Long COVID-19 Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Multimodal, Covid19
Brief summary
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the world has seen the need to identify groups of patients who experience various effects in the medium and long term after recovering from the initial illness. These medium- and long-term effects are collectively known as the post-COVID-19 condition, Long-COVID, or prolonged COVID. Current evidence indicates, with conservative estimates, that between 10% and 20% of the population could be affected. Its nature is varied and ranges from physical conditions such as chronic fatigue, dyspnea and muscle weakness, to neurocognitive (compromised memory, decreased concentration) and psychological (anxiety, depression, anguish, stress). Early recognition and treatment of this symptom burden is essential for physical recovery and mental health. Due to its multivariate nature, it has been suggested that optimal recovery of patients' quality of life would only be achieved to the extent that their main symptoms are addressed from an interdisciplinary perspective.
Interventions
The intervention will consist of physical, psychological, cognitive and nutritional training and treatment to be carried out at the Teaching and Research Assistance Center of the University of Magellanus (CADI UMAG), program includes 12 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy sessions, 12 kinesic rehabilitation sessions, 12 treatment sessions per nutrition professional, 12 rehabilitation sessions with occupational therapy professional and 12 rehabilitation sessions with a speech therapist.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Intervention model based on a clinical trial, in which the effectiveness of multimodal treatment will be evaluated in a research group through an ex ante, ex post measurement and then another follow-up measurement compared to a control group. In the first stage, focused on diagnosis, physical, neurological and mental health evaluations will be carried out, to then begin an interdisciplinary treatment process for 6 months, the second stage will be a retest evaluation using the same parameters used at the beginning, applied at the end of the intervention, and finally in the third stage, to evaluate the results with respect to a follow-up carried out 3 months after the end of the study.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria will be: Adults between 40 and 80 years of age. Individuals will be included if they have had a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 virus, presence of dyspnea and/or fatigue greater than 3 months after COVID-19 diagnosis, at least 1 point higher on the modified Medical Research Council Scale (mMRC) compared to the period before infection. All participants must have no contraindications to perform the exercise and training tests and must be able to read, understand and sign the information and consent form.
Exclusion criteria
Individuals with one of the
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events assessed by Cardiorespiratory Capacity | 24 months | The primary outcome of the study will be measured by a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a cycloergometer. The protocol will be individualised and will include a 3-minute warm-up at 20 Watts, followed by an increasing workload of 10-20 W/min (depending on the participant's fitness level) until exhaustion, maintaining a cadence greater than 60 rpm. Electrocardiogram and oxygen saturation will be continuously monitored, while rating of perceived exertion and blood pressure will be measured every two minutes during the test. Continuously measured at rest, as well as during exercise and recovery: minute ventilation, oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. Gas exchange shall be collected on a breath-by-breath basis and expressed as a 15-second time average for analysis. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Psychological profiles | 24 months | Beck Anxiety Scale - consists of a 21-item self-administered instrument in which the patient is asked to report the extent to which he or she has been affected by each of the 21 symptoms described in the scale. Each item has four possible response options: not at all, mildly, moderately and severely. Values from 0 to 3 are assigned to each of the items. The values for each item are summed to obtain a total score that can range from 0 to 63 points. A total between 0 and 7 points is interpreted as a minimum level of anxiety, between 8 to 15 points corresponds to a mild level of anxiety, from 16 to 25 points is moderate anxiety and from 26 to 63 points is considered severe anxiety. |
| Neurocognitive profiles | 24 months | Montreal Cognitive Assessment - This instrument examines cognitive dysfunctions associated with attention, concentration, executive functions (including abstraction capacity), memory, language, visuoconstructive abilities, calculation and orientation. The maximum score is 30 points and its score is proportional to the level of cognitive functionality, so that the lower the score, the greater the cognitive impairment. A score equal to or higher than 26 points is considered normal; a score lower than 10 points implies incipient cognitive impairment; from 20 to 23 points: Mild cognitive impairment and if the patient achieves 26 points or more, there is no alteration of cognitive functions. |
| Cardiorespiratory profiles | 24 months | Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) - The FAS questionnaire consists of 10 questions and its objective is to investigate the presence of fatigue in a patient, its response is by means of a likert-type scale in which higher scores imply a greater degree of fatigue, its measurement parameters are based on two categories whose maximum score is 50 points. FAS scores 10 - 21: no fatigue (normal) FAS scores 22 - 50: substantial fatigue |
| Quality of life indicators | 24 months | Short Form 12 Health Survey - Health related quality of life questionnaire. The response options of the SF-12 form Likert-type scales that evaluate intensity or frequency of quality of life indicators associated with health. The number of response options ranges from three to six, depending on the item, and each question is given a value that is then transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. The scores have a mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10, so that values above 50 indicate better health-related quality of life or below 50 indicate a worse state of health-related quality of life. |
| Nutritional profile | 24 months | Body composition analyzer - This instrument establishes the level of body fat in people, establishing frames of reference with scores differentiated by sex, classifying as low range in men when their score is less than 9.9%, and women less than 17.9%; normal level: Men between 10 to 19.9%, women between 18 to 27.9%; High: Men between 20 to 58%, women between 28.0 to 58%. Therefore, the higher the percentage, the higher the degree of health risks associated with overweight. |
| Functional profiles | 24 months | Barthel Index - It is a test that provides ranges with scores between 0 and 100, regarding the level of functional behavioral independence for a patient. The closer a subject's score is to 0, the more dependent he/she is; the closer to 100, the more independent he/she is. Based on the results obtained in the evaluation with the Barthel Index or Scale, the classification will be: Total Dependent (less than 20 points), Severe Dependence (20 - 35 points), Moderate Dependence (40 - 55 points), Mild Dependence (greater than or equal to 60 points) and Independence (100 points). |
Countries
Chile