Breast Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This phase IIb pilot study will enrol 20 patients (women) presenting with metastatic breast cancer (ER/PR + HER2- on histology) who require imaging for staging or re-staging of their disease.
Detailed description
There is little published literature evaluating the usefulness of Ga Bombesin-PET imaging in comparison to currently accepted imaging modalities for detecting progressive metastatic breast cancer. This study aims to produce preliminary research to evaluate its clinical value in breast cancer, given the promising previously published cell line and mouse work in ER/PR+ HER2- tumours. It further aims to ascertain the theranostic potential of the NeoB peptide in the ER/PR + Her 2- population, particularly assessing the level of heterogeneity at sites of active malignancy compared to FDG PET. This study will add PET CT imaging using a tracer agent (NeoB) that directly targets the breast cancer cell. The ability of this new PET CT scan to detect sites of metastatic disease will be compared to standard procedures which include Diagnostic CT, bone scan and 18F-FDG PET. All patients will undergo a single time point imaging at Day 0 with PET CT to be conducted 120 (+/- 30) minutes after intravenous administration with 68Ga NeoB (3.0MBq/kg).
Interventions
DRUG[68Ga]GA-NeoB
Is a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent, intended as a selection tool for \[177Lu\]Lu-NeoB treatment in patients with tumors overexpressing gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR).
Sponsors
Novartis
St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Female patients aged 18 or above with ER/PR+ HER2 - metastatic breast cancer presenting for standard of care staging/restaging prior to treatment of metastatic disease.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Female patients aged 18 or above * Ability to provide informed consent documentation indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study, and are willing to participate in the study * Estrogen/Progesterone receptor +ve HER2 negative disease confirmed on prior biopsy (primary or metastatic site). * Metastatic breast cancer being staged or re-staged prior to treatment of metastatic disease (including those presenting with up-front metastatic disease with primary breast cancer in-situ and those who have progressed on a line of treatment for metastatic breast cancer that are suitable for another line of treatment) * Metastatic breast cancer being staged or restaged prior to change in treatment with standard imaging within 3 weeks of enrolment (CT CAP, bone scan, FDG PET CT)
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnancy or lactation (patients should use highly effective methods of contraception during and for 12h after administration) * Significant inter-current acute illness as per investigator discretion that prevent undertaking study procedures * History of current active malignancy as per investigator discretion other than breast cancer. * Known or expected hypersensitivity to 68Ga NeoB
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy using a standard of truth (Biopsy, response to treatment RECIST and correlate images) | 2 years | Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed by comparing lesions found on 68Ga NeoB PET CT to lesions found on conventional imaging (including CT, bone scan, and 18F-FDG PET/CT). Correlating images by sensitivity, specificity, true positive and negative predictive value |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of SUVmax/mean | 2 years | To compare SUV max/mean of 68Ga- NeoB imaging to 18F-FDG PET CT in patients with metastatic ER/PR+ HER2- breast cancer. |
| Quantitative Variation in Lesion measuring total tumor volume and lesional intensity | 2 years | By direct comparison of sites of known metastatic disease between 68Ga NeoB and conventional imaging. Assessing the presence and/or absence of lesions using SUVmax/SUVmean) |
| Comparison of variation in total tumour volume | 2 years | To compare total tumour volume of 68Ga- NeoB imaging to 18F-FDG PET CT in patients with metastatic ER/PR+ HER2- breast cancer. |
Countries
Australia
Contacts
Primary ContactLouise Emmett, MD
Backup ContactShikha Agrawal, MPH
Outcome results
None listed