Skip to content

Evaluation of the Accelerated Traction of Impacted Canines in Terms of Speed and Changes in the Dental Arches

The Effectiveness of Minimally-invasive Corticotomy-assisted Orthodontic Treatment of Palatally Impacted Canines in Terms of Treatment Duration and Dentoalveolar Changes Compared to the Traditional Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05891665
Enrollment
46
Registered
2023-06-07
Start date
2020-01-15
Completion date
2023-03-12
Last updated
2023-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted Tooth With Abnormal Positioning

Keywords

Canine impaction, Acceleration of tooth movement, Corticotomy, Minimally invasive acceleration, Maxillary canine impaction, Withdrawal of an impacted canine, Piezosurgery

Brief summary

The time required for orthodontic traction of impacted canines after surgical exposure is a particularly troubling clinical problem because it prolongs the orthodontic treatment duration. During traction process, several complications could result in alveolar bone loss, root resorption of the adjacent teeth, ankylosis, discoloration, loss or vitality and gingival recession. Accordingly, and due to the lack of studies concerned with accelerating the traction movement of the impacted canines, we conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of some surgical interventions (corticotomy and Piezocision) in increasing the rate of orthodontic traction movement. We also aimed to evaluate dentoalveolar changes associated with the use of such accelerating procedures compared with the conventional traction method.

Detailed description

Adult patients with unilateral palatally impacted canines will be included in this study. One of patient groups will be treated using fixed orthodontic appliances in combination with some accelerated surgical interventions, while the second patient group will be treated using the traditional treatment method. The velocity of traction movement will be assessed in the two groups. The differences between the two groups in terms of the total treatment duration and the traction duration will be evaluated. Dentoalveolar changes associated with the use of such accelerating procedures will be assessed by several variables studied on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. In this study, two groups are going to be evaluated: (1) patients treated in the traditional manner, (2) patients will undergo corticotomy-assisted traction of the impacted canines.

Interventions

PROCEDURECorticotomy

A corticotomy procedure will be applied with some osteoperforations during the surgical exposure of the impacted canine. Then this will be followed after 8 weeks with another surgical stimulation using piezosurgery.

PROCEDURETraditional traction of the impacted canine without corticotomy

In this group of patients, the traction of the impacted canine will be performed traditionally without the involvement of additional surgical intervention.

Sponsors

Damascus University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 28 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients aged 18 to 28. 2. Unilateral palatally or mid-alveolar upper impacted canine. 3. The impacted canine crown not exceeding the middle of the lateral incisor root. 4. Absence of root resorption of the lateral incisors. 5. No contact between the canine crown and the lateral incisor root. 6. Individuals not previously receiving orthodontic treatment. 7. No use of any medications that may affect the orthodontic movement.

Exclusion criteria

1. Bilateral or buccal canine impaction cases. 2. More than 45-degree angle between the canine's longitudinal axis and the vertical facial plane. 3. Any medical condition that prevents oral surgery. 4. Oral structural abnormality that is inherited or congenital.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Traction timeAt the end of the traction stage which is expected to happen within 6 to 8 monthsThe interval between the onset of orthodontic traction on the impacted canine and the emergence of half of its clinical crown.
Total treatment timeAt the end of the orthodontic treatment which is expected to happen between 15 to 24 months.The time between the bonding of the fixed orthodontic appliance until it is removed.
Velocity of the traction movementAt the end of the traction stage which is expected to happen within 6 to 8 monthsCalculated by dividing the depth of impaction, which defined as the distance from the impacted canine cusp tip to the occlusal plane, by the traction duration

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone support ratio of the adjacent first premolarAt the end of the orthodontic treatment which is expected to happen between 15 to 24 months.Alveolar bone height is the distance from the root apex of the adjacent first premolar to the alveolar crest (measured in mm), and the first premolar's root length is the distance from the root apex of the first premolar to the midpoint of a line connecting the mesial and distal points on the cementoenamel junction (measured in mm). The ratio will be calculated by dividing the alveolar bone height by the first premolar root length.
Bone support ratio of the aligned canineAt the end of the orthodontic treatment which is expected to happen between 15 to 24 months.Alveolar bone height is the distance from the root apex of the canine to the alveolar crest (measured in mm), and canine root length is the distance from the root apex of the canine to the midpoint of a line connecting the mesial and distal points on the cementoenamel junction (measured in mm). The ratio will be calculated by dividing the alveolar bone height by the canine root length.
Change of the root length of the adjacent lateral incisor(1) The first assessment time is at one day before the beginning of orthodontic treatment and the (2) second assessment time is at one week following the end of the orthodontic treatmentResorption of adjacent lateral root will be evaluated by comparing the root length before and after treatment.
Bone support ratio of the contralateral naturally erupting canineAt the end of the orthodontic treatment which is expected to happen between 15 to 24 months.Alveolar bone height is the distance from the root apex of the naturally erupting canine to the alveolar crest (measured in mm), and canine root length is the distance from the root apex of the naturally erupting canine to the midpoint of a line connecting the mesial and distal points on the cementoenamel junction (measured in mm). The ratio will be calculated by dividing the alveolar bone height by the canine root length.
Bone support ratio of the adjacent lateral incisorAt the end of the orthodontic treatment which is expected to happen between 15 to 24 months.Alveolar bone height is the distance from the root apex of the adjacent lateral incisor to the alveolar crest (measured in mm), and the lateral incisor's root length is the distance from the root apex of the lateral incisor to the midpoint of a line connecting the mesial and distal points on the cementoenamel junction (measured in mm). The ratio will be calculated by dividing the alveolar bone height by the lateral incisor's root length.

Countries

Syria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026