Skip to content

Four Locator Attachment Mandibular Overdentures

Ten Years Retrospective Study of 4 LOCATOR Attachment of Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture With 2 Different Distributions.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05910333
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-06-18
Start date
2023-03-28
Completion date
2023-10-27
Last updated
2023-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Resorption

Brief summary

. There is little information on the degree of crestal bone loss around 4 inter-foraminal implant-retained mandibular overdentures (OVDs) and the amount of bone remodelling on the anterior maxilla and posterior mandibule on long-term function, particularly with different distributions.

Detailed description

Numerous studies confirm the successful use of implants to retain prostheses in the edentulous atrophic mandible. It has been recommended by some authors that clinicians should use 3 or 4 implants in situations that require increased retention, such as high muscle attachment or prominent mylohyoid ridge. LOCATOR attachment as a retentive component has several advantages over other systems, Such as: dual retention through both external and internal mating surfaces, a self-aligning feature which is helpful in guiding patients when placing their denture. There is little information on the degree of crestal bone loss around 4 inter-foraminal implant-retained mandibular overdentures (OVDs) and the amount of bone remodelling on the anterior maxilla and posterior mandibule on long-term function, particularly with different distributions.

Interventions

OTHERobservation

To compare the effect of the mandibular implant retained OVD using quadrilateral distribution (QD) versus linear distribution (LD) on posterior mandibular ridge resorption (PMandRR), anterior maxillary ridge resorption (AMaxRR), and changes to the crestal bone level around implants after 10 years of function.

Sponsors

Mohamed Elsawy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with 4 implants in the inter-foraminal region. * Patients treated by staff and students in the Master's program in Prosthodontics Department according to the following criteria: * Edentulous maxilla and mandible for at least 1 year. * Problems with retention and stability of the mandibular denture. * Mandibular bone height between 15 and 25 mm.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with relative contraindications, such as * A history of para functional habits. * Smokers more than 10 cigarettes per day. * alcoholism. * Patients with a history of radiation therapy in the head and neck region . • Patients within intravenous administrated bisphosphonates., chemotherapy, and mental disorders that could jeopardies their co-operation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Posterior mandibular ridge resorption (PMandRR)10 years retrospective studyThe amount of PMandRR will be assessed using posterior area index on a panoramic x-ray which use specific landmarkds.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anterior maxillary ridge resorption (AMaxRR)10 yearsThe amount of PMandRR will be assessed using anterior area index on a panoramic x-ray, which use specific landmarks.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crestal bone loss around implants10 yearsamount of bone loss which appears on a periapical radiograph.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammed E Sawy, PhD
Dr_sawy@windowslive.com+201061314522
Backup ContactSalah A. Hegazy, PhD
salahhegazy@yahoo.com+01227690209

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026