Skip to content

A Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety With LEO 90100 Compared With Daivobet® Ointment in Adult Chinese Subjects With Stable Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3, Randomised, Investigator-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Multicentre Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 4-weeks Treatment With LEO 90100 and Daivobet® Ointment in Adult Chinese Subjects With Stable Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05919082
Enrollment
604
Registered
2023-06-26
Start date
2023-06-21
Completion date
2024-03-05
Last updated
2025-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stable Plaque Psoriasis

Keywords

Stable plaque psoriasis, Vitamin D analogue, Native Chinese subjects

Brief summary

This study is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of LEO 90100 when used on the body for the treatment of stable plaque psoriasis in native adult Chinese subjects, compared to Daivobet® ointment.

Detailed description

This study is phase 3, randomised, prospective, investigator-blinded, active-controlled, parallel group, multicentre trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 weeks treatment with LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment. Eligible participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either LEO 90100 or Daivobet® ointment treatment. The trial will last for 6 weeks to 10 weeks for each participant, which includes wash out period and treatment period of up to 4 weeks and a safety follow up period of 2 weeks.

Interventions

Subjects will apply LEO 90100 topically; up to 15 g per day (or 105 g per week).

Subjects will apply Daivobet® ointment topically; up to 15 g per day (or 105 g per week).

Sponsors

LEO Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chinese native * Aged 18 or over * A clinical diagnosis of stable plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months * Stable plaque psoriasis on the trunk and/or limbs (excluding psoriasis on the face, scalp, genitals, and skin folds) involving 2-30% of the body surface at Day 1 (Visit 2) of the trial. * Having a Physician Global Assessment of at least 'mild' at Day 1 (Visit 2) * An mPASI score of at least 2 on the trunk and/or limbs at Day 1 (Visit 2) * Women of childbearing potential must use an adequate form of birth control throughout the trial and for at least 8 weeks after last administration of IMP * Male subjects with a female partner of childbearing potential must use adequate contraceptive methods (adequate contraceptive measures as required by local regulation or practice) * Having a signed and dated informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic use of biological treatments with a potential effect on psoriasis vulgaris within the specified time periods prior to treatment assignment (depending on treatment) * Systemic treatments with all therapies other than biological treatments with a potential effect on psoriasis vulgaris within 4 weeks prior to treatment assignment * Psoralen combined with ultraviolet A therapy (PUVA) within 4 weeks prior to treatment assignment * Systemic treatment with Apremilast within 4 weeks prior to treatment assignment * Ultraviolet B (UVB) therapy within 2 weeks prior to treatment assignment * Topical treatment of psoriasis with strong corticosteroids within 2 weeks prior to treatment assignment * Topical treatment of psoriasis with traditional Chinese medicine within 2 weeks prior to treatment assignment * Treatment with any non-marketed drug substance (any agent which has not yet been made available for clinical use) within 4 weeks/5 half-lives prior to treatment assignment * Any other topical treatment that could affect plaque psoriasis within 2 weeks prior to treatment assignment * Current diagnosis of guttate, erythrodermic, exfoliative, pustular or unstable psoriasis * Patients with any of the following conditions present on any skin area: viral lesions, fungal and bacterial skin infections, parasitic infections, skin manifestations in relation to syphilis or tuberculosis, rosacea, acne vulgaris, acne rosacea, atrophic skin, striae atrophicae, fragility of skin veins, ichthyosis, ulcers and wounds * Disorders of calcium metabolism * Renal insufficiency, hepatic disorders or severe heart disease * Cushing's disease or Addison's disease * Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any component(s) of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) * Current participation in any other interventional clinical trial * Previously screened in this trial * Participation in another clinical trial within 4 weeks prior to treatment assignment * Women who are pregnant, wishing to become pregnant or are breast-feeding * Chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 12 months prior to screening, or any condition associated with poor compliance * Employees of the trial site or any other individuals directly involved with the planning or conduct of the trial, or immediate family members of such individuals

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Day 29, With at Least a 2-point Reduction From BaselineOn Day 29The efficacy of LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment on severity and extent of stable plaque psoriasis was evaluated. The PGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of psoriasis. It is a 5-point scale measurement ranging from 0 to 4, where 0- clear, 1- almost clear, 2- mild, 3- moderate and 4- severe; based on degree of plaque thickening, scaling and erythema. Higher score showed worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index of at Least 75% (mPASI-75) From Baseline to Day 29From Baseline to Day 29The efficacy of LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment on severity and extent of stable plaque psoriasis was evaluated. The extent of psoriatic involvement will be recorded for each of the areas (trunk \[including the neck\] and the limbs \[such as arms and legs\]; excluding any involvement on face, scalp, genitals and skin folds) using the following scale: 0=no involvement, 1=\< 10%, 2=10%-29%, 3=30%-49%, 4=50%-69%, 5=70%-89%, 6=90%-100%. The severity of the psoriatic lesions in each of the areas will be recorded for each of the clinical signs of redness, thickness and scaliness. Each clinical sign is scored on a scale of 0-4, reflecting the average severity of all psoriatic lesions on the given body region. Higher score indicates more severity. The overall mPASI can range from 0 to 64.8.
Percentage of Participants With Decrease in mPASI of at Least 90% (mPASI-90) From Baseline to Day 29From Baseline to Day 29The efficacy of LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment on severity and extent of stable plaque psoriasis was evaluated. The extent of psoriatic involvement will be recorded for each of the areas (trunk \[including the neck\] and the limbs \[such as arms and legs\]; excluding any involvement on face, scalp, genitals and skin folds) using the following scale: 0=no involvement, 1=\< 10%, 2=10%-29%, 3=30%-49%, 4=50%-69%, 5=70%-89%, 6=90%-100%. The severity of the psoriatic lesions in each of the areas will be recorded for each of the clinical signs of redness, thickness and scaliness. Each clinical sign is scored on a scale of 0-4, reflecting the average severity of all psoriatic lesions on the given body region. Higher score indicates more severity. The overall mPASI can range from 0 to 64.8.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From Baseline to Day 43The safety of LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment treating stable plaque psoriasis was evaluated. Only treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) have been reported for this outcome measure. An event was considered treatment-emergent if it started after the first investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration or if it started before the first IMP administration and worsened in severity after the first IMP administration.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 39 sites that enrolled participants in China from 21 June 2023 to 05 March 2024.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled to the study. All study assessments were performed as per the schedule of assessment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LEO 90100
The participants received up to 15 g LEO 90100 foam once daily for 4 weeks.
302
Daivobet Ointment
The participants received up to 15 g Daivobet® ointment once daily for 4 weeks.
302
Total604

