Molar, Third
Conditions
Keywords
pain, trismus, analgesia, ketamine, Ibuprofen
Brief summary
The goal of the clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of ibuprofen, ketamine, and their combination in managing postoperative pain and trismus following third molar surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: which is the best way to control pain and trismus after third molar surgery?
Detailed description
Materials and methods The study will comprise 100 individuals who requested to have their mandibular third molar tooth extracted at the Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry. Participants were randomly allocated into four groups, with 25 patients in each group. The first group (Intrafen group): Each patient in this group will be administered intravenous Ibuprofen (400 mg/8 ml i.v. infusion) for pre-emptive analgesic effect 60 minutes before surgical third molar extraction. Before the procedure, patients will be given local anesthesia using a mixture of 2 ml of local anesthetic (Ultracain Ds Fort 2 ml) plus 3 ml of saline solution (Poliflex 0.9% isotonic 100 ml solution). The impacted third molars of the patients will be removed. The second group (Ketamine group): Each patient in this group will be administered intravenous 100 ml saline (Poliflex 0.9% isotonic 100 ml solution) for a placebo effect 60 minutes before surgical third molar extraction. Before the procedure, patients will be given local anesthesia using a mixture of 2 ml of local anesthetic (Ultracain Ds Fort 2 ml) plus 3 ml of saline solution (Poliflex 0.9% isotonic 100 ml solution) plus 0,3 mg/kg of ketamine (Ketalar 500 mg). The impacted third molars of the patients will be removed. The third group (Combined group): Each patient in this group will be administered intravenous Ibuprofen (400 mg/8 ml i.v. infusion) for pre-emptive analgesic effect 60 minutes before surgical third molar extraction. Before the procedure, patients will be given local anesthesia using a mixture of 2 ml of local anesthetic (Ultracain Ds Fort 2 ml) plus 3 ml of saline solution (Poliflex 0.9% isotonic 100 ml solution) plus 0,3 mg/kg of ketamine (Ketalar 500 mg). The impacted third molars of the patients will be removed. The fourth group (Control group): Each patient in this group will be administered intravenous 100 ml saline (Poliflex 0.9% isotonic 100 ml solution) for a placebo effect 60 minutes before surgical third molar extraction. Before the procedure, patients will be given local anesthesia using a mixture of 2 ml of local anesthetic (Ultracain Ds Fort 2 ml) plus 3 ml of saline solution (Poliflex 0.9% isotonic 100 ml solution). The impacted third molars of the patients will be removed.
Interventions
The surgery was performed using the classic technique: ten minutes after anesthesia administration, a horizontal and sulcular incision was performed, and a mucoperiosteal envelope flap was elevated. The bone covering the impacted third molar tooth was removed with the use of a surgical handpiece and rotary instrument. During the operation, saline water was applied to the surgical drill with a second hand to protect the bone from developing a high temperature. After extraction of the third molar, the cavity was treated with curettage, irrigated with saline, and sutured.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with a fully embedded third molar tooth in the mandible * Patients with regular attendance for routine follow up * Patients with a healthy general systemic condition
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with a fully erupted or partially embedded third molar tooth in the mandible * Patients who have previously experienced allergies to NSAIDs, local anesthetics, and ketamine * Pregnant or breastfeeding patients * Patients who have recently used a different group of NSAIDs for a different condition
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The pain level measurement after impacted third molar surgery will be assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) in all groups. | The pain level measurements of all patients will be evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS) two hours following impacted third molar surgery. [All study participants were asked to record their pain levels two hours after surgery]. | VAS (Pain intensity was assessed on a 100-mm visual analoge scale, where 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain) |
| The limitation of mouth opening (trismus) after third molar surgery will be measured in all groups. | The limitation of mouth opening (trismus) after third molar surgery will be measured in all groups. [The maximum mouth opening of all study participants will be measured and recorded before surgery]. | Trismus was evaluated preoperatively by measuring the distance between the mesial-incisal corners of the upper and lower right central incisors at the maximum opening of the jaws. |
| The limitation of mouth opening (trismus) after third molar surgery will be measured in all groups | The limitation of mouth opening (trismus) after third molar surgery will be measured in all groups. [The maximum mouth opening of all study participants will be measured and recorded two days after the surgery]. | Trismus was evaluated on the second day postoperatively by measuring the distance between the mesial-incisal corners of the upper and lower right central incisors at the maximum opening of the jaws. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The secondary outcome measure is the amount of rescue analgesia used by all participants after impacted third molar tooth surgery. | The mean amount of rescue analgesia used by all participants within the first 24 hours after surgery will be calculated. | All study participants will record the dose of rescue analgesic medicine (Paracetamol 500 mg) at home if they need to take it within 24 hours following surgery. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)