Skip to content

Clinical Outcome After Implantation of Two Different Multifocal Toric IOLs: Liberty (677MTY) and PanOptix®

Comparison of Clinical Outcome After Implantation With Two Different Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens: Liberty Trifocal 677MTY (Medicontur) and PanOptix® Multifocal Toric (Alcon) Lens, With Respect to Rotational Stability, Visual Outcomes, Patients' Satisfaction, YAG Capsulotomy Rate

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05895396
Enrollment
35
Registered
2023-06-08
Start date
2020-09-14
Completion date
2024-05-10
Last updated
2024-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Brief summary

This study is to compare the rotational stability, visual outcome and patient satisfaction after implantation with either Liberty 677MTY, a multifocal diffractive-refractive IOL based on EPS technology manufactured by Medicontur Ltd. (Zsámbék, Hungary) or the multifocal toric IOL PanOptix®, manufactured by Alcon.

Detailed description

According to numerous estimations, 15% to 29% of patients with cataract have more than 1.5 diopters of refractive astigmatism. Corneal astigmatism can be reduced with a variety of surgical techniques including selective positioning of the phacoemulsification incision, corneal relaxing incision, implantation of toric IOLs, photorefractive keratectomy and there are first results of implantation of short arc-length intrastromal corneal ring segments for correcting astigmatism and myopia . The use of toric IOLs to reduce visually significant keratometric astigmatism offers a rational, more predictable and stable method of refractive correction. Implanting a toric intraocular lens offers the possibility of correcting not only spherical equivalent of refraction, but also astigmatism. The success of a toric IOL can be judged not only by its ability to reduce refractive astigmatism immediately postoperatively, but also by its ability to maintain a stable position in the capsular bag in the longer term. Even a small rotational deviation of the toric IOL from its intended axis can result in large reduction of the astigmatic correction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the visual outcomes, spectacle independency, visual disturbances (glares, halos), neuronal adaptation and patient satisfaction after implantation of either the Liberty 677MTY (a multifocal diffractive apodized toric intraocular lens- diffractive-refractive IOL based on EPS technology manufactured by Medicontur Ltd. Zsámbék, Hungary) or the multifocal toric PanOptix® IOL, manufactured by Alcon.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medicontur Medical Engineering Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

The enrolled subjects will be the patients with cataract and pre-existing regular corneal astigmatism between 1.0 to 6.0 dpt.

Exclusion criteria

* astigmatism less than 1 dpt * irregular astigmatism * diabetic retinopathy * iris neovascularisation * serious intraoperative complications * congenital eye abnormality * glaucoma * pseudoexfoliation syndrom * amblyopia * uveitis * long-term anti-inflammatory treatment * AMD (advanced AMD) * retinal detachment * prior ocular surgery in personal medical history * corneal diseases * severe retinal diseases (dystrophy, degeneration) * severe myopia (if required IOL power is lower than 10 D) * inadequate visualization of the fundus on preoperative examination * patients deemed by the clinical investigator because of any systemic disease. * eye trauma in medical history intraoperative exclusions: * tear in capsulorhexis * zonular dehiscence * posterior capsular rupture * vitreous loss and other unexpected surgical complication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rotational stabilityDay 1Rotational stability will be measured using slit lamp images of the implanted lens

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contrast sensitivity defocus curve3 monthsContrast sensitivity defocus curve will be assessed using the Multifocal Lense Analyser iPAD application.
Contrast sensitivity1 yearContrast sensitivity in photopic and mesopic light conditions with or without glare will be assessed one year postoperatively using CSV-1000
Multifocality (Visual Acuity Defocus Curve)3 monthsThe multifocality of the lens will be evaluated also by monocular and binocular visual acuity defocus curves (VADC) using the multifocal lens analyser iPAD application
Patient satisfaction3 monthsPatient satisfaction will be measures with the VFQ-14 questionnaire
Visual outcome (UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, DCIVA, UNVA, DCNVA)1 monthMonocular and binocular visual aquity will be measured at far, intermediate and near by standard ETDRS chart.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety outcome - Complications of IOL implantationMonth 12 postoperativelyComplications of IOL implantation * Posterior capsular opacification (PCO) * Opacification, IOL discoloration
Safety outcome - Postoperative complicationsMonth1 postoperativelyPostoperative complications of cataract surgery * Cystoid macular oedema * Iris abnormalities * Corneal oedema * Wound leak or rupture * IOL dislocation, removal, or exchange * Inflammation (Endophthalmitis, anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, hypopyon) * Retinal tear, break, or detachment * Persistent iritis * Elevated intraocular pressure * Pupillary block * Cornea status
Safety outcome - Intraoperative complicationsDay1 postoperativelyIntraoperative complications of cataract surgery * Posterior capsular or zonular rupture * Vitreous loss/anterior vitrectomy or aspiration * Iris/ciliary body injury * Loss of nuclear material into vitreous * Suprachoroidal haemorrhage * Retrobulbar haemorrhage

Countries

Hungary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026