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event30
Overall StudyInvestigator Decision10
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject89

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLEO 90100Daivobet OintmentTotal
Age, Continuous45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.45
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.07
45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.25
Age, Customized
<=18 years
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
29 Participants23 Participants52 Participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
273 Participants276 Participants549 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Chinese
302 Participants302 Participants604 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
78 Participants88 Participants166 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
224 Participants214 Participants438 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3000 / 301
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 30039 / 301
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 3000 / 301

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Day 29, With at Least a 2-point Reduction From Baseline

The efficacy of LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment on severity and extent of stable plaque psoriasis was evaluated. The PGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of psoriasis. It is a 5-point scale measurement ranging from 0 to 4, where 0- clear, 1- almost clear, 2- mild, 3- moderate and 4- severe; based on degree of plaque thickening, scaling and erythema. Higher score showed worse outcome.

Time frame: On Day 29

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LEO 90100Percentage of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Day 29, With at Least a 2-point Reduction From Baseline50.0 Percentage of Participants
Daivobet® OintmentPercentage of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Day 29, With at Least a 2-point Reduction From Baseline42.4 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.043895% CI: [1.01, 1.99]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

The safety of LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment treating stable plaque psoriasis was evaluated. Only treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) have been reported for this outcome measure. An event was considered treatment-emergent if it started after the first investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration or if it started before the first IMP administration and worsened in severity after the first IMP administration.

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 43

Population: All participants who are exposed to the IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LEO 90100Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE77 Participants
LEO 90100Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leading to Deaths0 Participants
LEO 90100Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious4 Participants
LEO 90100Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Non-Serious75 Participants
LEO 90100Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leading to Permanent Discontinuation from investigational medicinal product (IMP)3 Participants
LEO 90100Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leading to Withdrawals from the Trial3 Participants
Daivobet® OintmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leading to Permanent Discontinuation from investigational medicinal product (IMP)0 Participants
Daivobet® OintmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE68 Participants
Daivobet® OintmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Non-Serious68 Participants
Daivobet® OintmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leading to Deaths0 Participants
Daivobet® OintmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leading to Withdrawals from the Trial0 Participants
Daivobet® OintmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index of at Least 75% (mPASI-75) From Baseline to Day 29

The efficacy of LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment on severity and extent of stable plaque psoriasis was evaluated. The extent of psoriatic involvement will be recorded for each of the areas (trunk \[including the neck\] and the limbs \[such as arms and legs\]; excluding any involvement on face, scalp, genitals and skin folds) using the following scale: 0=no involvement, 1=\< 10%, 2=10%-29%, 3=30%-49%, 4=50%-69%, 5=70%-89%, 6=90%-100%. The severity of the psoriatic lesions in each of the areas will be recorded for each of the clinical signs of redness, thickness and scaliness. Each clinical sign is scored on a scale of 0-4, reflecting the average severity of all psoriatic lesions on the given body region. Higher score indicates more severity. The overall mPASI can range from 0 to 64.8.

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LEO 90100Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index of at Least 75% (mPASI-75) From Baseline to Day 2963.6 Percentage of Participants
Daivobet® OintmentPercentage of Participants With Decrease in Modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index of at Least 75% (mPASI-75) From Baseline to Day 2953.6 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.010895% CI: [1.1, 2.12]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Decrease in mPASI of at Least 90% (mPASI-90) From Baseline to Day 29

The efficacy of LEO 90100 compared with Daivobet® ointment on severity and extent of stable plaque psoriasis was evaluated. The extent of psoriatic involvement will be recorded for each of the areas (trunk \[including the neck\] and the limbs \[such as arms and legs\]; excluding any involvement on face, scalp, genitals and skin folds) using the following scale: 0=no involvement, 1=\< 10%, 2=10%-29%, 3=30%-49%, 4=50%-69%, 5=70%-89%, 6=90%-100%. The severity of the psoriatic lesions in each of the areas will be recorded for each of the clinical signs of redness, thickness and scaliness. Each clinical sign is scored on a scale of 0-4, reflecting the average severity of all psoriatic lesions on the given body region. Higher score indicates more severity. The overall mPASI can range from 0 to 64.8.

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LEO 90100Percentage of Participants With Decrease in mPASI of at Least 90% (mPASI-90) From Baseline to Day 2933.1 Percentage of Participants
Daivobet® OintmentPercentage of Participants With Decrease in mPASI of at Least 90% (mPASI-90) From Baseline to Day 2924.5 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.019995% CI: [1.07, 2.19]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026