Skip to content

Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy(ESWL)

Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block As Analgesic Alternatives During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05937256
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-07-10
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2025-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Lithiasis

Brief summary

This study is designed to compare analgesic effect of both the ultrasound (US)-guided QLB and ESPB blocks during ESWL and their effect on stone fragmentation.

Detailed description

Urinary tract calculi, one of the most common benign urological diseases, is seen in 12% of patients and has a recurrence rate of approximately 50%. Management of renal calculi is known to be affected by many factors, specially tolerance of pain during ESWL and how it is controlled. Pain experienced during ESWL is thought to occur when shock waves from the lithotripter reach superficial structures such as skin and also deeper structures such as the ribs, nerves and the kidney capsule. There are three main factors that contribute to the propagation of pain at these structures: shock wave (SW) pressure, distribution, and focal area size . Conventionally, pain during ESWL is managed by basic analgesics such as NSAIDs, which can also aid in stone clearance. Other methods of analgesia also have been studied and tested. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) was first described by Blanco in 2007, it blocks T7-L1 nerve fibres in most of the cases. Studies have reported its use in the management of postoperative pain after hip surgeries. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is another such block, that is increasingly tried for the management of postoperative pain for breast surgery, thoracic surgery, and also upper abdominal surgeries. ESPB when given at the lumbar region gives blockade from C7-T2 to L2-L3.

Interventions

Patients will be placed in lateral decubitus position with the side of the target stone facing up. After sterilization and draping of the skin, using US probe the block will be applied targeting the fascial plane between the quadratus lumborum and psoas major muscles (anterior aspect of the quadratus lumborum). After 20 min, sensory blockade will be evaluated with pinprick test, if loss of sensation is achieved at the T7-L1 dermatome site, the block is considered successful and patients will be transferred to ESWL Room.

PROCEDUREErector spinae plane block

Patients will be placed in the lateral decubitus position according to the selected site. After sterilization and draping of the skin, using US probe, the block will be applied in the plane deep to the erector spinae muscles and superficial to the transverse process. After 20 min, sensory blockade will be assessed with pinprick test, if loss of sensation is achieved at the T7-L1 dermatome site, the block is considered successful and patients is transferred to ESWL Room.

Sponsors

South Valley University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

controlled, randomized, assessor blinded clinical trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed written consent obtained * Age 18-60 * Both sex * American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status: I, II * Stone pelvis less than 2.5 cm * Indicated for ESWL

Exclusion criteria

* refusal of participation by parents or caregivers. * ASA physical status: \> II * Stone pelvis \>2.5 cm * Chronic pain * On chronic NSAID or opioid * Substance addict * Known local anesthetic drug sensitivity. * Preexisting infection at block site * Coagulopathy or anticoagulation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analgesic Effect: cumulative opioid doseAt 30 minutesComparing analgesic Effect of both QLB and ESPB by calculating the total opioid consumption over the total duration of session (approximately 30 minutes)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone fragmentation: shockwave energyat 30 minutesthe level of energy will increase gradually, with shock waves between 3,500 and 5,000 in the 2-4 kilovolt (kV) energy range. Fluoroscopy will be used to check the stone and confirm fragmentation. Then maximum and mean energy of shock that is used will be calculated at the end of session approximately 30 min
Block failure rateImmediately After 20 minutes of interventionthe block will be considered a failed block if the sensory block level of T7-L1 is not achieved after assessment with pinprick test.
The regional block timeprocedure (At the end of intervention)defined as the time taken from the start of the ultrasound scan to the completion of the local anesthetic injection.
Stone fragmentation: clearance rateone week after ESWL sessionDetermining if stone fragmentation considered satisfactory or not, by Follow up kidney, ureter and bladder x-ray (KUB) and Ultrasound.
Adverse effectsimmediately after 20 minutes of interventionThe incidence of adverse effects local (anesthetic toxic reactions, bleeding, or hematoma at the puncture position; failure of block).
Patient satisfactionAt 30 minutespatient satisfaction will be recorded after the procedure using a five-point scale, where 1 is unsatisfied and 5 completely satisfied. At the end of session approximately 30 minutes
Feasibility of visualisationprocedure (At the end of intervention)The ultrasound images will be evaluated with a 4-point method(10) : 0 points, unable to display; 1 point, the anatomical structure and injection target position are not clear, and the puncture needle is partially developed; 2 points, the anatomical structure, and injection target position are clear, but the puncture needle tip is poorly developed, and local anesthetic diffusion is limited; 3 points, typical anatomical structure, and injection target position, the puncture needle tip can be accurately identified, and local anesthetic diffusion is complete. Images with ≥2 points meant that local anesthetics could be injected.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026