Skip to content

Comparison of Azelaic Acid 20 % Cream Versus Hydroquinone 4% Cream as an Adjuvant to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Melasma

Comparative Efficacy of Azelaic Acid 20% Cream Versus Hydroquinone 4% Cream as an Adjuvant to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Melasma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05887219
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-06-02
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2023-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melasma

Brief summary

Methodology: Fifty female patients presented with melasma (symmetrically distributed hyperpigmented macules and patches on the face) diagnosed by consultant dermatologist on clinical presentation were included in this study. The sample size was calculated by WHO Sample Size calculator taking 31% proportion of excellent response with 4% hydroquinone as an adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid as compared to 2.25% proportion of excellent response with 20% azelaic acid, 80% power of test and 5% significance level. After randomization, patients were divided into two groups. Group A was managed with 4% hydroquinone cream as an adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid (250 mg twice daily) while group B was managed with topical 20% azelaic acid (daily at night) for six months. Clinical evaluation was done initially at the start of therapy and then at 2nd, 4th and 6th month using MASI score and patient's response. Efficacy was assessed in both groups at the end of therapy after six months.

Interventions

DRUGGroup A 4 % Hydroquinone Cream Topically and Oral Tranexamic Acid

Group A was managed with 4% hydroquinone cream as an adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid (250 mg twice daily) for 6 months

DRUGGroup B Azelaic Acid 20 % Cream for 6 months

Group B was managed with topical 20% azelaic acid (daily at night) for six months.

Sponsors

Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients * Aged 20 to 45 years * Presented with melasma (symmetrically distributed hyperpigmented macules and patches on the face) * Diagnosed by consultant dermatologist on clinical presentation under wood's light.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant patients * Women taking contraceptive pills at the time of study or past 12 months * Any chronic illness * Allergy to any of the agents used in the treatment * Those taking any topical and systemic treatment for melasma in the last one month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Melasma Area and Severity Index6 monthsMelasma Area and Severity Index Score was used to assess response to treatment.Lowest score=0,Highest Score 48. High score indicates worse outcome.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026