Acute Heart Failure, Emergencies
Conditions
Brief summary
Evaluate the impact the application of the MESSI-AHF scale (a risk stratification scale specifically derived and validated in patients diagnosed with acute heart failure, AHF) in decision making (admission vs. discharge) by emergency physicians in emergency departments (ED) and its potential impact on on the short-term prognosis of patients with AHF.
Detailed description
Study 1: A non-intervention study involving the consecutive inclusion of 3,200 patients with AHF in 16 Spanish EDs managed according to the usual practice. Individual risk will be retrospectively stratified according to the MEESSI-AHF scale, and we will analyze the distribution of the categories of risk in patients admitted and discharged and the prognosis of patients with low risk discharged from the ED and compare the events observed in this subgroup of patients with the recommended international standards. Study 2: This is a cuasiexperimental study in 8 EDs with consecutive inclusion of 1,600 patients with AHF managed according to the usual practice (without stratification of risk, pre-phase) and 1,600 patients managed after the implementation of the MEESSI-AHF scales for risk stratification before the final decision making in the ED (post-phase). If the patient has low risk the calculator will propose discharge; for the remaining categories of risk the calculator will propose patient admission. The final decision corresponds to the attending physician and if this decision differs from what was proposed, a reason will be given. Study 3: Open multicentre (8 EDs) randomized clinical trial (1:1) comparing the results obtained in the patients randomized to usual clinical practice (1,600 patients) with those obtained in the patients randomized to the use of the MEESSI-AHF scale for risk stratification (1,600 patients) prior to decision making. The dynamics of the decision proposed by the scale will be the same as that in Study 2. Main outcomes (Studies 1, 2, 3): Death (by any cause and cardiovascular cause) at 30 days and at 1 year; combined event (revisit to the ED or hospitalization for AHF or death) at 30 days post-discharge (global analysis of all the patients with AHF stratified by categories of risk); days alive and outside the hospital at 30 days after the index event (consultation to the ED); and proportion of patients managed without hospitalization.
Interventions
PROCEDURERisk stratification before decision-making about patient hospitalization or discharge
Once AHF has been diagnosed at ED, and before decision-making about hospitalize/discharge home is taken, physicians will objectively measure the severity of decompensation, based on risk of 30-day death using MEESSI scale. As result, patient can be allocated to low, intermediate, high or very-high risk. For patients classified as low-risk, the propocol recommendation will be discharge patient to home. For patients classified as increased risk (i.e., intermediate, high or very-high risk categories), the protocol recommendation will be to hospitalize patient. Nonetheless, final decission will be left to emergency physician, and overruling (disposition against recommendation) will be allowed.
Sponsors
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Open-lable, multicentre, randomized, low-intervention, non-pharmacological, clinical trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of AHF based on Framinham criteria * NT-proBNP \>300 pg/mL * Patient able to consent
Exclusion criteria
* ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Days alive and out of hospital | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | Number of days with patient staying out of hospital (it can be at home, et residencial nursing house, etc., but not at hospital) from randomization (day 0) to day 30. |
| 30-day all cause death | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | Death for any cause since patient randomization (day 0) to day 30 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ED revisit due to AHF within the 30 days after discharge | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | Event will be considered if patient present ED revisit due to AHF from the time of discharge (from ED or after hospitalization, day 0) to day 30. Accordingly, patients dying during index event (in-hospital mortality) did not account for this outcome. |
| All-cause death within the 30 days after discharge | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | Event will be considered if patient dies from the time of discharge (from ED or after hospitalization, day 0) to day 30. Accordingly, patients dying during index event (in-hospital mortality) did not account for this outcome. |
| Proportion of patients with AHF managed without hospitalization. | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | We will calcultate the percentage of patients with AHF that are entirely managed in the ED and sent home, without hospitalization |
| Hospitalization due to AHF within the 30 days after discharge | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | Event will be considered if patient is hospitalized due to AHF from the time of discharge (from ED or after hospitalization, day 0) to day 30. Accordingly, patients dying during index event (in-hospital mortality) did not account for this outcome. |
| Composite endpoint withing 30 days after discharge (ED revisit due to AHF, hospitalization due to AHF or all-cause death) | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | Event will be considered if patient present ED revisit due to AHF, hospitalization due to AHF or all-cause death from the time of discharge (from ED or after hospitalization, day 0) to day 30. Accordingly, patients dying during index event (in-hospital mortality) did not account for this outcome. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Analysis of causes of overruling | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | Causes of overruling will be analyzed |
| Sensitivity analysis per protocol | Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year | All previous analyses will be made just using patients of the intervention arm that were managed according to recommendation provided after risk stratification with MEESSI scale (i.e., disregarding patients for whom recommendation was overruled by the emergency physician) |
Countries
Spain
Contacts
Primary ContactOscar Miro, PhD
Outcome results
None listed