Skip to content

Acute Effect of Neural Mobilization in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Acute Effect of Neural Mobilization in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05887427
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-06-02
Start date
2022-11-10
Completion date
2023-01-06
Last updated
2023-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Radiculopathy

Keywords

NEURAL MOBİLİSATİON,CERVİCAL RADİCULOPATHY,

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of neural mobilization techniques, one of the manual therapy methods that can be used in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

Detailed description

This study was designed as a randomized controlled experimental study and was conducted in the Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department of Istanbul Medicana International Hospital. Population: The study included patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation who were referred to physiotherapy sessions by a physician Patients were assigned to the Control Group(CG) or Neural Mobilization Group(NMG) by simple randomization. The control group received conventional physiotherapy while the neural mobilization group received neural mobilization of the ulnar median and radial nerves. The pain of the patients was evaluated with Numeric Pain Rating Sacale (NPRS) and Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) at the beginning and end of the intervention, while hand grip strength and pinch grip strength were evaluated with digital hand dynamometer (JAMAR Plus Digital Hand Dynamometer) and digital pinchmeter (JAMAR Plus Pinch Gauge). Pre- and post-intervention data were statistically analyzed and compared.

Interventions

Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation, hotpack, ultrasound and neural mobilization(radial,ulnar,median)

Hotpack,Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation ,Ultrasound

Sponsors

Uskudar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants meeting the following criteria were included in the study: age between 18 and 65 years, referred to physiotherapy with a diagnosis of cervical disc herniation, self-reported neck pain with a visual analog scale (VAS) score of more than 5, presence of pain radiating from the neck to the arm, and at least 3 of the following tests were positive: Spurling's Test, Upper Extremity Tension Test-1, Distraction Test, and ipsilateral cervical rotation less than 60 degrees. These tests were assessed by a trained examiner according to standardized procedures

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)2 MonthPain in the neck region of the participants was evaluated using NPRS before and after the intervention. On this scale, patients were asked to mark the pain they felt on a 10 cm scale. Accordingly, the participants marked the range of values 0 was no pain, and 10 was the most severe.
Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ)2 MonthBefore and after the intervention, the characteristics and severity of the patients' pain were evaluated with the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire. This scale was used for initial screening of patients with pain. It has the ability to provide a quantitative measurement for the symptoms that are important in the diagnosis and evaluation of neuropathic pain. In the questionnaire consisting of 12 questions, 10 questions were asked about the nature of pain and the other two questions about changes in sensitivity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hand Grip Strength2 MonthA digital hand dynamometer (JAMAR Plus Digital Hand Dynamometer) , was used to measure hand grip strength.. The test was performed in an upright sitting position, 3 measurements were performed with one-minute intervals between each measurement and the averages were recorded. For painless grip strength, patients were asked to squeeze the dynamometer until they felt discomfort before and after treatment.The shoulder was in adduction and neutral position, elbow in 90° flexion, forearm in neutral position and wrist in 0 -30° extension and 0-15° ulnar deviation position while the patients were sitting in a chair with their arms supported.Both hands were measured separately.
Pinch Grip Strength2 MonthPinch grip (two-point grip) strength was evaluated with a pinch meter (JAMAR Plus Pinch Gauge). The application was performed comparatively in both extremities; patients were sitting in a chair with support, shoulder in adduction and neutral position, elbow in 90˚ flexion, forearm in neutral position, wrist in 0-30˚ extension and 0-15˚ ulnar deviation position.Measurements were taken before and after the intervention. Three measurements were made with one minute intervals between each measurement and the averages were recorded.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026