Skip to content

Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation

Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation in Neonates and Infants With Congenital Heart Disease Less Than 1-year of Age Prior Cardiac Surgery: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05902013
Enrollment
152
Registered
2023-06-13
Start date
2022-09-21
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Congenital Heart Disease

Keywords

Endotracheal intubation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to perform a pilot study investigating the first attempt intubation success rate differing between video laryngoscope nasotracheal intubation and direct laryngoscope nasotracheal intubation. The study population will consist of 60 neonates and infants with congenital heart disease less than 1 year of age who need nasotracheal intubation during general anesthesia for cardiac procedures. Standard nasotracheal intubation will be performed using either a video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy. Neonates and infants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to standard video laryngoscopy (with one of the following systems: Storz C-MAC Miller Video Laryngoscope, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany or Mc Grath Video Laryngoscope, Medtronic, Boulder,USA) or to direct laryngoscopy with one of the following blades: Miller or Macintosh (Heine, Hersching, Germany).

Interventions

DEVICElaryngoscopy

laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Days to 1 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

. * Age less than 1 year * Congenital heart disease * Scheduled for cardiac surgery * Planned postoperative ICU stay

Exclusion criteria

* Nostrils not suitable for nasotracheal intubation * Bleeding during dilation of nostrils

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
first attempt intubation success ratestudy period, 30 minutesnumber

Countries

Austria

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREva M Base, MD

Medical University of Vienna

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 15, 2026