Skip to content

Hyaluronic Acid Treatment of the Post-extraction Tooth Socket Healing in Subjects With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Hyaluronic and Synthetic Amino Acids Treatment of the Post-extraction Tooth Socket Healing in Subjects With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2: a Split-mouth Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05896319
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-06-09
Start date
2022-09-07
Completion date
2023-03-08
Last updated
2023-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Delayed Wound Healing, Tooth Extraction Status Nos

Brief summary

The aim of the present split-mouth study was to investigate the effect of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in improving the post-extraction tooth socket healing in subjects with diabetes mellitus type 2. The null hypothesis was that HA can significantly improve the post extractive healing of diabetic patients compared with no treatment. 36 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 requiring bilateral extraction of the homologous, not included, teeth were enrolled. After the extractions carried out in the same appointment, following the split-mouth design of the study, one site was randomly assigned to the test (T) group, while the other one was assigned to the control group (C). T group included: Post-operative application of Hyaluronic acid gels 3 times per day C group included: no treatment. Patients were then followed after 3, 7,14 and 21 days and the healing of each socket was evaluated and compared between the 2 groups.

Interventions

Post-operative application of Hyaluronic acid gel 3 times per day (8 hours distance between each application) for 7 days after oral hygiene and without swallowing, eating or drinking for one hour after the application, as follows: wash your hands thoroughly before each application, apply a layer of gel on the injured mucosa, massage with a finger in order to facilitate spreading of the product over the treated area.

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

split-mouth

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥ 18 years old * diabetic type 2 patients with glycaemia levels under control but with a positive history for diabetes complications (e.g., nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, cardiopathy, peripheral vascular disease) * agreement to be enrolled in the study * availability to come at the control visit

Exclusion criteria

* presence of platelet dysfunction * presence of thrombocytopenia * corticosteroid treatment * smokers * refusal to participate in the study * assumption of drugs possibly interacting with the wound healing * extractions requiring the elevation of a flap

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in healing indexAfter 3, 7, 14, and 21 days from the extraction3 possible scores for each of the 4 parameters considered: tissue color (1= 100% pink gum; 2=\<50% hyperemic gum ; 3=\>50% hyperemic gingiva), bleeding (1=absent; 2=provoked by palpation; 3=spontaneous), granulation tissue (1=pink and firm; 2=red and soft; 3=brittle), suppuration ( 1=no accumulation of plaque on the margins; 2=evident plaque on the margins; 3=suppuration/alveolitis). In this index, a score of 4 corresponds to excellent healing, conversely a score of 12 corresponds to very poor healing.
Change in residual socket volumeAfter 3, 7, 14, and 21 days from the extractionRatio between the volume of the healing socket at a given Time and the volume of the socket at T0. It was calculated by measuring (millimeters) the maximum oral-vestibule (OV) diameter, the maximum mesio-distal (MD) diameter, and the maximum socket depth (SD). MD diameter was measured in the point of the maximum MD width of the socket both for single-rooted and multi-rooted teeth. OV diameter was measured in the point of the maximum vestibule-oral width of the socket or of each root (considering only the maximum value for the pluri-rooted teeth). SD was measured as the distance between the gingival margin and the socket bone in the point of its maximum depth (without forcing the probe).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain assessmentAfter 3, 7, 14, and 21 days from the extractionVisual Analogue Scale

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026