pancreas are removed. If the tumor is located near the pancreatic body, the No. 9 lymph node group is additionally removed.

PROCEDURELRAMPS

For LRAMPS procedure, Gerota's fascia and perirenal fat capsule are removed, and the procedure is divided into anterior LRAMPS and posterior LRAMPS depending on whether the left adrenal gland is resected. The N1 station lymph nodes (i.e., groups 10, 11, and 18) in the body and tail of the pancreas are removed. If the tumor is located near the pancreatic body, the No. 9 lymph node group is additionally removed.

Sponsors

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
CollaboratorOTHER
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
CollaboratorOTHER
Fudan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically diagnosed as resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer before surgery. * Imaging tumor diameter ≤ 4 cm. * Located ≥ 1cm from the celiac trunk. * Tumor didn't invade the fascial layer behind the pancreas. * Be able to comply with research protocol. * Voluntary participation and signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Received neoadjuvant therapy. * Presence of liver or other distant metastasis. * Multifocal or recurrent disease. * History of other malignancies. * Simultaneously participating in other clinical trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
R0 retroperitoneal margin rateFrom the date of surgery to 1 month after surgery.R0 retroperitoneal margin rate diagnosed by postoperative pathological examination.
R0 transection margin rateFrom the date of surgery to 1 month after surgery.R0 transection margin rate diagnosed by postoperative pathological examination.
Lymph node positive rateFrom the date of surgery to 1 month after surgery.Lymph node positive rate diagnosed by postoperative pathological examination.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perioperative complication rateWithin 90 days after surgery.Adverse events that occur during or after the surgery, including the incidence of postoperative complications reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, clinical relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), postoperative pancreatic hemorrhage (PPH), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), reoperation rate and mortality rate within 90 days after surgery.
Overall survival (OS)Through study completion, an average of 3 year.The time from the surgery to death from any cause.
Life quality satisfaction evaluated according to EORTC C30 scaleThrough study completion, an average of 3 year.The patient's health-related quality of life after surgical intervention. It includes physical, emotional, and social aspects of a patient's well-being. This study evaluated quality of life using a telephone survey and the EORTC C30 scales.
Recurrence-free survival (RFS)Through study completion, an average of 3 year.The time of surgery to the time of tumor recurrence or death.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXianjun Yu, MD, PhD
yuxianjun@fudanpci.org+86-13801669875
Backup ContactZheng Li, MD
lizheng@fudanpci.org+86-18521097686

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026