Primary Progressive Aphasia
Conditions
Keywords
Speech-Language Pathology, Primary Progressive Aphasia, Fronto-Temporal Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Neurodegenerative Disease, Logopenic, Semantic, Nonfluent, Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia, Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia, Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia, Semantic Dementia, Speech Entrainment, Script Training, Teletherapy, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Remotely-Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Lexical Retrieval, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Telehealth
Brief summary
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a disorder characterized by gradual decline in speech-language ability caused by underlying neurodegenerative disease. PPA is a devastating condition that can affect adults as young as their 50's, depriving them of the ability to communicate and function in society. Along with Alzheimer's Disease and other Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD), PPA is now identified earlier and with greater precision. Increasingly, patients and families seek options for behavioral and neuromodulatory treatments to address PPA's devastating effects on communication, prolong speech-language skills, and maximize quality of life. Studies have documented the robust benefits of speech-language telerehabilitation methods for persons with PPA, with in-home treatment resulting in immediate and long-term benefits. This investigation aims to further enhance the potency of these treatment approaches by pairing them with tailored neuromodulatory intervention that targets critical brain networks supporting treatment in each clinical subtype of PPA. The study will evaluate the feasibility and preliminary benefit of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with evidence-based speech-language telerehabilitation methods. tDCS will be delivered to patients in their own homes and site of stimulation will be tailored for each clinical subtype of PPA. This project has the potential to enhance clinical management and rehabilitation for individuals with PPA by establishing the benefit of behavioral and neuromodulatory treatment that is neurobiologically-motivated and accessible for patients and families.
Interventions
DEVICERemotely supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (RS-tDCS)
tDCS is a type of non-invasive brain stimulation. 1.5 milliamp (mA) of current will be delivered via electrodes in saline-soaked sponges placed on the left side of the head and right upper arm. The stimulation will be delivered for 20 minutes, 5 times weekly, in the participant's home setting while the participant engages in computer-delivered speech-language training. Sessions are monitored by study personnel.
DEVICERemotely supervised sham tDCS (RS-sham-tDCS)
tDCS is a type of non-invasive brain stimulation. During sham stimulation 1.5 milliamp (mA) of current will be delivered for a brief period and then turned off. Current will be delivered via electrodes in saline-soaked sponges placed on the left side of the head and right upper arm. Sham will be delivered for 20 minutes, 5 times weekly, in the participant's home setting while the participant engages in computer-delivered speech-language training. Sessions are monitored by study personnel.
BEHAVIORALLexical Retrieval Training (LRT)
Participants work on producing spoken and written names of personally relevant target items using a self-cueing hierarchy. Treatment focuses on the use of strategies that capitalize on spared cognitive-linguistic abilities to support word retrieval. The participant completes two (one hour each) teletherapy sessions per week with a clinician plus 30 minutes of additional independent, computer-based practice exercises 3 times per week.
BEHAVIORALVideo Implemented Script Training in Aphasia (VISTA)
Participants work on producing personally relevant scripts of 4-6 sentences in length. Length and complexity of scripts are individually tailored. The participant completes two (one hour each) teletherapy sessions per week with a clinician targeting clear and accurate script production, script memorization, and conversational usage of scripts. The participant completes 30 minutes of independent, computer-based practice 3 times per week, during which they speak in unison with a video/audio model of a healthy speaker clearly articulating the scripts.
Sponsors
University of California, San Francisco
University of Texas at Austin
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The order of administration for active and sham stimulation phases will be masked for the participant, study partner, study clinician, and primary investigator.
Intervention model description
Participants undergo 4 weeks of video-implemented script training (VISTA) or Lexical Retrieval Training (LRT) with either sham or tDCS, a 2-month washout phase, and then another 4 weeks of LRT or VISTA with the other condition (sham or tDCS). Order will be randomized.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Because PPA is a rare disease, the study aims to recruit all eligible participants with PPA who are referred to the Aphasia Research and Treatment Lab at the University of Texas (UT) Austin, the UT/Dell Medical School Department of Neurology, and the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) Memory and Aging Center, as well as individuals with PPA from other clinical and research sites. The study will aim to include males, females, and transgender or non-binary individuals. Great efforts will be made to recruit participants from minority populations, subject to the limitation that participants need to be fluent speakers of English. Inclusion Criteria: * Meets diagnostic criteria for PPA * Meets diagnostic criteria for a specific variant of PPA * Score of 20 or higher on the Mini-Mental State Examination * Adequate hearing and vision (with hearing or vision aids, if needed) * Has a study partner that can co-enroll in the study and attend pre-treatment training as well as continue to be present for weekly teleconference meetings * Able and willing to undergo MRI brain scan * Access to high speed internet
Exclusion criteria
* Speech and language deficits better accounted for by another neurological disorder * Does not meet diagnostic criteria for a specific variant of PPA * Score of less than 20 on the Mini-Mental State Examination * Does not have a study partner who can co-enroll in the study * Contraindications for tDCS or MRI scan (History of seizures, head injury, craniotomy, skull surgery or fracture; History of severe or frequent migraines; Metallic implant in head or any metal in head; Pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator or any other stimulator; Chronic skin problems; Pregnancy) * History of stroke, epilepsy, or significant brain injury
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| RS-LRT arm: Change in spoken naming | change from pre-treatment to one month and three months after onset of treatment in each phase (stimulation and sham) | Change in percent correctly named trained/untrained pictures |
| RS-VISTA arm: Change in script production accuracy | change from pre-treatment to one month and three months after onset of treatment in each phase (stimulation and sham) | Change in percent correct, intelligible, scripted words produced for trained/untrained scripts |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire | four months after treatment onset | Likert-type scale measuring patient/client satisfaction with intervention. A higher score indicates greater satisfaction. |
| Change on Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia | change from pre-treatment to one month and three months after onset of treatment in each phase (stimulation and sham) | Change on 10-item Likert-type self-rating scale evaluating communication confidence in different settings for persons with aphasia. A higher score indicates greater confidence. |
| Care Partner Survey | four months after onset of treatment | Likert-type scale used to characterize care partners' perceptions of the benefits of speech-language treatment. |
| Remotely-supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (RS-tDCS) Survey | four months after onset of treatment | Likert type scale used to capture participants' perceptions regarding the acceptability and potential demand for remotely-supervised tDCS. |
| Change on Aphasia Impact Questionnaire | change from pre-treatment to one month and three months after onset of treatment in each phase (stimulation and sham) | Change on Patient Reported Outcome Measure for persons with aphasia; characterizes activities, participation and emotional state/wellbeing using a 5-point pictorial rating scale. A higher score indicates greater impact of aphasia. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed