Skip to content

Sirolimus in the Treatment of Refractory/Relapsed wAIHA

Sirolimus in the Treatment of Refractory/Relapsed Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA): a Phase 2 Prospective Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05925023
Enrollment
22
Registered
2023-06-29
Start date
2023-06-24
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Keywords

warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Evans syndrome, refractory/relapsed, sirolimus, efficacy

Brief summary

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare and heterogeneous disorder characterized by the destruction of red blood cells through warm or cold antibodies. Glucocorticoid (combined with rituximab) is the first-line treatment. However, the recurrence rate is very high and some patients may not respond to steroids. Second-line therapies include cyclosporine A (CsA), cyclophosphamide, rituximab, azathioprine, and even splenectomy. Our previous study of sirolimus in refractory/relapsed AIHA and ES found an effective rate of 80%. Therefore, the investigators plan to explore the efficacy and safety of sirolimus in the treatment of refractory/relapsed wAIHA.

Detailed description

Based on the optimal autoantibody-RBC reactivity temperatures, AIHA is classified into warm type, cold type, and mixed type. AIHA can be further classified into primary or secondary in nature. Glucocorticoid (combined with rituximab) is the first-line treatment. However, the recurrence rate is very high and some patients may not respond to steroids. Second-line therapies include cyclosporine A (CsA), cyclophosphamide, rituximab, azathioprine, and even splenectomy. The refractory/relapsed wAIHA patients have increased cardiovascular events, increased opportunities for infections, decreased quality of life, and even death. A prospective multi-institutional trial in autoimmune cytopenia found that 8 of 10 patients with AIHA and Evans syndrome respond to sirolimus. Our previous study of sirolimus in refractory/relapsed AIHA and ES also found an effective rate of approximately 80%. Since sirolimus is cheap and accessible, our findings may reduce the economic burden of patients and be a guide on the selection of second-line treatment drugs in refractory/relapsed wAIHA and Evans syndrome.

Interventions

DRUGSirolimus

Oral administration, 1-3 mg/d, sirolimus plasma concentration: 4-15 ng/mL

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years old. 2. Diagnosed as primary warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia or Evans syndrome (primary or secondary). There is no treatment indication of other systemic involvement in the original disease if secondary. 3. No response to glucocorticoid therapy or recurrence. 4. Baseline liver (ALT, AST) was less than 2 times the normal value. 5. No active infection; Not pregnant or breastfeeding. 6. Agree to sign the consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with connective tissue disease or other organs involvement 2. Infection or bleeding that cannot be controlled by standard treatment. 3. Active HIV, HCV or HBV infection or cirrhosis or portal hypertension. 4. Progressed uncontrolled malignant tumors and lymphoma 5. Cirrhosis or portal hypertension. 6. Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR)3,6,12 monthsORR defined as the proportion of patients who met the criteria of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events and the number of relapses12 months, end of the follow-upNumber of participants with treatment-related adverse events and the number of relapses
Adverse events3,6,12 monthsSafety analyses include assessments of the incidence and severity of adverse events; all adverse events that occurred or worsened during the treatment period will be reported, as well as adverse events that occurred later but are considered by the investigator to be related to the trial drug.
Relapse rate3,6,12 monthsRelapse rate defined as the proportion of patients whose response shift from PR or CR to no response (NR).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026