Low Back Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of Mat Pilates with General Exercises in treating patients with nonspecific acute low back pain. Novelty: Pilates, typically performed with specific equipment, has shown clinically significant treatment effects in people with chronic low back pain. Recent guidelines recommend patients remain active during episodes of low back pain; however, evidence regarding the type of exercise to perform is limited. Mat Pilates is a type of Pilates exercise that does not require complex equipment. Evaluating the effectiveness of two simple exercise methods (Mat Pilates and General Exercises) can help expand intervention options for patients with acute low back pain, enabling them to choose an exercise they enjoy most.
Interventions
OTHERMat Pilates
Duration: 50 minutes per session Repetitions: 8-12 repetitions per exercise Sets: 2-3 sets per exercise Rests: 30-60 seconds rest between sets Frequency: 3 times per week for 4 weeks Exercises: A series of Mat Pilates exercises targeting core strength, flexibility, and muscle control
OTHERGeneral Exercises
General exercise is a structured exercise program designed to help individuals with back pain improve their fitness levels. The program comprises of a series of exercise classes that are led by a physiotherapist. The classes involve a combination of aerobic, strength, and flexibility exercises, and aim to improve overall physical fitness, reduce pain, and improve function. The program is specifically designed for individuals with back pain, and the exercises are tailored to meet the needs of each participant. The Back to Fitness Program is based on the principles of exercise prescription and is intended to be a safe and effective way to manage back pain through exercise.
Sponsors
Ahram Canadian University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Aged between 18 and 50 years old * Acute nonspecific low back pain with at least 3 points on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) * Willing and able to provide informed consent * Able to comply with the study protocol and attend all treatment sessions and follow-up assessments
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of specific low back pain causes, such as lumbar radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, or spondylolisthesis * Previous spinal surgery * Contraindications to exercise, such as severe cardiovascular or respiratory conditions * Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period * Participation in another clinical trial or receiving concurrent experimental treatment for low back pain
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Pain Intensity | Change from baseline to 4 weeks and 3 months | Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline (pre-treatment), 4 weeks after randomization (post-treatment), 3 months after discharge (follow-up 1). The VAS is a continuous scale comprising a horizontal line, anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Disability | Change from baseline to 4 weeks and 3 months | Disability will be assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at baseline (pre-treatment), 10 weeks after randomization (post-treatment), 3 months after discharge (follow-up 1), and 6 months after discharge (follow-up 2). The RMDQ is a 24-item self-report questionnaire measuring level of disability/function in people with low back pain. Higher scores indicate higher disability. |
| Change in Pain Pressure Threshold | Change from baseline to 4 weeks and 3 months | Pain pressure threshold will be assessed using a pressure algometer at baseline (pre-treatment), 10 weeks after randomization (post-treatment), 3 months after discharge (follow-up 1), and 6 months after discharge (follow-up 2). A pressure algometer objectively evaluates pain sensitivity levels by measuring the minimum stimulus intensity perceived as painful. |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactMohamed M ElMeligie, Ph.d
Outcome results
None listed