Skip to content

Hypotension Prediction Index to Predict Epidural-labor Analgesia Induced Hypotension

Hypotension Prediction Index to Predict Epidural-labor Analgesia Induced Hypotension -- Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05906368
Enrollment
34
Registered
2023-06-15
Start date
2024-04-18
Completion date
2024-08-29
Last updated
2025-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Epidural, Hypotension

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot trial is to examine the feasibility and ease of use of monitoring by ClearSight in laboring and delivering patients with the intent to compare time-to-treatment of hypotension between conventionally monitored patients (Group CM) and those receiving HPI (Group CM + HPI) monitoring by ClearSight, in a population of healthy laboring women who receive epidural analgesia.

Detailed description

In a prospective study, we will achieve the following aims: To determine the feasibility and ease of use of the ClearSight monitoring system in the labor-delivery room (LDR) in detecting and monitoring hypotensive events post-epidural labor analgesia placement. To compare the Time-to-Treatment of hypotensive events between the conventionally monitored patients (Group CM) and those receiving HPI (Group CM + HPI) monitoring by ClearSight.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTClearSight HPI Monitoring system

Continuous blood pressure monitoring for precision hypotensive event response

Blood pressure (BP) monitoring using a conventional arm cuff and inflation after epidural anesthesia as standard procedure. Standard of care blood pressure monitoring includes measurement of blood pressure at the time of epidural test dose delivery, 3-minute cycles of BP monitoring for 30 minutes after epidural placement, and then BP monitoring every 15 minutes per existing clinical standards for at least 4-hours, or until delivery.

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Grace Lim, MD, MS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will wear both a conventional blood pressure cuff and the ClearSight finger cuff throughout the duration of the 4-hours post-epidural placement.

Intervention model description

Participants are randomized to receive standard clinical care (SCC) blood pressure measurement or blood pressure monitoring of HPI via ClearSight with SCC.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant * Age ≥ 18 years of age * Planning vaginal delivery * Receiving epidural labor analgesia (ELA)

Exclusion criteria

* Non-reassuring fetal tracing at the time of ELA request * Contraindications to ELA * Significant cardiac arrhythmias or aortic regurgitation * Arrhythmia * Treatment with antihypertensive medications * Pre-eclampsia with or without severe features * Preoperative infection * Inability to use ClearSight device for any reason * Non-English fluency * Sustains unintentional dural puncture * Incomplete data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-to-treatment of Hypotension (Minutes)From epidural placement until 4-hours post-infusion startThe difference in time between diagnosis of hypotension and treatment by clinical staff between CM and HPI groups
Ease of Use by Clinical Staffreport at 4-hour post-infusionClinical nurse reports of ease of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems easy to use.
Ease of Hypotension Detection by Clinical Staffreport at 4-hour post-infusionClinical nurse reports of ease of hypotension detection using ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems suitable.
Satisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical Staffreport at 4-hour post-infusionClinical nurse reports of satisfaction of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device meets my approval.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Ephedrine, mgEpidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion startAverage ephedrine dose(s) given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups
Total Intravenous Fluids, mLEpidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion startAverage volume of fluids given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups
Total Time in Hypotension With Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg (in Minutes)Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion startAverage number of minutes patients spent within hypotensive events for each group (CM and CM + HPI).
Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations Within 1 Hour of Initiation of ELAEpidural placement to 1-hour post-infusion startPercentage of patients who experience any fetal heart rate deceleration event \[Presence (Yes) or absence (No)\] within 1-hour of epidural placement.
Total Number of Reported Changes in Fetal Heart Rate Category (From Healthy to Deceleration or Excelleration)Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion startTotal number of participants who experienced changes in fetal heart rate category (any)
Nausea (Yes/No)Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion startProportion of patients by group reporting nausea within 4-hours of post-epidural placement
Vomiting (Yes/No)Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion startProportion of patients by group reporting Vomiting within 4-hours of post-epidural placement
Total Phenylephrine, mgEpidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion startAverage phenylephrine dose(s) given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Conventional Care
Patients are wearing both a conventional blood pressure cuff and the ClearSight finger cuff blood pressure monitoring system. Only measures from the conventional blood pressure cuff are sent/received by the clinical staff in the central and local nursing and anesthesia staff areas. The ClearSight monitoring system data is collected but not used by the clinical staff team for hypotensive monitoring. Standard of Care Blood Pressure Monitoring: Blood pressure (BP) monitoring using a conventional arm cuff and inflation after epidural anesthesia as standard procedure. Standard of care blood pressure monitoring includes measurement of blood pressure at the time of epidural test dose delivery, 3-minute cycles of BP monitoring for 30 minutes after epidural placement, and then BP monitoring every 15 minutes per existing clinical standards for at least 4-hours, or until delivery.
14
ClearSight Monitoring
Patients are wearing both a conventional blood pressure cuff and the ClearSight finger cuff blood pressure monitoring system. Measures from BOTH the conventional blood pressure cuff and ClearSight monitoring system are sent/received by the clinical staff in the central and local nursing and anesthesia staff areas. ClearSight monitoring will add additional information regarding hypotensive events for clinical staff to respond to. ClearSight HPI Monitoring system: Continuous blood pressure monitoring for precision hypotensive event response Standard of Care Blood Pressure Monitoring: Blood pressure (BP) monitoring using a conventional arm cuff and inflation after epidural anesthesia as standard procedure. Standard of care blood pressure monitoring includes measurement of blood pressure at the time of epidural test dose delivery, 3-minute cycles of BP monitoring for 30 minutes after epidural placement, and then BP monitoring every 15 minutes per existing clinical standards for at least 4-hours, or until delivery.
16
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyIneligibility criteria identified20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalConventional CareClearSight Monitoring
Age, Continuous29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
29.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
29.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
Body Mass Index33.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
32.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
34.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants12 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants14 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants14 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Ease of Hypotension Detection by Clinical Staff

