Spasmodic Dysphonia
Conditions
Keywords
zinc, botox, botulinum toxin, spasmodic dysphonia
Brief summary
One initial study has shown that Botulinum Toxin (BT) in combination with zinc supplementation may increase the duration of effects BT treatment. This initial study was in the context of facial aesthetics. The purpose of the present study is to determine the effect, if any, of oral zinc supplementation prior to BT in the treatment of spasmodic dysphonia. If positive effects will be observed, this would help reduce the burden of disease for these patients.
Detailed description
Botulinum toxin (BT) injections are commonly used to treat various cosmetic, muscular, anesthetic, and neurologic pathologies. In 2012, one study suggested that a combination of zinc and phytase supplementation could increase the duration and degree of effects of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA). However, this study was met with scientific skepticism due to concerns of financial conflicts of interest, unmasking the study too early, and ambiguity of the dosage of zinc used. In 2021, a new study with 25 patients receiving BoNTA injections for the treatment of excessive gingival display (EGD), showed that zinc supplementation prolonged the effect of BoNTA with statistical significance. There has been no further studies or commentary since these latest results were published. The purpose of this study is to test if the effect of zinc supplementation on BoNTA can be replicated and also translated to a different disease process that is also treated with BT-spasmodic dysphonia (SD). If positive effects are discovered, this would strengthen the preliminary results of the 2021 study, encourage future larger studies on the same hypothesis, and, ultimately, could lead to reducing the burden of disease for patients with SD and any other condition that is treated with BT injections.
Interventions
Subjects will take a 50 mg zinc gluconate supplement at breakfast for the five days leading up to their next injection appointment. They will also answer questionnaires and provide audio recordings at various time points of the two injection cycles, which is roughly six months.
This is the current standard of care for treatment of spasmodic dysphonia. Botox injection goes into the vocal cord muscle, and will be occur in both the control and experimental arms of the study.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Patient will be followed for one botox cycle as is current standard of care, and another botox cycle with the proposed intervention of zinc supplementation. Each patient will serve as their own control group.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults patients * 18 years old and above * Current diagnosis of ADductor spasmodic dysphonia * Has had Botox injection treatments for SD \> 6 months
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant * Diagnosis of ABductor spasmodic dysphonia * Patients taking \> 30 mg zinc supplementation daily prior to study beginning
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) Survey Scores During a Laryngeal Botox Injection Cycle. | The patient will submit survey on post-injection day 2, 7, 14, 42, 70 and 98 (if next injection has not been performed). | 10 question, validated survey to assess quality of voice of patients with spasmodic dysphonia. The overall V-RQOL score ranges from 10 to 15 (excellent), 16 to 20 (very good), 21 to 25 (good), 26-30 (fair) and scores more than 30 and up to 50 is poor. |
| Change in Audiometric Recording Data of Subject's Speech During a Laryngeal Botox Injection Cycle. | The patient record their voice on post-injection day 2, 7, 14, 42, 70, and 98. At their next botox injection, a second cycle will immediately begin for an additional 3 months with audio data obtained on post injection day 2, 7, 14, 42, 70, and 98 | At various points in the study, each subject will be recorded saying the same scripted passage. After all subjects have completed both cycles, all of the accrued audio recordings will be analyzed using a computer algorithm developed by one of our authors that assesses the quality of speech, with the data time points being averaged. The proposed algorithm was not successfully developed. One of the major concerns during the development process was which Natural Language Processing metrics should be utilized to best measure Spasmodic Dysphonia speech changes. No analysis conducted. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of Florida
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 17 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 15 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 28 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 32 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 30 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 |