Educational Problems
Conditions
Brief summary
This is an international, collaborative study evaluating the non-technical skills (NTS) of anesthesiology residents. The goal is to explore the capability of performing a remote, international AR simulation for the purpose of assessing NTS during a neonatal medical crisis. Simulation experts in the United States will facilitate the AR simulations with anesthesiology residents in Chile. The medical simulation itself is grounded in traditional best practices in accordance with the American Heart Association and Neonatal Resuscitation Program.
Interventions
AR headset - a device that the participants will wear over their head and eyes and will add holographic elements to a live view of workplace training scenario
Sponsors
Stanford University
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* age above 18
Exclusion criteria
* a history of severe motion sickness * currently have nausea, a history of seizures * wear corrective glasses (they are not compatible with the AR hardware).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Individual performance of non-technical skills assessed by Anaesthetist Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) | immediately after simulation | The Anaesthetist Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) tool previously published by Fletcher et al. translated in French. The ANTS scoring system uses four categories assessing task management, teamworking, situation awareness and decision-making (1 to 4 points by categories). The minimum score is 4 and the maximum 16 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Individual performance of non-technical skills assessed by Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) | immediately after simulation | The BARS scoring system uses four categories assessing situation awareness, decision-making, communication and teamwork. The score ranges from 1 and 9 (1 = poor and 9 = excellent) |
| System Usability Scale (SUS) Score | immediately after simulation | The scale has 10 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree) |
| ISO Ergonomic scale | immediately after simulation | The scale has 6 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree) |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed