Skip to content

Performance Evaluation of Two Silicone Hydrogel Toric Lens Designs in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers

Performance Evaluation of Two Silicone Hydrogel Toric Lens Designs in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05933772
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-07-06
Start date
2023-08-18
Completion date
2023-12-28
Last updated
2025-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Brief summary

The objective of the study was to compare the clinical performance of two monthly toric silicone hydrogel contact lenses in habitual wearers, when worn for 1-month each.

Detailed description

This study was a prospective, bilateral eye, subjected-masked, randomized, 1-month cross-over, daily-wear design involving two different silicone hydrogel toric lens types. Each lens type will be worn bilaterally for approximately one month.

Interventions

DEVICELens A (comfilcon A toric lens)

One month wear

DEVICELens B (lehfilcon A toric lens)

One month wear

Sponsors

Centre for Ocular Research & Education, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Is between 18 and 39 years of age (inclusive) and has full legal capacity to volunteer; 2. Has read and signed an information consent letter; 3. Self-reports having a full eye examination in the previous two years; 4. Anticipates being able to wear the study lenses for at least 8 hours a day, 6 days a week; 5. Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; 6. Habitually wears of toric soft contact lenses binocularly. 1. No more than 1/3 of the participants should be wearing daily disposable soft toric lenses; 2. the remaining 2/3+ of the participants must be planned frequent replacement soft toric lens wearers as follows: * i. TOTAL30 for Astigmatism: maximum of 3 (∼10%) (no target percentage) * ii. Biofinity toric: maximum of 13 (∼40%) (PLUS a target of minimum 10 (∼30%)) * iii. Air Optix for Astigmatism (inclusive of +Hydraglyde): maximum of 10 (∼30%) (PLUS a target of minimum 7 (∼20%)) * iv. ULTRA for Astigmatism: maximum of 5 (∼15%) (no target percentage) * v. Acuvue Vita for Astigmatism: maximum of 3 (∼10%) (no target percentage) * vi. Acuvue Oasys for Astigmatism: maximum of 10 (∼30%) (no target percentage) * vii. Other brands of frequent replacement: maximum of 7 (∼20%) (no target percentage) 7. Has refractive astigmatism of at least -0.75DC but no more than -2.75DC in each eye that is correctable with a soft toric lens with a cylinder power of no greater than -2.25DC; 8. Is ammetropic and requires a spectacle spherical component of +8.00 to -10.00D inclusively; 9. Can be fit and achieve binocular distance vision of at least 20/32 Snellen with the available lens parameters

Exclusion criteria

1. Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study; 2. Has any known active ocular disease and/or infection that contraindicates contact lens wear; 3. Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 4. Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect contact lens wear or a study outcome variable; 5. Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic sodium fluorescein used in the study; 6. Self-reports as pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment; 7. Has undergone refractive error surgery or intraocular surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens Handling on RemovalAt the end of one month of wearLens Handling on Removal, using a 0-100 scale (0= very difficult, 100=very easy).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distance Visual AcuityAt the end of one month of wearDistance Visual Acuity, using Snellen converted to logMAR.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

There were 50 participants enrolled and 1 was discontinued due to lost to follow-up prior to the first lens dispense.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Analysis Population
All participants who completed study. (Total Study Population n=49)
49
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnalysis Population
Age, Continuous30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 490 / 49
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 494 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 490 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Lens Handling on Removal

Lens Handling on Removal, using a 0-100 scale (0= very difficult, 100=very easy).

Time frame: At the end of one month of wear

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lens ALens Handling on Removal89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Lens BLens Handling on Removal91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Distance Visual Acuity

Distance Visual Acuity, using Snellen converted to logMAR.

Time frame: At the end of one month of wear

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lens ADistance Visual Acuity-0.06 logMARStandard Deviation 0.06
Lens BDistance Visual Acuity-0.06 logMARStandard Deviation 0.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026