Skip to content

Disgust Reduction Through Evaluative Conditioning (DREC) and tDCS in Contamination-Based OCD

Disgust Reduction Through Evaluative Conditioning and tDCS in Patients With Contamination-Based OCD

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05907369
Enrollment
55
Registered
2023-06-18
Start date
2023-01-20
Completion date
2024-03-29
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Keywords

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Contamination symptoms, Disgust, Evaluative Conditioning, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Orbitofrontal Cortex

Brief summary

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating health condition that is known by intrusive and unwanted thoughts and repetitive behavioral or mental acts. 2-3% of the population suffers from OCD in their lifetime. The most common OCD subtype is contamination. The Serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) based on exposure and response prevention (ERP) technique are the first-line treatments for OCD. The challenge is that nearly half do not respond to the first-line treatments or have residual symptoms after completion of treatments. However, the prevalence of the disorder, diversity of symptoms, inadequate response rate, and necessity of having long-lasting treatment effects make the treatments of OCD more challenging. It seems that abnormal, more intense disgust experience has a prominent role in developing and maintaining OCD symptoms, particularly the contamination subtype. Evaluative conditioning (EC), defined as transferring the value of the US to the CS through pairing them, is the most common way of establishing disgust responses. The present study aims to develop an emotion-based intervention technique using EC targeting disgust emotion in contamination-based OCD (C-OCD). The hypothesis is that EC training may modify disgust experiences. Disgust may be the culprit, at least in part, of cognitive deficiencies in OCD. The other hypothesis is whether disgust reduction-focused EC may improve cognitive function, such as attention bias and inhibitory control. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is one of the brain areas engaged in disgust processing and is mostly hyperactive in OCD patients. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over OFC is one of the helpful neuromodulation methods in treating OCD. We aim to see if this method may help to regulate disgust experiences in combination with EC. The participants may be referred by psychiatrists or psychotherapists or be self-referred due to online advertisements or paper flyers. They will be randomly assigned to one of for arms of the study for sham or active EC training along with sham or active tDCS, to which they are blind. The novelty of the present study is the application of EC training in the clinical OCD population in combination with a neuromodulation method.

Detailed description

Disgust as a primary emotion has evolved to protect our lives by driving dirt and disease avoidance behaviors and motivating for cleaning and hygienic behaviors. In recent years, many studies have focused on the role of disgust in psychiatric disorders such as anxiety disorders, eating disorders, body dysmorphic disorders, and phobias. Nowadays, we have robust evidence of the correlation between disgust and the etiology and treatment of OCD symptoms, particularly the contamination subtype. The principal explanation for the insufficient treatment effect of ERP is that disgust is resistant to extinction. Since evaluative conditioning is one of the main sources of disgust feeling, the same process may effectively reduce disgust. The present trial will try to pair contamination-related pictures that are disgust-eliciting with positive, pleasant pictures in order to modify their disgust valence. We also will administer this EC training plus to OFC cathodal tDCS to see if the EC effect becomes more significant than EC alone.

Interventions

OTHERActive EC training

The active EC includes pairing contamination-related pictures (CSs) with pleasant pictures (USs). The EC training takes about 15 minutes and is administered for ten sessions (5 days a week) in 4 difficulty levels.

OTHERSham EC training

The active EC includes pairing contamination-related pictures (CSs) with neutral pictures (USs). The EC training takes about 15 minutes and is administered for ten sessions (5 days a week) in 4 difficulty levels, the same as active EC training.

OTHERActive tDCS

For the active tDCS, the cathode is placed over the left OFC and the anode over the right cerebellum. The brain stimulation is delivered with a 2mA current intensity for 20 minutes in 10 sessions (5 days a week).

OTHERSham tDCS

For the sham tDCS, the cathode is placed over the left OFC and the anode over the right cerebellum, the same as active tDCS. The device is on for 20 minutes, but the current intensity is under the threshold of affecting cortical activity modulation. The participants receive the sham tDCS in 10 sessions (5 days a week).

Sponsors

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants are blind to which of the interventions is active or a sham. Interventional sessions look the same for all participants regarding duration and activities (including doing a computerized EC task and receiving tDCS).

Intervention model description

The two interventions include evaluative conditioning (EC) training and cathodal tDCS over OFC. Each is present in two forms: active and sham. So, there are four interventional conditions, including sham EC-sham tDCS, active EC- sham tDCS, sham EC-active tDCS, and active EC-active tDCS.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The Diagnostic criteria of OCD in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5-TR) with the symptoms of contamination subtype * Able to read, write and do computerized tasks * Stable medication for at least the last three months * Filling out the written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Severe physical illness * Severe other mental disorders * Alcohol and drug dependence * A history of epilepsy or seizure * Have metal or electronic implants in the head or use a cardiac pacemaker * History of head trauma or neurological disorders * Women who are pregnant or may be pregnant * Unable to complete questionnaires, computerized tasks, or informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disgust FeelingFrom pre- to post-assessment (2 weeks after baseline assessment) and from pre- to follow-up assessment (10 weeks after baseline assessment)Effect of evaluative conditioning, cathodal tDCS over OFC, and both on changing disgust feeling intensity measured by disgust rating scale. The scale rates from 0 (not disgusting) to 10 (very disgusting). Lower scores show less disgust feeling.
Clinical Symptoms Severity of Contamination-Based OCDFrom pre- to post-assessment (2 weeks after baseline assessment) and from pre- to follow-up assessment (10 weeks after baseline assessment)Change in Clinical symptoms of contamination-based OCD after evaluative conditioning, cathodal tDCS over OFC, and both, measured by Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale. It is scored on a 5-point rating. The lower scores show less symptom severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attentional biasFrom pre- to post-assessment (2 weeks after baseline assessment) and from pre- to follow-up assessment (10 weeks after baseline assessment)Change in attentional bias toward contamination stimuli, measured by Dot-prob test, comparing evaluative conditioning, cathodal tDCS over OFC, and both.
The power spectrum of brain waves based on quantitative electroencephalogramFrom pre- to post-assessment (2 weeks after baseline assessment) and from pre- to follow-up assessment (10 weeks after baseline assessment)Effect of evaluative conditioning, cathodal tDCS over OFC, and both on power spectrum of recorded brain waves.
Inhibitory controlFrom pre- to post-assessment (2 weeks after baseline assessment) and from pre- to follow-up assessment (10 weeks after baseline assessment)Change in inhibitory control, measured by go/nogo and stop-signal tests, comparing evaluative conditioning, cathodal tDCS over OFC, and both.

Countries

Iran

Contacts

Primary ContactAli Moghimi, PhD
moghimi@um.ac.ir0098 09153176390
Backup ContactFaezeh Raeisalmohaddesin, MsC
fh.raeesi@gmail.com0098 09151232724

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026