Skip to content

Continuous Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Sepsis

Comparative Study Between Continuous Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Patients With Sepsis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05897151
Enrollment
110
Registered
2023-06-09
Start date
2023-06-10
Completion date
2023-11-30
Last updated
2023-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Continuous Spinal Anesthesia, General Anesthesia, Sepsis

Brief summary

The anesthetic efficacy and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia and comparing it with general anesthesia technique in sepsis diagnosed patient.

Detailed description

Hemodynamic instability due to high block largely limits the use of conventional dose spinal anesthesia in high-risk septic patients. Hypotension is more common, and also more hazardous, in septic patients, as they may have decreased physiological reserve and compromised blood supply to various vital organs. A smaller dose of local anesthetic reduces the severity and incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia.

Interventions

Preservative free 0.5% Hyperbaric bupivacaine (AstraZeneca) 5mg + 25mcg fentanyl for the initial dose will be followed by top up doses of 2.5 mg boluses of 0.5% Hyperbaric bupivacaine every 10 minutes until the desired block height is obtained considering patient hemodynamics. Norepinephrine starting. dose 0.01 micg/kg/min will be ready for both groups if needed (Mean arterial pressure \< 70 or Mean arterial pressure decreased more than 20% of preoperative value). The infusion will be through a wide bore Intravenous line. The dose will be titrated up or down according to the patient hemodynamics.

DRUGGeneral anesthesia

After establishing of ASA monitoring, a wide bore cannula (18 G) will be inserted. Induction will be done by fentanyl ( 2 mcg/kg ) , titrating dose of propofol according to patient hemodynamic response and atracurium ( 0.5 mg/kg ) to facilitate tracheal intubation maintaining End tidal Co2 between 30-40 mmHg.

Sponsors

Mahmoud Rashad Ahmed
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 21 years old * American Society of Anesthesiologists (III, IV) diagnosed with sepsis (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 7) * Hemodynamically stable and not on vasopressor due to lower limb pathology candidate for spinal anesthesia to drain source of infection.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known hypersensitivity to local anesthesia. * Infection at the site of injection. * Coagulopathy. * Septic shock. * Increase of intracranial pressure. * Severe deformity of the spinal column.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality rate28 Days postoperativePatients' mortality during the first 28 day after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of Heart RateUP to 2 hours postoperativeHeart Rate: pre induction (base line), just after induction then at 1min, 5min,10min, 15min, 30min,1 hour after induction, at the end of the surgery and 2 hours postoperative
Changes of Invasive Blood PressureUP to 2 hours postoperativeInvasive Blood Pressure: pre induction, just after induction then at 1min, 5min,10min ,15min, 30min ,1 hour after induction , at the end of the surgery and 2 hours postoperative

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMahmoud R Ahmed, M.B.B.CH
mahmoud162104_pg@med.tanta.edu.eg+20 102 432 0926
Backup ContactMahmoud R Ahmed
mahmoud162104_pg@med.tanta.edu.eg+20 102 432 0926

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026