Multiple Sclerosis
Conditions
Keywords
Telerehabilitation, Speech Therapy, Multiple Sclerosis, Voice Intensity, Hypophonia, Digital Health
Brief summary
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young adults. At least 62% of people with MS have speech, vocal, or communication disorders. Among these, alterations in voice intensity and quality constitute a limitation in MS people's social life leading to experience difficulties in work, conversations, and communication especially in noisy environments or through the telephone. Though voice and speech impairments and speech impairments are widely prevalent in this population, only 2% of the people receive speech therapy. The Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-Loud is a well-documented, efficacious intensive speech intervention, for treating hypophonia in subjects with neurological conditions. Despite the effectiveness of LSVT-Loud treatment on the voice has been reported in MS, several factors prevent the agile use of this method in rehabilitation centers: motor disability, work commitments, and distance barriers may preclude repeated attendance of this intervention at a healthcare facility. Telerehabilitation represents a feasible solution to bypass these potential barriers related to attendance at the rehabilitation programs in the clinic. The increasing evidence sustains the role of telerehabilitation for the migration of care from the clinic to the patient's homes, overcoming several obstacles affecting service accessibility. Previous studies showed the validity and the non-inferiority of LSVT-Loud delivered via telerehabilitation in subjects with Parkinson's Disease, while no pieces of evidence are still available on the efficacy of voice treatment delivered by telerehabilitation in MS. It is plausible to assume that LSVT-Loud delivered by telerehabilitation would be feasible and provide a beneficial effect also for MS non-inferior compared to the same treatment delivered in the clinic.
Detailed description
20 patients with MS will be recruited from IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria detailed in the Eligibility Criteria section. Participants will be randomized into 2 different groups: Group 1: Lee Silverman Voice Treatment - Loud delivered by telerehabilitation at home (Experimental group); Group 2: Lee Silverman Voice Treatment - Loud delivered in the clinic (Control group).
Interventions
OTHERLSVT-Loud delivered by telerehabilitation
LSVT-Loud treatment delivered by telerehabilitation
OTHERLSVT-Loud in the clinic
LSVT-Loud delivered face-to-face in the clinic
Sponsors
Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* diagnosis of MS according to the criteria of MC Donald 2010 (Polman et al., 2011; Thompson et al., 2018) * perceived voice intensity disability and severity of speech and voice disorder prior to treatment (as judged independently by two speech-language pathologists highly experienced with voice and motor speech disorders) * age ≥ 18; * not treated for hypophonia in the six months before enrollment in the study * with a preserved cognitive level at the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE test \>24) (Folstein et al., 1975); * available and able to use a PC with an internet connection at home to access the telerehabilitation sessions; * agreeing to participate with the signature of the informed consent form; * stable drug treatment (last 3 months), if any; * absence of relapses (last month) before taking part in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* presence of dysphonia related to other diseases; * presence of other neurological disorders different from MS; * presence of major psychiatric conditions; * presence of severe impairment of visual and/or acoustic perception; * history of laryngeal cancer, radiotherapy, or head-neck trauma, or intubation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the vocal Intensity during 1-minute monologue dB SPL | Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) | Participants will be requested to speak about daily activities at a comfortable frequency and intensity level. A specific task identical for each participant will be given: Please speak for at least a minute. For monologue (and other acoustic variables described below) recording setup follows published recommendations, mouth-to-microphone distance is kept at 30 cm and we will calculate the mean of the first three recordings and PRAAT software (www.praat.org) will be used to record and analyze voice parameters. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in sustained /a/ voice intensity (dB SPL/a/) | Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment) | Participants' voices will be monitored for a total of 4 hours of consecutive speech. Voice data from daily life will be registered using the Vocal Holter Med (VHM) before and after the interventions. VHM consists of a contact microphone placed in a collar worn around the neck as well as a device for data storage that can be worn in a pocket during the day. The contact microphone measures the skin vibrations caused by the activity of the vocal cords. Besides the voice indicators, also local temperature and relative humidity are measured during monitoring. |
| Change in the vocal Intensity during 1-minute monologue dB SPL | follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of the treatment) | Participants will be requested to speak about daily activities at a comfortable frequency and intensity level. A specific task identical for each participant will be given: Please speak for at least a minute. For monologue (and other acoustic variables described below) recording setup follows published recommendations, mouth-to-microphone distance is kept at 30 cm and we will calculate the mean of the first three recordings and PRAAT software (www.praat.org) will be used to record and analyze voice parameters. |
| Change in the perception of voice as measured by the Voice Handicap Index (VHI, Jacobson et al., 1997) | Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment | VHI is a standardized 30-point questionnaire, divided into three subscales covering functional, emotional, and physical aspects of voice disorders. Participants have to rate each statement using a 5-point scale scored from 0 (never) to 4 (always); the maximum score is 120 (worst score). The value of 12 points on the VHI test should be considered as a threshold for rating the handicap caused by voice disorders. |
| hange in perceived quality of life (especially in cognition, life activities, and participation domain) as measured by the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0; Federici et al., 2017) | Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment | WHODAS 2.0 covers six domains of functioning including Cognition, Mobility, Self-care, Getting along, Life activities, Participation. Scores assigned to each item are on a 5-point scale ranging from (0) none to (4) extreme with higher scores indicating a higher disability. The 36-item version will be administered and both summary scores (score range 0-144 with higher numbers indicating higher disability) and domain-specific scores for the six different functioning domains (especially in cognition, life activities, and participation domain; score range 0-24 for each domain with higher numbers indicating higher disability) will be considered. |
| Protocol adherence | post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) | Synchronous sessions' adherence to the treatment will be registered by the telerehabilitation platform (experimental group) or by the therapist (control group). Asynchronous sessions' attendance will be registered by the completion of the patient's diary. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of adverse events | post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) | Adverse events will be listed in the patient's diary considering both events occurring during the therapy and those occurring outside of the sessions but within the rehabilitation protocol period |
| 4. Perceived rehabilitation engagement, acceptability, feasibility, frequency, and dose adequacy | post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) | Individual and group ad-hoc interviews will be performed during and after the rehabilitation protocol period. |
| Intrinsic Motivation in the rehabilitation program as measured by the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory - Interest/Enjoyment subscale (IMI-IE; McAuley et al., 1989) | post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) | IMI-IE consisted of a pool of 7 items with a 7 points Likert scale ranging from (1) Absolutely Not to (7) Absolutely Yes. A total score (average of the item scores) will be considered. |
| Technological Systems interaction perceived experience as measured by the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ; Schrepp et al., 2017) | post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) | The UEQ is a 26-item scale (semantic differential scale: each item consists of two opposite adjectives, e.g., boring vs. exciting) that allows calculating six different domains: (1) attractiveness (overall impression of the system), (2) perspicuity: easily to learn how to use the system; (3) efficiency (user's effort to solve tasks); (4) dependability (feeling of control of the interaction); (5) stimulation (motivation to use the system); and (6) novelty (innovation and creation of system). The mean of the item score of each domain will be standardized based on a data benchmark (Schrepp et al., 2017). |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed