Skip to content

Using Different Amplitude-modulated Frequencies of IFC for the Treatment of Trigger Points

Influence of Using Different Amplitude Modulated Frequencies on the Effectiveness of Interferential Current in Treating Trapezius Trigger Points: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05892991
Enrollment
132
Registered
2023-06-07
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2025-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trigger Point Pain

Brief summary

the authors of this work will conduct a randomized controlled trial intended to examine different amplitude-modulated frequencies of interferential current on different measures related to chronic trigger points located in the upper trapezius muscle.

Detailed description

this randomized controlled trial was designed to fill a gap in the literature regarding the most effective amplitude-modulated frequency of interferential current on pain pressure threshold, cervical ROM, and function of the neck region. this study will be consisted of 4 groups, all groups will receive standard manual treatment commonly used for the treatment of chronic trigger points. this treatment will be conducted 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The standard treatment will consist of an intermittent neuromuscular inhibition technique. the 3 experimental groups will receive interferential current sessions (3/week) for 4 weeks with the same parameters except for the amplitude-modulated frequency. outcome measurements will be assessed at baseline, at 4 weeks, and at 4 weeks of the end of the treatment (follow-up).

Interventions

this intervention is a type of therapeutic electrical currents of medium frequency used commonly in physical therapy to relieve acute and chronic pain as well as stimulate muscle contraction.

Sponsors

University of Hail
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants will be allocated to groups by a researcher not involved in assessment or treatment (AAI). Permuted blocks generated using http://www.randomization.com/ were used for the allocation to assure equal and random allocation. Randomization codes were kept confidential in sealed opaque envelopes and sequentially numbered to ensure concealed allocation.

Intervention model description

4 arms will receive treatment for 4 weeks

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* males or females, * 17 - 50 years of age, * unilateral pain in the cervical, neck, and upper shoulder, pain persists for 3 months or more, * pain should be not less than 2 on the visual analog scale (VAS), * having positive signs of chronic (latent) trigger point(s) in the upper trapezius muscle

Exclusion criteria

* cervical and or shoulder pathologies such as disc lesions, arthritis, or compression problems. * neurological symptoms in the upper limb such as radiculopathy. * previous cervical, thoracic, or shoulder surgery. * regular sports practice. * heavy work-related activities. * trauma to the cervical spine (whiplash injury). * osteoporosis. * complex regional pain syndrome. * thoracic outlet syndrome * regular analgesic drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Active Range of motion (AROM) for cervical spine.at baselineActive range of motion (AROM) of neck side flexion (ipsilateral and contralateral) will be measured using a valid and reliable inclinometer application for Android phone. Measurements will be collected while the participant seated on a chair with back support. The phone will be placed horizontally on the back of the head while the participants assume neutral head position. The participant will be instructed to keep the shoulder rested and move the head to one side till the end of the available range. The procedure will be repeated 3 times and the average value will be used for analysis.
Pain pressure threshold by pressure algometerat baselineThe assessor will assess the pain pressure threshold in Kg/cm2 using a pressure algometer (FDIX25 Digital Force Gauge, Greenwich, CT, USA). The algometer will be placed with its tip perpendicular over the TrP then gradual pressure will be applied. The participants will be asked to report pain once they feel it. Measurements will be repeated twice with 30-s rest intervals in-between trials. The mean value will be used for analysis. the more improvement the higher value of pain pressure can be tolerated before pain sensation percieved
Function using neck disability indexat baselineThe participant's functional status will be assessed by a validated Arabic version of the neck disability index (NDI). The NDI is a 10-item questionnaire scored from 0-50 points (0-100%) in which higher scores indicate higher levels of disability. The cutoff points are: score of 5-14 points (10- 28%) indicates mild disability, 15-24 points (30-48%) indicates moderate disability, 25-38 points (50-68%) indicates severe disability, and above 34 points (68%) for complete disability
number of painful episode in the trapezius muscleat baselineThis outcome will be simply assessed by asking the participant try to accurately determine the number of pain attacks in the affected muscle during the last/ previous 4 weeks. the participant will report the number of painful episodes during the last 4 weeks before engaging in the study, then at the 4 months of the treatment program, then at 4 weeks of the end of the treatment program

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026