Skip to content

Primary Chemoradiation VS. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed By Surgery As Treatment Strategy For LAVC

Primary Chemoradiation VS. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed By Surgery As Treatment Strategy For Locally Advanced Vulvar Carcinoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05905315
Acronym
VULCANIZE-II
Enrollment
98
Registered
2023-06-15
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2029-09-01
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Locally Advanced Vulvar Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva

Brief summary

A phase 2 randomised controlled trial will be performed in which the efficacy and safety of standard treatment (primary chemoradiation; consisting of 64.5 Gy in 30 fractions of external beam radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin for six weeks) and experimental treatment (NACT; consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel in a 3-weekly scheme) will be compared in 98 patients with LAVC, registered from eight national medical centres.

Interventions

Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, followed by carboplatin 5 area under the curve (AUC). This will be administered in a 3-weekly scheme.

COMBINATION_PRODUCTChemoradiation

According to standard treatment.

Sponsors

The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Woman ≥ 18 years * Signed and written informed consent. * Histologically-confirmed primary or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma vulvar cancer FIGO stage Ib - IVa, T1b or higher, any N, M0. * Local tumour through which the size or localization implies requirement of treatment through primary chemoradiation or surgery consisting of extensive surgery (meaning surgery damaging pelvic organs or exenterative surgery). This can imply; * T1b or larger tumour with (irresectable) groin metastases * T1b or larger tumour with a close relationship to and/or involvement of the urethra or anal sphincter * World Health Organization performance status of 0-2 * Adequate haematological function defined by platelet count \>100x10E9/L, absolute leukocyte \>3X10E9/L or neutrophil count (ANC) \>1.5x10E9/L, and hemoglobin \>6.0 mmol/L * Adequate hepatic function defined by a total bilirubin level ≤1.5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) range and ASAT and ALAT levels ≤2.5x ULN for all subjects * Adequate renal function defined by an estimated creatinine clearance ≥50mL/min according to the Cockroft-Gault formula (or local institutional standard method) * Beta HCG level of 14 mIU/mL or below for women of childbearing potential * Highly effective contraception for patients if the risk of conception exists

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with highly suspicious or positive metastases to the pelvic lymph nodes \* Patients eligible for radical local excision without involvement of other organs * Any psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent * Prior radiotherapy to the pelvis or groin area limiting full dose chemoradiation according to protocol * Existing neuropathy which will hinder the intake of chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Loco-regional control after 24 months per completed treatment including salvage treatment24 months after completed treatmentProportion of patients free from local-regional progression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease free survival24 months after completed treatment
Patterns of recurrence of disease24 months after completed treatmentType of recurrence after treatment: local, regional or distant recurrence
Overall survival24 months after completed treatment
Disease-related treatment failure24 months after completed treatmentPatients without an event will be censored at their last date of contact. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate freedom from disease-related failure. Difference between the two main treatment arms, NACT vs. chemotherapy, will be tested using a log-rank test. Incidences of disease-related failure will be reported based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates, together with confidence intervals for the hazard ratio using both 90 and 95% confidence levels.
Prevention of trimodal treatment24 months after completed treatmentProportion of patients that don't need adjuvant surgery (arm 1) and number of patients that don't need adjuvant radiotherapy (arm 2)
Functional organ preservation24 months after completed treatmentProportion of patients for who an organ-sparing surgery is possible
Short term and long term complications24 months after completed treatmentAccording to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0
Treatment related death24 months after completed treatment

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactFrederic Amant, Prof.
f.amant@nki.nl0031205129111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026