Skip to content

A Study to Learn About the Effectiveness of the Medicine Called Elranatamab in People With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Comparative Effectiveness of Elranatamab (PF-06863135) in Clinical Study C1071003 Versus Standard of Care (SOC) in Real-World (RW) External Control Arms in Patients With Triple-Class Refractory (TCR) Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05932290
Enrollment
514
Registered
2023-07-06
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2023-07-12
Last updated
2024-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Myeloma, Multiple Myeloma, relapsed Multiple Myeloma, refractory Multiple Myeloma, PF-06863135, BCMA, bispecific, bispecific antibody, BCMA-CD3 bispecific, Elranatamab, MagnetisMM-3

Brief summary

This study is to understand how well elranatamab (PF-06863135) may be used for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Sometimes MM might improve at first, but then gets resistant to the treatment and starts growing again (known as relapsed refractory). This study medicine will be compared with standard-of-care (SOC) therapies used in real-world clinical practice. For people receiving elranatamab, the investigators will use data from the phase 2 clinical trial (MagnetisMM-3). The investigators will also use data from multiple real-world sources, representing the SOC in clinical practice. This study does not seek any participants for enrollment. The investigators will compare the experiences of people receiving elranatamab to people receiving SOC therapies. This way, it will help the investigators to know how well elranatamab can be used for RRMM treatment.

Interventions

DRUGElranatamab

BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody

DRUGStandard of care

Standard of care

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Weeks to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years and older at index date * Diagnosis of MM * Measurable disease according to IMWG criteria * ECOG performance status ≤2 * Refractory to at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, 1 immunomodulatory drug, and 1 anti-CD38 treatment (ie, triple-class refractory \[TCR\]) * At least 1 treatment following their TCR eligibility

Exclusion criteria

* Acute plasma cell leukemia * Amyloidosis * Smoldering MM * Stem cell transplant within 12 weeks of index or active graft versus host disease (GVHD) * Active malignancy within 3 years before index, except for basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ * Administration with an investigational drug within 30 days prior to index

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW AnalysisC1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first(maximum of 15 months);Flatiron:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/death due to any cause or censoring,whichever occurred first(maximum of 66.9 months)PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A, PFS: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. B) Flatiron Health: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>= 25% from baseline/nadir value in any one or more of the following: an absolute increase in serum M-protein by SPEP by \>= 0.5 g/dL; serum M-protein \>= 1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>= 5 g/dL; an absolute increase in urine M-protein by UPEP by \>=200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, an absolute increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels of \>10 mg/dL. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis.
Progression Free Survival (PFS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted AnalysisC1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 15 months);COTA:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 64.3 months)PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed progressive disease (PD) per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first; b) RWD COTA: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>=25% (Percent) from the lowest response value in any 1 or more of the criteria: serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with an absolute increase \>0.5 gram/deciliter (g/dL); 24-hour(h) urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) with an absolute increase \>200 microgram (mg)/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein, the absolute increase of \>10 mg/dL in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels; or an absolute bone marrow plasma cell \>10%. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months.
PFS: C1071003 Cohort A Versus COTA Cohort- Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW)C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 15 months);COTA:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 64.3 months)PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first; b) COTA: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>=25% from the lowest response value in any 1 or more of the criteria: SPEP with an absolute increase \>0.5 g/dL; 24-hour UPEP with an absolute increase \>200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein, the absolute increase of \>10 mg/dL in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels; or an absolute bone marrow plasma cell percentage \>10%. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months. Participants without an event were censored at date of last adequate disease assessment or the data cut-off. Kaplan Meier method was used.
PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted AnalysisC1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first(maximum of 15 months);Flatiron:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/death due to any cause or censoring,whichever occurred first(maximum of 66.9 months)PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A, PFS: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. B) Flatiron Health: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>= 25% from baseline/nadir value in any one or more of the following: an absolute increase in serum M-protein by SPEP by \>= 0.5 g/dL; serum M-protein \>= 1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>= 5 g/dL; an absolute increase in urine M-protein by UPEP by \>=200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, an absolute increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels of \>10 mg/dL. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted AnalysisC1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); COTA: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 64.3 months)OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; b) COTA Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using IPTW AnalysisC1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); COTA: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 64.3 months)OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; b) COTA Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted AnalysisC1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); Flatiron: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 66.9 months)OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; B) Flatiron Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW AnalysisC1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); Flatiron: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 66.9 months)OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; B) Flatiron Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This retrospective cohort study used participant level data from study C1071003 (NCT04649359), and external control arms identified from real world data (RWD) sources.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
C1071003 Cohort A
Eligible participants with TCR MM, who were BCMA naïve, who were enrolled between 2 February 2021 to 07 January 2022 and who were treated with elranatamab in study C1071003 were included.
123
RWD: COTA
Eligible participants with TCR MM who were treated with SOC therapies in real world clinical practice setting, identified from COTA database were included. This arm served as external control arm.
239
RWD: Flatiron Health
Eligible participants with TCR MM who were treated with SOC therapies in real world clinical practice setting, identified from Flatiron Health database were included. This arm served as external control arm.
152
Total514

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicC1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTARWD: Flatiron HealthTotal
Age, Continuous67.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
68.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
69.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
68.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-white
51 Participants64 Participants50 Participants165 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
72 Participants175 Participants102 Participants349 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants109 Participants72 Participants236 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
68 Participants130 Participants80 Participants278 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
55 / 123171 / 23990 / 152
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

PFS: C1071003 Cohort A Versus COTA Cohort- Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW)

PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first; b) COTA: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>=25% from the lowest response value in any 1 or more of the criteria: SPEP with an absolute increase \>0.5 g/dL; 24-hour UPEP with an absolute increase \>200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein, the absolute increase of \>10 mg/dL in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels; or an absolute bone marrow plasma cell percentage \>10%. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months. Participants without an event were censored at date of last adequate disease assessment or the data cut-off. Kaplan Meier method was used.

