Skip to content

Use of Dermabond in Mitigation of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Trial Lead Migration

Use of Dermabond in Mitigation of Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Lead Migration

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05914311
Enrollment
57
Registered
2023-06-22
Start date
2023-09-08
Completion date
2025-02-26
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), chronic pain, stimulator

Brief summary

During the typical SCS trial the leads remain outside of the skin and can be prone to migration. The leads are typically secured in place with suture, tape, or a combination of both. This study will evaluate the amount of movement based on the method of being secured at the time of placement

Detailed description

Spinal Cord stimulator trials require precise placement of leads to get appropriate distribution of pain.1 Since the leads are not anchored into the tissue, migration of the leads can occur and result in suboptimal trial. Migration (or movement in the epidural space after placement) of the leads can result in up to 2.49 mm to 3.24 mm migration in the leads depending on trial length . During the trial the leads remain outside of the skin and can be prone to migration. The leads are typically secured in place with suture, tape, or a combination of both. This study will evaluate the amount of movement based on the method of being secured at the time of placement

Interventions

DEVICESuture

secures SCS trial leads with a suture

DEVICEDermabond

secures SCS trial leads with dermabond

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age greater than 18 * having a spinal cord stimulator trial lead placement done * lead placement to be done in the thoracic spine area

Exclusion criteria

* dermabond allergy * inability to place 2 leads in subject * lead placement not in thoracic spine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Migration rate of trial leadsFrom Baseline through Day 8Migration rate of trial leads anchored with Dermabond and suture versus suture alone will be measured by change in trial lead position as measured in millimeters when comparing initial x-ray after placement versus x-ray taken at lead removal 5-8 days after placement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction ScoreDay 8Patient satisfaction score will be valued on a 0-10 scale, with 0-not satisfied at all up to 10-greatest level of satisfaction
Rate of InfectionDay 8determine if a longer trial predisposes spinal cord stimulation trial lead insertion site to a higher rate of infection
Difference in Lead Position - Prone Fluoroscopy vs Upright X-rayDay 8Difference in lead position on prone (face down) fluoroscopy vs upright (standing) x-ray
Number of Patients with Pain ReliefDay 8Number of patients who received pain relief from the spinal cord stimulation trial. Number of responders to the prognostic lead placements defined as \>50% pain relief over the length of the trial.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026