Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder, intervention
Brief summary
This study seeks to provide information regarding the effectiveness of a virtual, synchronous cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) group program for women with Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder/Genitopelvic Dysesthesia (PGAD/GPD). The program consists of 8 weekly sessions of two hours each, which focus on education and understanding, and learning skills and strategies to manage PGAD/GPD symptoms, and related mental health and lifestyle impacts, as well as structured opportunities for discussion and shared reflection. The group therapy program involves elements based in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT). Participants in the present study will provide responses to online surveys (before, during, and immediately after treatment, also 3 and 6 months after treatment) regarding their PGAD/GPD symptoms, mental health symptoms, and sexual wellness (sexual pleasure and distress).
Interventions
The group therapy program (virtual, synchronous) involves elements based in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* at least 18 years of age * fluent in English * have a physician-based diagnosis of PGAD/GPD * reside in Ontario, Canada * be comfortable answering questions about their health (mental and physical) and sexuality in online surveys * be comfortable discussing their mental and physical health and PGAD/GPD symptoms in group online therapy sessions with video on
Exclusion criteria
* under the age of 18 years * nonfluent in English * lack of physician based diagnosis of PGAD/GPD * not comfortable with answering questions about mental, physical, sexual health * not comfortable with discussing mental and physical health and PGAD/GPD symptoms in group online therapy sessions with video on * mental or physical health conditions that preclude involvement in group therapy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Symptom intensity | Baseline | Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse. |
| Symptom distress | Baseline | Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Symptom catastrophizing | Baseline | Pain Catastrophizing Scale, adapted to symptoms. Range is 0-52. Higher scores are worse. |
| Symptom self-efficacy | Baseline | Pain Self-Efficacy Scale, adapted to symptoms. Range is 0-60. Higher scores are better. |
| Resilience | Baseline | Brief Resilience Scale. Range is 6-30. Higher scores are better. |
Countries
Canada
Contacts
Queen's University