Skip to content

Comparison of Keloid Volume and Symptoms Reduction Between Intralesional Umbilical-Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Its Conditioned Medium, and Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection as Keloid Therapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Comparison of Keloid Volume and Symptoms Reduction Between Intralesional Umbilical-Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Its Conditioned Medium, and Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection as Keloid Therapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05887804
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-06-05
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2022-06-09
Last updated
2023-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keloid, Stem Cell

Keywords

Keloid therapy, mesenchymal stem cells, keloid volume, POSAS

Brief summary

This study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining the effect of intralesional injection of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC), umbilical cord-derived conditioned medium (UC-CM), or triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on keloids carried out using CONSORT statement. Research is directed at studying keloid volume reduction and changes in POSAS score.

Detailed description

Patients were screened initially by measuring the length and thickness of the keloids using a ruler. Patients who met the study inclusion criteria were randomly divided into three groups. Each patient in the groups was given the same injection volume (1 mL) in every cm3 keloid volume using a 1 mL syringe and 27G needle. The injections were ultrasound-guided into the center of the lesion with a 30-45-degree angle using an in-plane technique, therefore the same pressure. Group 1 was given umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC) 2 million cells/mL/cm3, group 2 was given umbilical cord-derived conditioned medium(UC-CM) 1 mL/cm3, and group 3 was given triamcinolone acetonide (TA) 40 mg/mL/cm3. All patients received a single dose and 1 booster dose. The percentage of keloid volume regression in each treatment group was calculated by calculating the difference in volume before and after therapy with a 3-dimensional CT-scan, then expressed as a percentage. The CT-scan volume was obtained with the SmartVitrea application (Figure 2), then a POSAS examination will be carried out for subjective and objective assessment.

Interventions

Group 1 was injected UC-MSC 2 million cells/mL/cm3, given the same injection volume (1 mL) in every cm3 keloid volume using a 1 mL syringe and 27G needle. The injections were ultrasound-guided into the center of the lesion with a 30-45-degree angle using an in-plane technique, therefore the same pressure.

Group 2 was injected UC-CM 1 mL/cm3, given the same injection volume (1 mL) in every cm3 keloid volume using a 1 mL syringe and 27G needle. The injections were ultrasound-guided into the center of the lesion with a 30-45-degree angle using an in-plane technique, therefore the same pressure.

Group 3 was injected TA 40 mg/mL/cm3, given the same injection volume (1 mL) in every cm3 keloid volume using a 1 mL syringe and 27G needle. The injections were ultrasound-guided into the center of the lesion with a 30-45-degree angle using an in-plane technique, therefore the same pressure.

Sponsors

Indonesia University
CollaboratorOTHER
Rumah Sakit Pusat Angkatan Darat Gatot Soebroto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The laboratory staff prepared the substances in identical syringes without informing the researchers according to randomization. Data processing was carried out by statisticians and clinicians other than researchers.

Intervention model description

Patients were screened initially by measuring the length and thickness of the keloids using a ruler. Patients who met the study inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 3 groups. Each patient in the groups was given the same injection volume (1 mL) in every cm3 keloid volume using a 1 mL syringe and 27G needle. The injections were ultrasound-guided into the center of the lesion with a 30-45-degree angle using an in-plane technique, therefore the same pressure. Group 1 was given UC-MSC 2 million cells/mL/cm3, group 2 was given UC-CM 1 mL/cm3, and group 3 was given TA 40 mg/mL/cm3.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient has keloids with a length of 2-10 cm and a thickness of 3-5 mm located on the chest, back, abdomen and extremities * Patients aged 18 - 55 years * Post-surgery patients more than 3 months that cause keloids * The patient is willing to fill in the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with hypertrophic scars * History of kidney failure * Hypertension * Pregnant and breastfeeding * History of blood disorders * History of tumor or malignancy * Get other keloid therapy outside of the research procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Keloid volume reduction15 weeksVolume was measured by CT-scan 2 weeks and 17 weeks after the first visit
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score reduction17 weeksSymptoms were measured using The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) on the first visit, five weeks, 13 weeks, and 17 weeks after the first visit. Each item of the POSAS is rated on a 10-point score. The lowest score is '1', corresponding to the normal skin situation (i.e., normal pigmentation, no itching). Score 10 equals the most significant difference from normal skin (i.e., the worst imaginable scar or sensation). The symptoms are considered improved if the score gets lower. The total score of both scales can be calculated by summing up the scores of each of the six items. The total score can range from 6 to 60.

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026