Clinical nurse reports of ease of hypotension detection using ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems suitable.

Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conventional CareEase of Hypotension Detection by Clinical StaffDisagree1 Participants
Conventional CareEase of Hypotension Detection by Clinical StaffCompletely Agree4 Participants
Conventional CareEase of Hypotension Detection by Clinical StaffNeither agree nor disagree0 Participants
Conventional CareEase of Hypotension Detection by Clinical StaffAgree9 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringEase of Hypotension Detection by Clinical StaffAgree10 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringEase of Hypotension Detection by Clinical StaffDisagree1 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringEase of Hypotension Detection by Clinical StaffNeither agree nor disagree2 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringEase of Hypotension Detection by Clinical StaffCompletely Agree3 Participants
Primary

Ease of Use by Clinical Staff

Clinical nurse reports of ease of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems easy to use.

Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conventional CareEase of Use by Clinical StaffDisagree1 Participants
Conventional CareEase of Use by Clinical StaffNeither agree nor disagree4 Participants
Conventional CareEase of Use by Clinical StaffAgree6 Participants
Conventional CareEase of Use by Clinical StaffCompletely Agree3 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringEase of Use by Clinical StaffCompletely Agree4 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringEase of Use by Clinical StaffDisagree1 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringEase of Use by Clinical StaffAgree7 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringEase of Use by Clinical StaffNeither agree nor disagree4 Participants
Primary

Satisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical Staff

Clinical nurse reports of satisfaction of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device meets my approval.

Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conventional CareSatisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical StaffDisagree1 Participants
Conventional CareSatisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical StaffCompletely Agree5 Participants
Conventional CareSatisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical StaffAgree7 Participants
Conventional CareSatisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical StaffNeither agree nor disagree1 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringSatisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical StaffNeither agree nor disagree3 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringSatisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical StaffDisagree0 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringSatisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical StaffAgree8 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringSatisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical StaffCompletely Agree5 Participants
Primary

Time-to-treatment of Hypotension (Minutes)

The difference in time between diagnosis of hypotension and treatment by clinical staff between CM and HPI groups

Time frame: From epidural placement until 4-hours post-infusion start

Population: Only subjects with a hypotensive event were analyzed for this outcome measure (n=20)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional CareTime-to-treatment of Hypotension (Minutes)21.8 minutesStandard Deviation 17.5
ClearSight MonitoringTime-to-treatment of Hypotension (Minutes)23.1 minutesStandard Deviation 17.6
Secondary

Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations Within 1 Hour of Initiation of ELA

Percentage of patients who experience any fetal heart rate deceleration event \[Presence (Yes) or absence (No)\] within 1-hour of epidural placement.

