Skip to content

Comparison of Co2 Laser Versus Co2 Laser With PRP in Scars

Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Fractional CO2 and Fractional CO2 Laser With Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma in Scars

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05887232
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-06-02
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2023-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CO2 Laser in Scars

Brief summary

Objective: To compare the effect of Fractional Carbon dioxide Laser (FCL) Vs Fractional Carbon dioxide Laser with platelet rich plasma (PRP) in management of Scars. Study design: Randomized-controlled trial (RCT). Study setting and duration: Dermatology Department, CMH-Abbottabad, November 2022/April 2023. Methodology: The sample size of 60 patients, age 18 to 50 years, was calculated by using Openepi app and the non-probability consecutive sampling technique was used. Patient in group A received FCL treatment's four sessions with four weeks apart, whereas Group B received four PRP and FCL sessions. The Quartile grading scale (score 0 is \<25%, score 1 is 25-50%, score 2 is 51-75% and score 3 is \>75% improvement) was used to assess the patient's clinical improvement at 4 weeks after each session. To determine statistical significance χ2-square test, taking p-value \<0.05 as significant, was used.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFractional CO2 laser

Patient in group A received FCL treatments four sessions with four weeks apart

PROCEDUREFractional CO2 with Platelet Rich Plasma

Group B received four PRP and FCL sessions 4 weeks apart

Sponsors

Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-50 years * Fitzpatrick skin type III-V * Presented with post-acne, post traumatic or post burn scars * all those patients emotionally balanced with realistic expectations were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* scar that was less than 6 months old * if they had an active infection or inflammatory skin condition * having a history of malignancy * a known connective tissue illness * history of excessive bleeding or keloids * unrealistic expectations * pregnant or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quartile grading scale for assessment of scars16 weeksQuartile grading scale was used to assess effectiveness of CO2 laser and CO2 laser with Platelet rich plasma in scars.Minimum score=0,Maximum Score=3 .Maximum score means better outcome.The Quartile grading scale (score 0 is \<25%, score 1 is 25-50%, score 2 is 51-75% and score 3 is \>75% improvement) was used to assess the patient's clinical improvement at 4 weeks after each session.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026