Skip to content

Changing Tactics? Optimizing ECT in Difficult-to-treat Depression

Changing Tactics? Optimizing ECT in Difficult-to-treat Depression: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuation of Right Unilateral ECT and Switching to Bitemporal ECT in Case of Early Non-response During an Acute Course of ECT for Difficult-to-treat Depression

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05923801
Acronym
ChaT
Enrollment
196
Registered
2023-06-28
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2026-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Electroconvulsive Therapy, Depression, Cognition

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to address which treatment strategy (continue right unilateral (RUL) ECT or switch to bitemporal (BT) ECT speeds up recovery and has the least impact on memory function, in case of early non-response during an acute course of ECT for difficult-to-treat depression. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Assess the antidepressant efficacy and cognitive impact of the continuation of an ongoing treatment with RUL ECT compared to switching the treatment technique to BT ECT, in patients failing to show an early response to an acute course of ECT for major depression; * Assess group and subject-specific trajectories of depressive symptom severity and neurocognitive performance during the acute ECT course and up to 3 months post-treatment. Participants treated with ECT for depression, showing no 'response' (≥50 percent decrease in depressive symptom severity compared to baseline) after 4 treatment sessions, will be randomized to either switch to BT ECT or continue with RUL ECT. Mood and neurocognitive assessments will be performed at baseline, after 4 ECT sessions (before randomization), after 8 ECT sessions, at the end of the acute course and 3 month after the acute course.

Interventions

DEVICEswitch to BT electrode position

use of different electrode positions of ECT device

DEVICEcontinue with RUL electrode position

use of different electrode positions of ECT device

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER
Universiteit Antwerpen
CollaboratorOTHER
AZ Sint-Jan AV
CollaboratorOTHER
General Hospital Groeninge
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Participants treated with ECT for depression, showing no 'response' (≥50 percent decrease in depressive symptom severity compared to baseline) after 4 treatment sessions will be randomized into 2 treatment groups: either continuation with RUL ECT or switch to BT ECT.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures * Age 18 or older * Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (DSM-5 296.21-30) or bipolar disorder, depressed (DSM-5 296.51-54; 296.84).

Exclusion criteria

* Contra-indication for general anesthesia * Non-Dutch speaking * Diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia * Diagnosis of substance use disorder in the past six months * Diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder or intellectual disability alongside a MoCA score \<23 * Previous ECT course in the past three months * Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product or device * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change form baseline Depressive Symptom Severityafter 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks)mean scores on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR)
Depressive Symptom Severityat the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks)mean scores on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR)
Autobiographical Memoryafter 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks)Mean scores on the Colombia University Autobiographical Memory Interview Short Form (CU-AMI-SF)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response/remission statusat the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks)number of participants with an 50 percent decrease in IDS-score/ IDS-score \< 12
number of ECT treatments needed to achieve response/remissionat the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks)
Neurocognitive performance (RAVLT)after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute coursemean scores on RAVLT (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test)
Neurocognitive performance (MoCA)after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute coursemean scores on MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
Neurocognitive performance (COWAT)after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute coursemean scores on COWAT (Controlled Oral Word Association Test)
Neurocognitive performance (WMS-R)after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute coursemean scores on WMS-R (Wechsler Memory Scale) (Cijferreeksen)

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

CONTACTPascal Sienaert, MD,PhD
pascal.sienaert@upckuleuven.be+322 758 05 11
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPascal Sienaert, MD, PhD

UPC KU Leuven

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 12, 2026