Skip to content

UroCAD for Hematuria Evaluation--A Prospective, Multi-center Study

Hematuria Evaluation by Whole-genome Sequencing of Urine-Exfoliated Cell DNA, A Prospective, Multi-center Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05893316
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2023-06-07
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2024-02-01
Last updated
2023-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematuria, Urothelial Carcinoma

Keywords

non-invasive, urothelial carcinoma, hematuria evaluation

Brief summary

Hematuria is recognized as an important sigh of potential urinary tract malignancy. Therefore, understanding the disease processes and discovering the potential urothelial carcinoma (UC) underlying this important sign is critical. Cystoscopy, urine cytology and imaging are most reliable methods for UC diagnosis, but certain drawbacks exist for these methods, such as invasiveness or inaccuracy. Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of human cancer, and it's related with tumor stage and grade. Previous research has proved that analyzing CIN of the DNA extracted from urothelial cells in urine samples seems a promising method for detecting UC. Here we intend to assess CIN's performance for hematuria evaluation.

Detailed description

Hematuria is defined as the presence of 3 or more red blood cells per high-power field (RBC/HPF) under microscopic examination of the urine, which is an important sigh of genitourinary system disease, especially UC. Several methods can be adopted for hematuria evaluation. Cystoscopy is a key component of the hematuria evaluation because it is a reliable way to evaluate the bladder and urethra. Biopsy can also be performed through cystoscopy, making it the gold standard for bladder cancer diagnosis. Despite its high reliability and accuracy, it's an invasive examination related with complications such as injury to the urethra, infection, and discomfort. Flat lesions may also be omitted under cystoscopy. Urine cytology is another important method for UC evaluation, but it has a sensitivity of only 15.8%-54.5%. CIN refers to the ongoing acquisition of genomic alterations, it can range from point mutations to small-scale genomic alterations and gross chromosomal rearrangements. 60%-80% of human tumors exhibit chromosomal abnormalities suggestive of CIN. CIN is presented in UC and it has been adopted as a diagnostic method for UC, such as UroVysion test. Previously, CIN detected by low-coverage whole genome sequencing proved to be a reliable method for UC diagnosis and was named as Urine Exfoliated Cells Copy Number Aberration Detector (UroCAD). In this prospective, multi-canter, observational clinical trial, we intend to assess the possibility of UroCAD as an additional diagnostic tool for hematuria patients by collecting and analyzing 30 ml of urine sample from hematuria patient across 5 centers.

Interventions

The level of CIN The extracted DNA from urine exfoliated cells will be analyzed by UroCAD to determine the level of CIN.

Sponsors

Tongji Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
RenJi Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
CollaboratorOTHER
Changhai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged ≥ 18 years and signed informed consent form. * Participants presented with hematuria (≥ 3 RBCs/HPF) and meet one of the following criteria: 1. Patients recommended to undergo cystoscopy or ureteroscopy; 2. Patients with treatment-naïve, pathology-confirmed urothelial carcinoma; 3. Patients diagnosed with benign genitourinary disease. * Participants diagnosed with cancer other than urothelial carcinoma.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with history of urothelial carcinoma. * Participants with urothelial carcinoma accompanied by other malignancy. * Individuals unwilling to sign the consent form or unwilling to provide urine sample for test or quality of urine sample is poor. * Patients unsuitable for this clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sensitivitythrough study completion, an average of 8 monthsComparison of the sensitivity of the UroCAD analysis versus clinically-acceptable threshold, defined as 75%.
specificitythrough study completion, an average of 8 monthsComparison of the specificity of the UroCAD analysis versus clinically-acceptable threshold, defined as 95%.
Sensitivity among hematuria patientsthrough study completion, an average of 8 monthsSensitivity of UroCAD in detecting urothelial carcinoma among hematuria patients
Specificity among hematuria patientsthrough study completion, an average of 8 monthsSpecificity of UroCAD in detecting urothelial carcinoma among hematuria patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Sensitivitythrough study completion, an average of 8 monthsComparison of the sensitivity of the UroCAD analysis versus urine cytology
Comparison of Specificitythrough study completion, an average of 8 monthsComparison of the Specificity of the UroCAD analysis versus urine cytology

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactShuxiong Zeng, M.D., Ph.D.
zengshuxiong@126.com+8618930568759

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026