Skip to content

Management of Sepsis in Resource Limited Settings Using a Delphi Method.

Expert Consensus Statements for the Management of Sepsis in Resource Limited Settings Using a Delphi Method

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05909384
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-06-18
Start date
2023-05-16
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2024-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis

Keywords

Sepsis, Septic shock, Low- and middle- income countries, LMIC, Delphi, Resource-limited setting

Brief summary

Rapid evolution of sepsis syndromes means that timely diagnosis and treatment are critical in improving outcomes but this may be difficult to achieve in many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) and there is a lack of high quality clinical evidence to guide diagnosis and management in LMIC settings. The wide variability in health systems in LMICs means that additional areas of guidance may be required where staff or facilities are lacking. In the absence of clinical data, to address some of these issues, the investigators aim to use Delphi methodology to obtain experts consensus statements on some specific aspects of sepsis management in LMICs.

Detailed description

The investigators aim to use a Delphi process to generate expert consensus practice statements in the context of diagnosis and management of sepsis in LMICs, including identification of aspects of sepsis diagnosis and management in LMICs not covered by existing guidelines. The questions will undergo several iterative rounds and will be in multiple-choice or Likert scale format. A study steering group will review the results of each round via video conference and design the questionnaire for the next survey. Summary results of each round will be presented to experts, along with the survey questionnaire for the next round. The survey process will be repeated with the modified questionnaire. The Delphi rounds will continue until the desired consensus and stability are achieved.

Interventions

OTHERSurvey

Multiple rounds of surveys collecting information on sepsis diagnosis and management in resource-limited settings.

Sponsors

Asia Pacific Sepsis Alliance
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recognized experts meeting pre-defined criteria (below) from a wide geographical distribution with approximately 70% from LMICs. 1. Clinical expertise in adult sepsis management, AND 2. Demonstrated involvement with sepsis related research, educations, policy/protocols, professional activities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Questionnaire statements which have reached pre-defined consensus2 weeksDescriptive analysis of questionnaire statements which have reached pre-defined consensus. Consensus will be defined as \>70% participants in favour of agree/disagree statements (Likert scale 1-3 means disagree or 5-7 means agree), or \>80% in favour of single option in a single stem question with multiple responses (yes/no answers).

Countries

Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026