Comparison Between Glandular Urethral Disassembly Versus Tubularized Incised Plate for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Comparison Between Glandular Urethral Disassembly Technique Versus Tubularized Incised Plate Technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05913128

Enrollment

Registered

2023-06-22

Start date

2023-07-30

Completion date

2023-12-30

Last updated

2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distal Hypospadius Repair, Glandular Urethral Disassembly, Tubularized Incised Plate

Keywords

Glandular Urethral Disassembly, Tubularized Incised Plate, Distal Hypospadius

Brief summary

To compare Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique versus Tubularized Incised Plate technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Detailed description

Aim of study to compare glandular Urethral Disassembly technique versus Tubularized Incised Plate technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Interventions

PROCEDUREGlandular Urethral Disassembly technique

For Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Investigator)

Intervention model description

Prospective randomized clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

MALE

Age

6 Months to 6 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Primary Distal Hypospadius

Exclusion criteria

* secondary Distal Hypospadius Recurrent Hypospadius

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Hospital stay	up to14 days	Hospital stay will be recorded in days.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAhmed AE Abdel Fattah, PhD

faculty of medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026