Skip to content

Clinical Efficiency of Xanthan Hydrogels Containing Local Anesthetics Encapsulated in Nanostructured Lipid Carries

Clinical Efficiency of Xanthan Hydrogels Containing Local Anesthetics Encapsulated in Nanostructured Lipid Carries

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05912335
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-06-22
Start date
2021-06-02
Completion date
2022-05-03
Last updated
2023-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Trauma, Local Anesthesia, Oral Cavity Disease

Keywords

Topical Anesthesia, Topical Formulation, Oral Mucosa, Lidocaine, Prilocaine, Nanostructured Lipid Carrier

Brief summary

In a crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 40 volunteers will receive the following formulations: hydrogels containing LAs (local anesthetic) - lidocaine and prilocaine (both at 2.5%) encapsulated in CLN (XAN-CLN) or not (XAN-CLN ), EMLA (topical anesthetic available on the market) and placebo hydrogel. The formulations will be applied for 2 minutes, bilaterally on the palatal mucosa (first premolar region), in two distinct sessions. Soon after removal of the topical formulation, an AL will be performed at the region using 0.3 mL of anesthetic solution at an injection speed of 1 mL/min. Pain resulting from needle insertion and LA injection will be measured using two visual analog scales (VAS).

Detailed description

Dental treatment presents numerous innovations, but the pain associated with the administration of local anesthesia (LA) continuous to be a traumatic procedure for many patients. Although we use topical anesthetics (TA) to reduce pain, the commercially available formulations are only effective in preventing the pain of the needle puncture. This project aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of xanthan-based hydrogels (2%) containing LAs encapsulated in nanostructured lipid carriers (CLN), reducing pain during puncture and injection of LA in the palatine mucosa. In a crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 40 volunteers will receive the following formulations: hydrogels containing LAs - lidocaine and prilocaine (both at 2.5%) encapsulated in CLN (XAN-CLN) or not (XAN-CLN ), EMLA and placebo hydrogel. The formulations will be applied for 2 minutes, bilaterally on the palatal mucosa (first premolar region), in two distinct sessions. Soon after the removal of the topical formulation, an AL will be performed at the region using 0.3 mL of anesthetic solution at an injection speed of 1 mL/min. The computerized Morpheus® anesthetic injector will be used in order to control the variables of volume and injection speed. Pain resulting from needle insertion and LA injection will be measured using two visual analog scales (VAS). Hydrogels containing CLN are expected to have good mechanical properties and allow the permeation of LAs efficiently through the oral mucosal epithelium. In addition, they can improve the efficacy of topical anesthesia in order to perform a painless LA in the palatal mucosa.

Interventions

The topical anesthetic, or topical formulation, was applied to the palatal mucosa for 2 minutes.

Sponsors

University of Campinas, Brazil
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

The participant and the applicator don't know which formulation was applied because these were named A, B, C, and D and the applicator doesn't have access to the data of which formulation was titled by each letter.

Intervention model description

40 volunteers will receive the following formulations: hydrogels containing LAs - lidocaine, and prilocaine (both at 2.5%) encapsulated in CLN (XAN-CLN) or not (XAN-CLN ), EMLA and placebo hydrogel. The formulations will be applied for 2 minutes, bilaterally on the palatal mucosa (first premolar region), in two distinct sessions. Soon after the removal of the topical formulation, an AL will be performed at the region using 0.3 mL of anesthetic solution at an injection speed of 1 mL/min. Pain resulting from needle insertion and LA injection will be measured using two visual analog scales (VAS).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy participants * No lesions in the study area * Have already been submitted to local anesthesia without intercurrence

Exclusion criteria

* Used any drugs that change the pain sensibility 1 week before * Smokers * Alcoholic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain sensitivity assessment by Visual Analogue Scale after the puncture of the needle of the local anesthetic.2 minutesThe blind investigator evaluated the values obtained on VAS, with a rule, the left far end mean 0, for no pain at all and the right far end mean 100 for maximum pain. Therefore, a a higher score means a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain sensitivity assessment by Visual Analogue Scale after the injection of the local anesthetic.2 minutesThe blind investigator evaluated the values obtained on VAS, with a rule, the left far end mean 0, for no pain at all and the right far end mean 100 for maximum pain. Therefore, a a higher score means a worse outcome.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026