Skip to content

Influence of Manual Diaphragm Release on Pulmonary Functions in Women With COVID-19

Influence of Manual Diaphragm Release Combined With Conventional Breathing Exercises and Prone Positioning on Pulmonary Functions in Women With COVID-19

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05903144
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-06-15
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2023-05-30
Last updated
2023-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19 Pneumonia

Keywords

Breathing Exercise, COVID-19, manual diaphragmatic release, Pulmonary function parameters

Brief summary

Manual noninvasive respiratory techniques gained interest to treat respiratory pathologies related to COVID 19. This study designed to determine the combined effect of manual diaphragmatic release technique with the effect of conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning on pulmonary function parameters (FVC, FEV1, PEF, FEV1/FVC, FEF25, FEF50, FEF75, FEF25/75).

Detailed description

Forty females were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received manual diaphragm release with conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning. Group B received conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning. Both groups took their prescribed medications. Their ages ranged from 35 to 45 years and with moderate COVID-19 illness. Any cases with mild and severe COVID-19 illness, ICU admission, and chest diseases were excluded. Main measures: pulmonary function parameters (FVC, FEV1, PEF, FEV1/FVC, FEF25, FEF50, FEF75, FEF25/75).

Interventions

OTHERmanual therapy

manual diaphragmatic release technique combined with breathing exercise

OTHERbreathing exercise and prone position alone

deep breathing exercise and prone position

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Forty females were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received manual diaphragm release with conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning. Group B received conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning. Both groups took their prescribed medications. Their ages ranged from 35 to 45 years and with moderate COVID-19 illness. Any cases with mild and severe COVID-19 illness, ICU admission, and chest diseases were excluded.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
35 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women with moderate COVID-19 illness diagnosed by a physician. * Patients with o2 saturation \>94%Nonsmoker subjects. * age ranging from 35-45 years. * body mass index from 25 to 34 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable hemodynamic status. * Acute respiratory failure requiring intubation and impaired consciousness. * Inability to collaborate with prone positioning with refusal. * Change of mental status hindering response to instructions. * Poorly controlled hypertension (Mean systolic BP \> 140 mmhg and \\or diastolic BP \> 40 mmhg). * Patients who take continuous o2 supplementation. * Smoking. * Other chest diseases as (COPD-asthma-tuberculosis-cancer). * Male patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
forced vital capacity FVCpre study and 3 weeks post study for all participantsthe amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from your lungs after taking the deepest breath possible which is a common breathing test to check lung function.
FEV1pre study and 3 weeks post study for all participantsthe maximum amount of air that the subject can forcibly expel during the first second following maximal inhalation
PEFpre study and 3 weeks post study for all participantsshow the amount and rate of air that can be forcefully breathed out of the lungs.
FEV1/FVCpre study and 3 weeks post study for all participantsFEV1/FVC, also known as FEV1%) can help distinguish obstructive and restrictive lung diseases.
PEF25%pre study and 3 weeks post study for all participantsPeak expiratory flow at 25% of fvc and the most sensitive measure of airflow in peripheral airways where primary airflow obstruction originates.
PEF50%pre study and 3 weeks post study for all participantsPeak expiratory flow at 50% ofFVC
PEF 75%pre study and 3 weeks post study for all participantsPeak expiratory flow at 75% of FVC
PEF 25%/75%pre study and 3 weeks post study for all participantsMaximum flow rate in the middle 50% of forced expiration.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026