Dental Implant
Conditions
Keywords
robotic surgery, dynamic surgical navigation, 3D printed static guide, Accuracy
Brief summary
For free hand dental implant placement, a key difficulty is to accurately control the position. Improving precision of dental implant placement is considered important for safety and efficacy of tooth replacement with dental implants. There are 3 available methods to improve implant position according to a digitally constructed prosthetically guided plan: the use of a 3D printed static guide, the use of a dynamic navigation system or the use of a robotic system. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the positional implant accuracy, the surgical time, and patient satisfaction among three methods of digital guidance: the use of a 3D printed static guide, dynamic navigation, and robotic assisted surgery. Patients requiring single tooth replacement with a dental implant will be digitally planned using a CBCT and an intraoral digital scan. Subjects will be randomized to one of the three treatment modalities based on the plan. The accuracy of placement will be assessed evaluating the difference between the planned and the actual position using a follow-up scan taken at the end of the surgery. Subjects will be followed up for one year to assess both patient reported and professional outcomes.
Detailed description
For free hand dental implant placement, a key difficulty is to accurately control the position. Improving precision of dental implant placement is considered important for safety and efficacy of tooth replacement with dental implants. There are 3 available methods to improve implant position according to a digitally constructed prosthetically guided plan: the use of a 3D printed static guide, the use of a dynamic navigation system or the use of a robotic system. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the positional implant accuracy, the surgical time, and patient satisfaction among three methods of digital guidance: the use of a 3D printed static guide, dynamic navigation, and robotic assisted surgery. Patients requiring single tooth replacement with a dental implant will be digitally planned using a CBCT and an intraoral digital scan. Subjects will be randomized to one of the three treatment modalities based on the plan. The accuracy of placement will be assessed evaluating the difference between the planned and the actual position using a follow-up scan taken at the end of the surgery. Platform deviation will be measured digitally. Subjects will be followed up for one year to assess both patient reported and professional outcomes and associate them with the precision of implant position.
Interventions
DEVICEDynamic navigation
Implant will be placed under the assistance of dynamic navigation.
DEVICEStatic guide
A static guide will be designed and fabricated based on CBCT and intra-oral scan. Implant will be placed under the assistance of statistic guide through the whole procedure.
DEVICERobotic system
Implant will be placed under robotic arm and human collaboration.
Sponsors
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patient with a single missing tooth, with sufficient bone volume and keratinized tissue at edentulous site, willing to comply with research appointments/schedule.
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant at any point during the study duration; with any systematic diseases/conditions that are contradictions to dental implant treatment; inability or unwillingness of individual to give written informed consent; inability of follow-up according to the protocol.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant positional accuracy | Immediately after surgery | Implant accuracy will be measured as discrepancy between the digital plan and t actual position of the implant. |
| Peri-implant soft tissue health | 12 month follow-up | Defined according to the peri-implant health case definition by Berglundh et al 2017 and the ID-COSM international consensus conference |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient preference | Immediately after surgery | Assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 100 mm, with 0=least desirable option and 100 = most desirable option. |
| Surgeon preference | Immediately after surgery | Assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 100 mm, with 0=least desirable option and 100 = most desirable option. |
| Surgery time | intraoperative | Time needed for surgery procedure will be recorded from anaesthesia to connection of cover screw/healing abutment. |
| Cytokine concentrations in PISF | 12-months follow-up after delivery of crown | Cytokine concentration in peri-implant sulcus fluid assesed by MULTIPLEX ELISA of IL-1, TNFa, IL-6 with lower concentrations representing less inflammation. |
| Submarginal microbiome | 12-months follow-up after delivery of crown | 16S assessment of microbiome diversity (Shannon index) with greater diversity representing a more stable microbiome |
| Esthetics of the restoration | 12-months follow-up after delivery of crown | Assessed using the PES-WES scale as reported by Belser et al. with 0 being the worst and 14 the best value in the scale |
| Pain perception | Immediately after surgery | Patient pain perception during surgery will be recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS with range from 0 to 10 with 10 being the highest possible pain experience) . |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactJun-Yu Shi, PhD
Outcome results
None listed