FindTrial
Sign In

Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Versus SWL and Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone

Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Versus SWL and Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone. A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05896345
Enrollment
76
Registered
2023-06-09
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
2021-12-01
Last updated
2023-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Kidney Disease

Brief summary

To conduct a RCT comparing SWL versus combined ODT and SWL as non-invasive methods for management of paediatrics radiolucent renal stone.

Interventions

DEVICESWL

Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone

COMBINATION_PRODUCTSWL and ODT

Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) and Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1-2.5 cm renal stone * Normal Serum creatinine * Radiolucent stone with Hounsfield units less than 400

Exclusion criteria

* Bleeding diatheses. * Patients with a pacemaker. * uncontrolled UTIs. * Severe skeletal malformations. * Arterial aneurysm in the vicinity of the stone. * Anatomical obstruction distal to the stone.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the stone free rate measured by computed tomograghy as asymptomatic insignificant residual fragments less than 3 mm3 monthpercentage of patient who are stone free

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026