Time frame: C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 15 months);COTA:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 64.3 months)

Population: Eligible participants whose data was retrieved and was used in this retrospective cohort study. In this outcome measure, IPTW analysis was applied. IPTW eliminated the effect of confounding by observed baseline participant characteristics, improve covariate balance, and thereby obtained unbiased estimates of treatment effects. IPTW created pseudo-sets, hence Number of Participants Analyzed (N) are different from participant flow and baseline section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C1071003 Cohort APFS: C1071003 Cohort A Versus COTA Cohort- Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW)NA Months
RWD: COTAPFS: C1071003 Cohort A Versus COTA Cohort- Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW)5.26 Months
p-value: 0.000395% CI: [0.22, 0.64]Regression, Cox
Primary

PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis

PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A, PFS: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. B) Flatiron Health: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>= 25% from baseline/nadir value in any one or more of the following: an absolute increase in serum M-protein by SPEP by \>= 0.5 g/dL; serum M-protein \>= 1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>= 5 g/dL; an absolute increase in urine M-protein by UPEP by \>=200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, an absolute increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels of \>10 mg/dL. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis.

Time frame: C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first(maximum of 15 months);Flatiron:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/death due to any cause or censoring,whichever occurred first(maximum of 66.9 months)

Population: Eligible participants whose data was retrieved and was used in this retrospective cohort study. IPTW analysis: eliminated the effect of confounding by observed baseline participant characteristics, improve covariate balance, and thereby obtained unbiased estimates of treatment effects. IPTW created pseudo-sets and N are different from participant and baseline section. Participants without an event were censored at date of last adequate disease assessment or the data cut-off.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C1071003 Cohort APFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW AnalysisNA Months
RWD: COTAPFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis2.79 Months
Primary

PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis

PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A, PFS: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. B) Flatiron Health: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>= 25% from baseline/nadir value in any one or more of the following: an absolute increase in serum M-protein by SPEP by \>= 0.5 g/dL; serum M-protein \>= 1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>= 5 g/dL; an absolute increase in urine M-protein by UPEP by \>=200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, an absolute increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels of \>10 mg/dL. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months.

Time frame: C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first(maximum of 15 months);Flatiron:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/death due to any cause or censoring,whichever occurred first(maximum of 66.9 months)

Population: Eligible participants whose data was retrieved and was used in this retrospective cohort study. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at date of last adequate disease assessment or the data cut-off.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C1071003 Cohort APFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted AnalysisNA Months
RWD: COTAPFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis3.71 Months
Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis

PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed progressive disease (PD) per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first; b) RWD COTA: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>=25% (Percent) from the lowest response value in any 1 or more of the criteria: serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with an absolute increase \>0.5 gram/deciliter (g/dL); 24-hour(h) urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) with an absolute increase \>200 microgram (mg)/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein, the absolute increase of \>10 mg/dL in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels; or an absolute bone marrow plasma cell \>10%. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months.

Time frame: C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 15 months);COTA:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 64.3 months)

Population: Eligible participants whose data was retrieved and was used in this retrospective cohort study. Kaplan Meier method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment or the data cut-off.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C1071003 Cohort AProgression Free Survival (PFS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted AnalysisNA Months
RWD: COTAProgression Free Survival (PFS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis4.70 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.37, 0.71]Regression, Cox
Secondary

OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis

OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; B) Flatiron Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Time frame: C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); Flatiron: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 66.9 months)

Population: Eligible participants whose data was retrieved and was used in this retrospective cohort study. In this outcome measure, IPTW analysis was applied. IPTW eliminated the effect of confounding by observed baseline participant characteristics, improve covariate balance, and thereby obtained unbiased estimates of treatment effects. IPTW created pseudo-sets and Number of Participants Analyzed are different from participant flow and baseline section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C1071003 Cohort AOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW AnalysisNA Months
RWD: COTAOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis11.24 Months
Secondary

OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis

OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; B) Flatiron Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Time frame: C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); Flatiron: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 66.9 months)

Population: Eligible participants whose data was retrieved and was used in this retrospective cohort study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C1071003 Cohort AOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted AnalysisNA Months
RWD: COTAOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis11.24 Months
Secondary

OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using IPTW Analysis

OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; b) COTA Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Time frame: C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); COTA: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 64.3 months)

Population: Eligible participants whose data was retrieved and was used in this retrospective cohort study. In this outcome measure, IPTW analysis was applied. IPTW eliminated the effect of confounding by observed baseline participant characteristics, improve covariate balance, and thereby obtained unbiased estimates of treatment effects. IPTW created pseudo-sets and Number of Participants Analyzed are different from participant flow and baseline section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C1071003 Cohort AOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using IPTW AnalysisNA Months
RWD: COTAOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using IPTW Analysis11.24 Months
p-value: 0.003295% CI: [0.27, 0.77]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis

OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; b) COTA Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Time frame: C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); COTA: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 64.3 months)

Population: Eligible participants whose data was retrieved and was used in this retrospective cohort study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C1071003 Cohort AOverall Survival (OS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted AnalysisNA Months
RWD: COTAOverall Survival (OS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis11.24 Months
p-value: 0.006295% CI: [0.47, 0.88]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026