Skip to content

Clarifying Misbeliefs About Hydroxychloroquine: Developing a Decision Aid for Patients With Lupus

Clarifying Misbeliefs About Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ): Developing an Individualized Decision Aid for Diverse Patients With Lupus (HCQ-IDEAL)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05922722
Acronym
HCQ-IDEAL
Enrollment
200
Registered
2023-06-28
Start date
2024-02-15
Completion date
2025-02-20
Last updated
2025-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus

Keywords

hydroxychloroquine

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to collect information from lupus patients about their experience with a tool that informs patients about the benefits vs. harms of a medication such as hydroxychloroquine. The main question it aims to answer is whether the decision-making tool will increase medication adherence. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires that assess their understanding of the decision-making tool.

Detailed description

This study will be no different from a routine lupus or lupus nephritis clinic visit. During the same visit that a participant routinely does for lupus with their healthcare team, a healthcare team member will discuss the tool that elaborates the benefits vs. risks of lupus medications such as hydroxychloroquine. Participants will complete questionnaires that assesses their understanding of the medication (hydroxychloroquine) before and after they complete the discussion regarding the medication using the tool with the healthcare team member. Study team members will study the data collected to answer research questions. They will analyze the data and plan better steps improve care quality in lupus.

Interventions

The shared decision-making tool is a paper tool or an electronic version which will be available in the clinics for clinic team's use.

OTHERQuestionnaire

Questionnaire to assess participant's understanding of the decision-making tool

Sponsors

University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥ 18 years * validated SLE diagnosis * no absolute contraindication to HCQ (e.g., retinopathy) * prior HCQ therapy for at least 3-6 months

Exclusion criteria

* participants with other autoimmune diseases * participants who are not taking HCQ

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in proportion of adherent participants - blood levelsBaseline to 6 monthsCompare the proportion of adherent patients through blood levels (Adherence = 500 ng/ml or higher) at baseline v 6 months after completing intervention
Change in medication adherence - blood levelsBaseline to 3 monthsCompare mean adherence at baseline and three months after completing the intervention. Mean adherence will be measured using blood levels (adherence = 500 ng/ml or higher)
Change in proportion of adherent participantsBaseline to 6 monthsCompare the proportion of adherent patients (Adherence = PDC ≥ 80%) at baseline v 6 months after completing intervention
Change in proportion of adherent participants - participant reportedBaseline to 6 monthsCompare the proportion of adherent patients (Adherence = 80% prescription refills) at baseline v 6 months after completing intervention
Change in medication adherence - participant reportedBaseline to 3 monthsCompare mean adherence at baseline and three months after completing the intervention. Mean adherence will be measured using participant self-report (adherence = 80% prescriptions refilled)
Change in medication adherenceBaseline to 3 monthsCompare mean adherence at baseline and three months after completing the intervention. Mean adherence will be measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC). PDC is calculated using prescription refill data (PDC = Sum of days covered/number of days in the observation period)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess participant satisfaction with decision-making toolPost-intervention, on average 6 monthsParticipant satisfaction using a Likert scale 0-7 (7=most satisfied)
Intervention completionDuration of study, up to 12 monthsTotal number of visits with participants completing the intervention during the study period
Change in decisional conflict scoresBaseline to 6 monthsDecisional conflict scores range from 0 (best) to 1 (worst) with 0.25 as an indicator of residual decisional conflict.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026