Skip to content

Testing and Evaluating the Collection of Patient Reported Outcomes In Cancer Care Using Innovative Approaches

Testing and Evaluating the Collection of Patient Reported Outcomes In Cancer CarE Using Innovative Approaches: The ePROM Digital Health Tool

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05911672
Acronym
PRICE
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-06-22
Start date
2023-06-20
Completion date
2024-06-20
Last updated
2023-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

cancer, digital health, Ecologically Momentary Assessment, Ecologically Momentary Intervention, Virtual Reality

Brief summary

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are patients' reports of their symptom experience, quality of life and functionality. These measures are used as an endpoint to clinical trials but rarely integrated into routine cancer care. Moreover, they are resource intensive and prone to retrospective biases. PRICE project aims to develop and evaluate a digital health tool (ePROM), collecting PROMs at the clinic and additional Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of PROMs using a mobile application. In addition it tests whether patients who are identified to have elevated pain, fatigue, and stress will benefit from an Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) based on Virtual Reality environments. EMA can overcome biases and barriers in PROM assessment whilst EMI can offer an easy and possibly cost-effective intervention until patients re-visit the clinic. The project can contribute to monitoring patient data and achieve viable health systems. It is also timely since digital health tools are considered the future of oncology care but often lack robustness in development and evaluation. Patients treated for cancer at the German Oncology Centre in Cyprus will be randomized into three conditions: (a) Full Intervention (patients who are prompted to use the EMI based on their EMA data; (b) Partial Intervention (patients who are prompted to use the EMI irrespective of their EMA data); (c) Control (patients who only provide their EMA without an EMI). A dissemination strategy will ensure findings and innovation are available to the public, clinicians, students and policy-makers.

Interventions

DEVICEPRICE

Working closely with 51 cancer patients, medical and paramedical personnel, we co-designed an intelligent personalized mobile application to first collect ecologically momentary assessment data on symptoms like pain and fatigue and Health-Related Quality of Life and subsequently enhance symptom management of cancer patients at home. The full description is available here: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3491101.3503562?casa\_token=tC5fSN8-k5EAAAAA:56\_TMf6HitVQXZypY2j9FCCcroIFZW9kxxzCEt0yJNFJmNrv79m9W7htznSzMWqGLwE4eimBU0vkLA

Sponsors

German Oncology Center, Cyprus
CollaboratorOTHER
CYENS Centre of Excellence
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cyprus University of Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

Patients and providers (nurses and clinicians) will be blinded on the type of intervention received.

Intervention model description

patients will be randomized into three groups: Full Intervention; Partial Intervention and Control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with any type of cancer * Treated as either inpatient or outpatient * Good understanding of Greek * Able to consent * No psychiatric comorbidities

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with psychiatric disorders * Unable to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in usability and feasibility from baseline to one week laterBaseline, after treatment (1 week later)System Usability and Feasibility questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EORTC QLQ-C-30Baseline, after treatment (1 week later)Health-Related Quality of Life. Using the global quality of life scale (minimum 0, maximum 100), with higher scores indicating better outcome (higher quality of life)
Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)Baseline, after treatment (1 week later)Fatigue Assessment Scale with one score (minimum 10 maximum 50) with higher scores indicating worse outcome (higher fatigue)
Depression using DASS-21Baseline, after treatment (1 week later)DASS-21 depression scale with cut off scores: 0-9 normal, 10-13 mild, 14-20 moderate, 21-27 severe and 28+ extremely severe
Anxiety using DASS-21Baseline, after treatment (1 week later)DASS-21 anxiety scale with cut off scores: 0-7 normal, 8-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 severe and 20+ extremely severe
Stress using DASS-21Baseline, after treatment (1 week later)DASS-21 stress scale with cut off scores: 0-14 normal, 15-18 mild, 19-25 moderate, 26-33 severe and 34+ extremely severe
Functionality using EQ-5D-5LBaseline, after treatment (1 week later)EQ-5D-5L score is from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better outcome (higher functionality)

Countries

Cyprus

Contacts

Primary ContactAngelos Kassianos, PhD
angelos.kassianos@cut.ac.cy0035725002252

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026