Skip to content

Effect of Different E-cigarette Cooling Flavors on Adults' Sensory Experience TCORS 3.0

Examine the Effects of Novel E-cigarette Constituents and Determining Appropriate Concentrations Among Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05932693
Enrollment
31
Registered
2023-07-06
Start date
2024-09-03
Completion date
2025-01-09
Last updated
2026-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

E-Cig Use

Keywords

Cooling components, e-cigarette, menthol, WS-23, WS-3

Brief summary

This pilot sensory experiment will examine cooling from comparable concentrations of WS-3 and menthol to determine appropriate concentrations to use in the main study.

Detailed description

This pilot study will establish low and high concentrations of both WS-3 and menthol concentrations to test in the main study. An anticipated 30 adult e-cigarette users will participate in one laboratory session during which participants will be exposed to e-liquids containing five different concentrations of two different cooling flavors without nicotine (10 e-liquids total). Participants will rate "coolness" using the generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). Using averages of participant ratings, we will select a low concentration of each constituent that is rated as more than "barely detectable" but less than "moderate" to ensure that cooling is weak but clearly perceptible. For the high concentration of each constituent, we will select a concentration that on average falls between "strong" and "very strong" to identify a strong cooling sensation while avoiding sensations that would also be uncomfortable.

Interventions

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-3, 0.05%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants WS-3: 0.05%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-3, 0.1%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants WS-3: 0.1%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-3, 0.5%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants WS-3: 0.5%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-3, 1.0%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants WS-3: 1.0%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-3, 2.0%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants WS-3: 2.0%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (menthol, 0.05%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants menthol: 0.05%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (menthol, 0.1%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants menthol: 0.1%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (menthol, 0.5%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants menthol: 0.5%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (menthol, 1.0%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants menthol: 1.0%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (menthol, 2.0%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to five e-liquid coolants menthol: 2.0%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-23, 0.05%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to six e-liquid coolants WS-23: 0.05%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-23, 0.1%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to six e-liquid coolants WS-23: 0.1%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-23, 0.5%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to six e-liquid coolants WS-23: 0.5%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-23, 1.0%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to six e-liquid coolants WS-23: 1.0%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-23, 2.0%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to six e-liquid coolants WS-23: 2.0%.

OTHERE-liquid coolant (WS-23, 4.0%)

Adult users of e-cigarette will be exposed to six e-liquid coolants WS-23: 4.0%.

Sponsors

Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Participants will be exposed to e-liquids containing 16 conditions (WS-3 block: 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, WS-23 block: 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.0%, and menthol block: 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%) from low concentration to high concentration.

Intervention model description

Participants are exposed to all study conditions (16 e-liquid samples).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older * Able to read and write * Used e-cigarettes containing nicotine * Use e-cigs in past 30 days * No strong dislike of the menthol flavor * Urine cotinine ≥200ng/ml * Willing to abstain from tobacco/nicotine use 2 hrs prior to sessions

Exclusion criteria

* Known hypersensitivity to propylene glycol * Pregnant or lactating females * Uncontrolled asthma * Nut/e-liquid flavorant allergy * Current marijuana (tetrahydrocannabinol) vaping + E-cigarette or vaping use Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) symptoms * Dislike of menthol flavor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Coolness: Score Change in Coolness of Each E-cigarette Condition (16 Conditions in Total)Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (at 10 minutes), then 5 minutes post administration of each e-cigarette condition, up to 85 minutes (condition 16)Difference in overall flavor intensity, coolness, sweetness and harshness/irritation at each e-cigarette condition as measured by the computerized Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). Participants will self-report their responses using a computer mouse to indicate where on the scale response falls. The Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scales (gLMS) are category ratio scales with seven semantic labels: "no sensation", "barely detectable", "weak", "moderate", "strong", "very strong", and "strongest imaginable", positioned quasi-logarithmically as per empirically determined semantic magnitudes on a 0-100 scale (strongest imaginable at the 100 end).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSuchitra Krishnan-Sarin, PhD

Yale University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from the local community and university settings using flyers, email advertisements, and online postings. Individuals who expressed interest were screened for eligibility and checked during intakes, and those meeting inclusion criteria were scheduled for a single laboratory session. A total of 31 eligible participants were enrolled, and 30 completed the study procedures, 27 were analyzed

Pre-assignment details

Prior to completion of the lab session, one participant did not attend (due to no-show) and was therefore excluded from the final dataset. A total of 30 participants completed the laboratory procedures and were assigned to the study conditions.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous33.8 years old
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
E-cigarette use frequency26.0 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic Asian
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic Black
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic White
16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Others
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
EG014
affected / at risk
EG015
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026