Skip to content

Comparison of 3D Printed Foot Orthoses With Prefabricated Foot Orthoses

Do 3D Printed Foot Orthoses Reduce Self-reported Pain?-a Randomised Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05896917
Enrollment
95
Registered
2023-06-09
Start date
2023-05-23
Completion date
2023-08-08
Last updated
2023-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Flexible Flatfoot

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of 3D printed insoles versus prefabricated insoles in otherwise healthy subjects with flatfoot condition. The main question it aims to answer is: * If 3D printed insoles are better in terms of fit, weight, durability, comfort, and effectiveness compared to prefabricated insoles. * If 3D printed insoles are better in terms of reducing pain compared to prefabricated insoles. Participants will be divided in two groups. One group will receive 3D printed insoles and other group will wear prefabricated insoles for four weeks. After four weeks, researchers will record their feedback about their insoles which will help them to compare the two insoles.

Detailed description

The purpose of this research is to compare the effects of 3D printed insoles versus prefabricated insoles in flatfoot subjects. This study will recruit healthy adult subjects with flexible flat feet but otherwise good physical and mental health. They will be divided into groups of an equal number of people. Prefabricated insoles will be given to one group, while 3D printed insoles will be given to the other. Subjective feedback will be collected at week zero, when the subjects will be given the insoles to wear, and again at the end of fourth week. Statistical analysis will be used to determine whether or not there is a significant difference in the responses of the two groups. The results will help us in identifying which insoles are better than the other in terms of parameters described above.

Interventions

DEVICE3D Printed Foot Orthosis

3D printed foot orthoses designed and fabricated at the Taibah University

DEVICEPrefabricated Foot Orthosis

Generic foot orthoses available commercially

Sponsors

Taibah University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 18 years or above * Flatfoot symptoms such as foot/calf pain and fatigue after prolonged walking * Foot postural index ranging from 6 to 12 * No neurological or physical disabilities

Exclusion criteria

* Below 18 years of age * Inability to understand or answer questions * Any lower limb surgery within the past two years * Any lower limb injury within the past six months * Any neurological disorder affecting gait

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog ScaleWill be measured at Week 0The Visual Analog Scale is a validated tool for assessing pain. It involves a 10-centimeter line with the starting point at 0 centimeters representing no pain and the end point at 10 centimeters representing severe pain. Patients mark their pain level on the line, and the distance from the starting point provides a numerical measure of pain intensity.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire.Will be measured at 4th weekThe Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) questionnaire is a tool designed to assess user satisfaction with assistive technology (AT) devices. A modified version of the QUEST questionnaire that will be used here consists of various items related to different aspects of assistive device use, such as device effectiveness, comfort, durability, weight, and dimensions. Respondents will be asked to rate each item on a scale, ranging from 1 (Not Satisfied at All) to 5 (Very Satisfied), indicating their level of satisfaction with each statement.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026