Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Chloroprocaine 3% Gel and Oxybuprocaine 0.4% Eye Drops Anesthesia in Pediatric Population

A Prospective, Observer-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate and Compare the Clinical Efficacy of Chloroprocaine 3% Gel and Oxybuprocaine 0.4% Eye Drops Anesthesia for Clinical Practice in Pediatric Population

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05926258
Enrollment
74
Registered
2023-07-03
Start date
2024-05-23
Completion date
2025-03-13
Last updated
2026-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local Anesthetic

Keywords

chloroprocaine, eye gel, ocular surface anesthesia

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of Chloroprocaine 3% eye gel compared to Oxybuprocaine 0,4% eye drops when used for inducing ocular surface anesthesia in pediatric patients. 74 Participants (male and female, aged 0-17 yrs) will be 1:1 randomized for receiving either the test drug (Chloroprocaine) or the reference drug (Oxybuprocaine) before undergoing to ocular exam who needs ocular surface anesthesia. The successful surface anesthesia will be evaluated 5 minutes after receiving 2 drops (1 minute apart) of either test or reference drug by an eye spear sponge

Interventions

DRUGChloroprocaine 3% eye gel

ocular surface anesthesia

DRUGOxybuprocaine Hydrochloride 4 Mg/mL Eye Drops

ocular surface anesthesia

Sponsors

Sintetica SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Cross Research S.A.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To be enrolled in this study, patients must fulfil all these inclusion criteria: 1. Age ≥ one day of life (newborn, infant, child) and 17 years included (not anticipated to turn 18 during the study). 2. Female subjects currently either of: * Non-childbearing potential (i.e., premenarchal or physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is surgically sterilized via documented hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation), or * Childbearing potential (i.e., postmenarchal girls): the subject is eligible to enter and participate in this study if she is not lactating, has a negative pregnancy test and agrees to abstain from intercourses or uses a valid contraceptive method until study completion. 3. Signed written informed consent by both parents or legal representative(s) (unless only one has legal authority). Written informed assent for adolescents aged 12-17 years included and, whenever possible, informed assent for children aged 6 to 11 years included. Ability of the subjects and their parents/legal representative(s) to understand and comply with the protocol requirements, study-specified visit schedule and procedures. 4. Scheduled to undergo a routine clinical procedure which needs local ocular surface anesthesia, including but not limited to applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM), ocular ultrasonography, retinal peripheral examination with blepharostat and scleral indentation.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients fulfilling at the inclusion visit one or more of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conjunctiva Anesthesia With Chloroprocaine 3% Eye Gel as Compared With Oxybuprocaine Chlorhydrate 0.4% Eye Dropsday 1Efficacy outcome: assess of patients in each treatment group with a successful conjunctiva anesthesia in the right eye, 5 minutes after study product administration, i.e. right before the ocular examination, to be assessed by eye spear sponge.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Eventsfrom day 1 until study end (day 8 or day 15)Evaluation of safety by assessing the occurrence of adverse events throughout the study
Assessing the Product Global Tolerance Gradedday 1, post doseEvaluation of safety by assessing the product global tolerance graded by the Investigator by answering the following question "How do you consider the study product global tolerance" using the following scale: 0=very unsatisfactory, 1=unsatisfactory, 2= satisfactory, 3=very satisfactory.

Countries

Italy

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
73 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 370 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 370 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 36

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026