Skip to content

Treatment Satisfaction and Treatment Adherence of Diabetic Women Through the Use of FGM

Prospective, Randomized Pilot Study to Improve the Treatment Satisfaction and Treatment Adherence of Diabetic Women Through the Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring Systems

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05924724
Acronym
Flash
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-06-29
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gestational Diabetes, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy

Keywords

Gestational Diabetes, GDM, FGM, Flash Glucose Monitoring, SMBG, self monitoring of blood glucose

Brief summary

The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a glucose tolerance disorder during pregnancy, is increasing. In Germany, it reached 8.58 % in 2019. Standardized treatment has reduced complications for mother and child. Blood self-measurement is currently used to monitor glucose levels, but it is burdensome and disliked by patients. Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) was approved in 2017, but its routine use lacks sufficient data. This pilot project aims to study the impact of FGM on patient satisfaction and adherence to therapy. The hypothesis is that FGM will improve patient experience and increase therapy adherence. The study will include 100 GDM-diagnosed women who will be randomly assigned to FGM or SMBG treatment. The primary endpoint is treatment satisfaction and adherence, measured through step count, physical activity, food error count, and weight gain. The project aims to provide data for patient-centered decision-making on glucose monitoring systems, following the principles of the Association of Diabetes Counseling and Training Professions in Germany (VDBD).

Detailed description

The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), defined as a glucose tolerance disorder diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy, is steadily increasing, reaching 8.58 % in Germany in 2019, according to figures from the Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Health Care (IQTIG). Standardized guideline-compliant treatment has significantly reduced the rate of perinatal complications for both mother and child. A central component of management is the adjustment of blood glucose levels to the specified target values. To date, patients' glucose levels have been determined by blood self-measurement (SMBG) in accordance with guidelines. The diagnosis of GDM and the subsequent management is perceived by the patients as an enormous burden, especially because of the self-measurement, which is perceived as time-consuming, painful and stigmatizing. Since 2017, the Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) has been approved for use in the care of pregnant diabetic women. Its use by gestational diabetics is critically discussed. To date, there is a lack of systematically collected data on the use of FGM in the care of GDM patients that would justify its routine use. The aim of the pilot project planned here is to investigate the influence of FGM on patient satisfaction and adherence to therapy. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the FGM relieves the affected women decisively and mediated by biofeedback leads to more therapy adherence. These data will be used to plan a multicenter study. At the Competence Center for Diabetes and Pregnancy of the University Hospital Jena, 100 women diagnosed with GDM will be included in a randomized controlled trial and will be treated with either FGM (n = 50) or SMBG (n = 50) and followed up according to the guidelines. The primary endpoint is the assessment of treatment satisfaction and adherence using the following measures: step count, physical activity (IPAQ), food error count and weight gain. In order to meet the principle In the sense of a patient-centered individual therapy, the affected persons should be involved in the decision for or against a glucose monitoring system of the Association of Diabetes Counseling and Training Professions in Germany (VDBD), the aim of our project is to create a data basis for this.

Interventions

The FGM is a non-invasive device typically worn on the upper arm, designed to continuously measure blood glucose levels without the need for fingerstick capillary measurements.

Sponsors

Jena University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

prospective randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* written informed consent * age above 18 years * single cephalic pregnancy * newly diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus * 24+0 - 30+0 weeks of gestation

Exclusion criteria

* severe pregnancy complications * severe fetal malformations * rejection of FGM device by health care provider * existing diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) * glucose metabolism affecting diseases * bariatric surgeries in the past

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment SatisfactionThe questionnaire will be filled by the participant during 33 to 35 weeks of gestation.The treatment satisfaction is anticipated to be evaluated using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change (DTSQc) with minimal value of -18 and maximal value of 18, with higher values indicating more satisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Step Count per Daydaily starting at 24 weeks of gestation until deliveryStep count will be documented by the participant and will be evaluated as progression. It is advised, that patients diagnosed with diabetes aim to increase their step count.
Activity in the last 7 daysevery two weeks starting at 24 weeks of gestation until deliveryThe activity is evaluated using the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). The Score provides the metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-minutes per week in total, with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100.000 MET-min/week. Higher score indicate higher activity.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactYvonne Heimann, M. Sc.
yvonne.heimann@med.uni-jena.de+49 3641 9 390 868

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026