Skip to content

Comparaison of Two Prone Position Techniques on Occurence of Pressure Sores in ICU

Evaluation Two Different Prone Position Techniques on the Occurrence of Pressure Sores in Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the Intensive Care Unit : a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05894291
Acronym
PROPOSE
Enrollment
334
Registered
2023-06-08
Start date
2023-11-24
Completion date
2025-05-22
Last updated
2026-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Pressure Ulcers Stage III

Keywords

ARDS, Pressure Sores, Pressure Ulcer, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Prone Position, Swimmer Position

Brief summary

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a diffuse inflammation of the lungs that occurs in a variety of diseases. According to the Berlin definition, ARDS is characterized by diffuse lung damage in patients with predisposing factors. Understanding the physiology of ARDS has led to improved ventilatory management, which must be protective to ensure adequate oxygenation and CO2 clearance. Prone position (PP) is a technique that can reduce mortality in patients with severe ARDS. PP results in a more homogeneous distribution of pulmonary stress and strain, helping to protect the lung against ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). It also increases the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, improves the pulmonary ventilation-perfusion ratio, decreases PaCO2 and promotes ventilation of the dorsal lung regions. This technique should be offered to all patients with severe ARDS for 16 consecutive hours, to improve survival and weaning success from mechanical ventilation. However, PP has adverse effects. A meta-analysis showed an increased risk of pressure sores, possibly linked to generalized acute inflammation associated with significant cytokine discharge and diffuse lesions of the vascular endothelium. PP also increased the risk of obstruction and displacement of the endotracheal tube. Final positioning in PP, (i.e., the position imposed on the patient for the duration of the PP session) varies from one ICU to another, and is rarely described in scientific articles. There are two main variants: 1. prone , with arms alongside the body 2. prone, swimmer's position The aim of our study is to show that the "swimmer" PP reduces the occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure sores, compared with the "arms alongside the body" PP (standard care) at Day 28 post inclusion.

Interventions

OTHERSwimmer Prone Position

Patients will be positioned with the head rotated. This rotation is followed by shoulder elevation/abduction, then 90° elbow flexion for the arm opposite to the head rotation. The hand is placed flat on the bed. A 60° to 90° flexion is performed on the hip homolateral to head rotation, combined with knee flexion. The position is changed to the mirror position every 4 hours.

OTHERProne position with arms alongside the body

The head will be positioned either straight or rotated to one side, depending on ICU habits. The arms are positioned symmetrically along the body, palms up. The lower limbs are positioned symmetrically and parallel, knees extended or slightly flexed if a cushion is used on the front of the feet. Head rotation, if applicable, is performed every 4 hours.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Tours
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of New Orleans
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Intubated patient on invasive mechanical ventilation with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome according to the BERLIN classification with a P/F ratio \< 150, requiring prone position. * Express consent of the patient or representative or in the absence of this, emergency inclusion procedure * Health insurance coverage

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with 2 (or more) Prone position sessions * Patient in whom one of the two positions could not be achieved: (Joint limitation; Neck size that would prevent head rotation; Orthopaedic spinal or segmental trauma; BMI greater than 45) * Presence of stage 2 or higher pressure ulcers on the anterior parts of the body at screening * Presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) * Patient already included in the study * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman * Patient under legal protection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure ulcersDay 28 after randomizationPercentage of patients who acquired at least one stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer between day 1 (randomization) and day 28 according to the revised pressure injury staging system (Edsberg, J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs, 2016). Death and resolution of ARDS will be considered as events in competition with the occurrence of a Stage 3 or higher pressure ulcer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality at day 28Day 28 after randomizationMortality rate at day 28
In-hospital Mortality at day 90Day 90 after randomizationIn-hospital Mortality rate at day 90
Number of days without mechanical ventilation at D28Day 28 after randomizationVentilator Free days at day 28
Length of stay in intensive care unit (censored at Day 90)Day 90 after randomizationLength of stay in intensive care unit after randomization (censored at D90)
Length of hospital stay (censored at D90)Day 90 after randomizationLength of hospital stay after randomization (censored at D90)
Presence of ICU acquired weakness at discharge from ICUDay 28 after randomizationRate of patients with ICU acquired weakness defined by MRC score less than 48 at ICU discharge
Occurrence of scapulohumeral joint dislocation during prone periodDay 28 after randomizationNumber of patients with at least one radiologically proven scapulohumeral dislocation during a prone position period

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 13, 2026