Skip to content

Estamos Juntos (We Are Together): Improving HIV Care Delivery by Capacitating Health Care Providers

Estamos Juntos (We Are Together): Improving HIV Care Delivery by Capacitating Health Care Providers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05938621
Enrollment
28448
Registered
2023-07-10
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2025-02-27
Last updated
2025-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hiv

Brief summary

Health care workers' negative behavior towards patients (likely a reflection of low job satisfaction, frustration with delivering HIV care and treatment in extremely resource-limited settings, and burnout) is one of the primary reasons people living with HIV abandon treatment in Mozambique. The purpose of this proposal is to test the impact and implementation of a provider resilience intervention and an anti-stigma intervention, individually and in combination, using a randomized controlled trial design at four health facilities. This potentially high-impact intervention offers the opportunity to test a low-cost, provider-focused approach to improving HIV treatment that, if proven effective at increasing adherence and retention in care, could be tested in a fully powered R01 trial in Mozambique.

Detailed description

Mozambique has made progress towards their 95-95-95 goals, yet only 65% of people newly initiated in HIV treatment remain in care at 12 months. HIV treatment adherence has been undermined by a lack of compassionate health care service delivery. People living with HIV in our study region of Zambezia province report being treated disrespectfully by health care workers as one of the leading causes of treatment abandonment. Common complaints include insulting patients' intellectual capacity, ignoring concerns with side effects or co-occurring infections, and refusing to treat patients seen as unworthy. While health care worker behavior is appalling, it is likely a reflection of high rates of burnout, job dissatisfaction, and frustration with patients they perceive to be uncooperative. The implementation of Estamos Juntos (We are Together) will allow us to test a multiprong intervention designed to address provider-barriers to delivering compassionate care via two synergistic components: (1) Resilience and well-being training for health care providers who have expressed low job satisfaction, frustration with delivering care in an extremely resource-limited setting, and burnout; and (2) Anti-stigma training for health care providers who see those with low socioeconomic status, low levels of education, and those living with HIV as lesser-than themselves. We propose to pilot test the implementation and impact of each psychosocial intervention individually, and in combination, using a randomized controlled trial design at four health facilities. We hypothesize that the facility where health care workers receive both resilience and anti-stigma training will see the greatest change in health care worker outcomes, including decreased stigmatizing attitudes, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalize of their patients, as well as increased resilience and job satisfaction. Patients receiving care and treatment from intervention providers will show increased retention and medication adherence, as well as improvements in health care services satisfaction, medical mistrust, and perceived stigma from health care providers.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALbehavioral therapy and education

Sessions that focus on developing self-awareness and strategies to improve well-being will be the focus of the interventions.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Provider Criteria Inclusion Criteria: * Adult individuals, 18 years of age or older; * working as physicians, nurses, medical technicians, health counselors, community health care workers, or other clinical and non-clinical staff (e.g., receptionists, data entry clerk) who provide health services to adults living with HIV at one of the four study sites; * willing to be followed as a study participant during the 6-month study period, and does not intend to transfer to another health facility (HF) during the study period (per investigator's assessment at time of recruitment), as self-reported. * Be able to read and write in Portuguese, as self-reported.

Exclusion criteria

* Those who are not permanent members of the health facility staff (i.e., floating providers that work at multiple sites in a given week); * Any clinical or mental condition, including the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of study recruitment, that as per the investigator's opinion/assessment, would preclude the provision of informed consent or make study participation unsafe or unethical; * Individuals working in the health facility but from the following cadres: drivers, security personnel, and workers with no patient-facing roles. Patient Criteria Inclusion: * Adult individuals, 18 years of age or older * Active in care (i.e., not in default) * Receiving HIV care and treatment at one of the four study sites.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Burnout6 monthsWe assessed burnout using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) at baseline and again at 6 months. Higher numbers indicate greater levels of burnout. We are reporting the change in burnout scores from baseline to 6 months post-intervention. The scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. We are reporting changes in scores, so some numbers are negative.

Countries

Mozambique

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We recruited 25 health care workers from each of four health facilities. Health care workers consented to participate and interacted with the study team. All eligible patients who they treated during the subsequent 6 months were included in the clinical outcome data.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care
Health care providers in this arm will receive no intervention
4,622
Resilience Intervention
Providers in this arm will receive training to improve their resilience and well-being Behavioral therapy and education: Sessions that focus on developing self-awareness and strategies to improve well-being will be the focus of the interventions.
12,929
Resilience and Stigma Group
Providers in this group will receive training to improve their resilience and well-being as well as receive sessions about the impact of stigmatizing their patients. Behavioral therapy and education: Sessions that focus on developing self-awareness and strategies to improve well-being will be the focus of the interventions.
6,349
Anti-stigma Group
Providers in this group will receive sessions focusing on the impact that stigmatizing patients can have on themselves and their patients. Strategies to minimize negative feelings will be developed. Behavioral therapy and education: Sessions that focus on developing self-awareness and strategies to improve well-being will be the focus of the interventions.
4,548
Total28,448

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1522

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma GroupTotal
Age, Continuous32.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
29.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.86
32.11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.49
30.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.11
30.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.91
Number of Years Working in this Health Facility3.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.95
6.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.05
5.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
4.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.09
4.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.07
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4622 Participants12929 Participants6349 Participants4548 Participants28448 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mozambique
4622 participants12929 participants6349 participants4548 participants28448 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants13 Participants19 Participants15 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1553 Participants3846 Participants1945 Participants1597 Participants8941 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Burnout

We assessed burnout using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) at baseline and again at 6 months. Higher numbers indicate greater levels of burnout. We are reporting the change in burnout scores from baseline to 6 months post-intervention. The scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. We are reporting changes in scores, so some numbers are negative.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of CareBurnout-2.0 units on a scale
Resilience InterventionBurnout-5.9 units on a scale
Resilience and Stigma GroupBurnout-5.3 units on a scale
Anti-stigma GroupBurnout-3.9 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026