Time frame: Epidural placement to 1-hour post-infusion start

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conventional CareFetal Heart Rate Decelerations Within 1 Hour of Initiation of ELAYes5 Participants
Conventional CareFetal Heart Rate Decelerations Within 1 Hour of Initiation of ELANo9 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringFetal Heart Rate Decelerations Within 1 Hour of Initiation of ELAYes5 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringFetal Heart Rate Decelerations Within 1 Hour of Initiation of ELANo10 Participants
Secondary

Nausea (Yes/No)

Proportion of patients by group reporting nausea within 4-hours of post-epidural placement

Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conventional CareNausea (Yes/No)Yes Nausea5 Participants
Conventional CareNausea (Yes/No)No Nausea9 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringNausea (Yes/No)Yes Nausea7 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringNausea (Yes/No)No Nausea8 Participants
Secondary

Total Ephedrine, mg

Average ephedrine dose(s) given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups

Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start

Population: Only subjects with a hypotensive event and received epinephrine were analyzed for this outcome measure (n=19)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional CareTotal Ephedrine, mg29.8 mgStandard Deviation 26.4
ClearSight MonitoringTotal Ephedrine, mg23.3 mgStandard Deviation 23.6
Secondary

Total Intravenous Fluids, mL

Average volume of fluids given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups

Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start

Population: Only subjects with a hypotensive event and received IV fluids were analyzed for this outcome measure (n=16)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional CareTotal Intravenous Fluids, mL550.0 mLStandard Deviation 169.6
ClearSight MonitoringTotal Intravenous Fluids, mL535.7 mLStandard Deviation 94.5
Secondary

Total Number of Reported Changes in Fetal Heart Rate Category (From Healthy to Deceleration or Excelleration)

Total number of participants who experienced changes in fetal heart rate category (any)

Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conventional CareTotal Number of Reported Changes in Fetal Heart Rate Category (From Healthy to Deceleration or Excelleration)Yes - Changes in fetal heart rate8 Participants
Conventional CareTotal Number of Reported Changes in Fetal Heart Rate Category (From Healthy to Deceleration or Excelleration)No - Changes in fetal heart rate6 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringTotal Number of Reported Changes in Fetal Heart Rate Category (From Healthy to Deceleration or Excelleration)Yes - Changes in fetal heart rate6 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringTotal Number of Reported Changes in Fetal Heart Rate Category (From Healthy to Deceleration or Excelleration)No - Changes in fetal heart rate9 Participants
Secondary

Total Phenylephrine, mg

Average phenylephrine dose(s) given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups

Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start

Population: Only subjects with a hypotensive event and received phenylephrine were analyzed for this outcome measure (n=9)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional CareTotal Phenylephrine, mg223.3 mgStandard Deviation 242.1
ClearSight MonitoringTotal Phenylephrine, mg506.7 mgStandard Deviation 410.5
Secondary

Total Time in Hypotension With Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg (in Minutes)

Average number of minutes patients spent within hypotensive events for each group (CM and CM + HPI).

Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional CareTotal Time in Hypotension With Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg (in Minutes)12.5 minutesStandard Deviation 19.3
ClearSight MonitoringTotal Time in Hypotension With Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg (in Minutes)7.7 minutesStandard Deviation 9.5
Secondary

Vomiting (Yes/No)

Proportion of patients by group reporting Vomiting within 4-hours of post-epidural placement

Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conventional CareVomiting (Yes/No)Yes Vomiting3 Participants
Conventional CareVomiting (Yes/No)No Vomiting11 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringVomiting (Yes/No)Yes Vomiting0 Participants
ClearSight MonitoringVomiting (Yes/No)No Vomiting16 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026